How small will they go? New MicroVee Sub

RuSsMaN
RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
Velodyne has a new 'MicroVee' subwoofer.

http://velodyne.com/products/product.aspx?ID=26&sid=794l724w

2000w peak amplifier driving a 6.5" woofer with two 6.5" passive radiators. All crammed into a roughly 9 inch cube made from extruded aluminum - yours for $799 street (audioadvisor.com) .
Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
Post edited by RuSsMaN on

Comments

  • PolkThug
    PolkThug Posts: 7,532
    edited December 2007
    That would be great for computer gaming.
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,411
    edited December 2007
    38-120 +/- 3 db

    38 and it's a subwoofer?

    4lb magnet on a 6.5" drive, that's cool
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • AndyGwis
    AndyGwis Posts: 3,655
    edited December 2007
    They should just encorporate that into a small three way speaker that gets down to 38. I guess I could get two of those microvees, glue some bookshelf speakers to the top and call them full-range.
    Stereo Rig: Hales Revelation 3, Musical Fidelity CD-Pre 24, Forte Model 3 amp, Lexicon RT-10 SACD, MMF-5 w/speedbox, Forte Model 2 Phono Pre, Cardas Crosslink, APC H15, URC MX-950, Lovan Stand
    Bedroom: Samsung HPR-4252, Toshiba HD-A2, HK 3480, Signal Cable, AQ speaker cable, Totem Dreamcatchers, SVS PB10-NSD, URC MX-850
  • bruss
    bruss Posts: 1,039
    edited December 2007
    if my svs took a crap it would look like that
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited December 2007
    I have listened to this and my initial impression was that it sounded kind of like a one note sub, but I didn't do any critical listening. I just happened to strut into the demo room when I was waiting for some new toys while something was playing. It did however surprise me that something that small could actually produce the low end that enveloping. Maybe I'll go back in and fiddle with it for **** and giggles and see if I can't get it to sound better than it was.

    I can hear it now........"that's cute" :rolleyes:

    It is a small little sucker though.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • XJRGUY
    XJRGUY Posts: 258
    edited December 2007
    I don't know how 1000, or for that matter the 2000 watt figure wouldn't just blow those little toy drivers right out of the box.

    How does that work?

    1000 watts into a RTi12 or LSi15 would most likely destroy the bottom end (Bass) and we're talking about (3) 7 inch drivers on the RTi12.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,644
    edited December 2007
    Im willing to imagine that little driver moves ALOT
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited December 2007
    I've been looking for a sub to augment the RT2000Ps I wonder if this is the one. I don't know squat about them so any advice would be greatly appreciated.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,644
    edited December 2007
    Well for starters this is hardly a subwoofer --

    lol

    SVS's - a little larger -- would offer you ten times the performance, especially considering it goes down past 25hz -- where as this one barely goes below 40...

    At 800 bones, it would be more so geared towards a WAF, and nothing much more...
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
    edited December 2007
    I've been looking for a sub to augment the RT2000Ps I wonder if this is the one. I don't know squat about them so any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    DSW PRO, run a pair of them in stereo. Hit the product pages.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • Texas42
    Texas42 Posts: 404
    edited December 2007
    I'd rather have a used older velodyne like the ULD-15 which was an awesome sub in its day....
  • millerman 3732
    millerman 3732 Posts: 1,488
    edited December 2007
    Where do you put a 2000w amp at on that thing, is it external, put on a shelf some where?
    Casey
    H/T: Epson 6500ub
    Sony UBP-X800
    Toshiba HD-XA2 (HD-DVD, CD)
    Onkyo 805 (pre-amp)
    Outlaw 7125
    Polk RTi 10 (bi-amped)
    Polk CSi5 (bi-amped)
    Polk RTi6
    SVS PB 12 plus/2
    Velodyne SMS-1

    TV Rig: Samsung 50'' 4k display
    Polk Signa-1 Surround bar
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited December 2007
    Class D wonder amp for sure.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Ferres
    Ferres Posts: 310
    edited December 2007
    I think all current velodyne models use class D amps. This is a very scaled down version of the SPL-R series.
    Gear: Rotel RC 1082, Rotel RSP 1068 pre/pro, Rotel RMB1077 amp, Cayin CDT 15a CD player, S301 bluray.

    Speakers: Tannoy DC sensys speakers, Paradigm Servo15 Sub, Velo Spl-1500r

    Conditioner: Isotek :D
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited December 2007
    I would like to get a sub that would fit under a large end table or if I run two in stereo then two end tables.

    One question does placement matter when using two subs in stereo mode?

    Thanks
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,644
    edited December 2007
    They need to be close to the left and right mains
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • AndyGwis
    AndyGwis Posts: 3,655
    edited December 2007
    Would it work to put them directly behind the mains?

    I'm thinking of moving my bedroom sub and getting another to the 2-channel rig, just out of curiosity.
    Stereo Rig: Hales Revelation 3, Musical Fidelity CD-Pre 24, Forte Model 3 amp, Lexicon RT-10 SACD, MMF-5 w/speedbox, Forte Model 2 Phono Pre, Cardas Crosslink, APC H15, URC MX-950, Lovan Stand
    Bedroom: Samsung HPR-4252, Toshiba HD-A2, HK 3480, Signal Cable, AQ speaker cable, Totem Dreamcatchers, SVS PB10-NSD, URC MX-850
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
    edited December 2007
    They don't need to be close to the mains, they need to be placed on the front stage where they sound the best, period. That may be behind the mains, between the mains, outside of the mains, firing forward, firing in, firing out, etc.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,644
    edited December 2007
    behind the mains, between the mains, outside of the mains, firing forward, in or out --

    All are close to the mains...
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited December 2007
    hehe, you both are correct. The Russman just elaborated a little bit more.

    Yes, since the room is not anechoic the experimenting with different locations will help the acoustic properties of your room. I.E. end result as to what hits your ears.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • hearingimpared
    hearingimpared Posts: 21,137
    edited December 2007
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited December 2007
    I love the idea of a small subwoofer, especially for simple bass augmentation but a 6 1/2" driver is pushing my envelope of plausibility.

    Yamaha never pulled off the Active-Servo with a small driver so I don't expect it to be anything but a market hole filler. Velodyne is a respected name in subwoofers so I'm sure the overall investment is minimal and they will sell enough to justify the product.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • mjhughes
    mjhughes Posts: 14
    edited December 2007
    38hz isn't very low for a sub. For the same money you could get a real sub that would go low and be of more benefit. That little sub is probably going to honk out mid bass and fool you into thinking it sounds great, but in the long run it would be satisfying.
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
    edited December 2007
    Interesting 13th post in the past 6 years.

    How about we get our ears on it, before we start 'assuming' things. Velo has been pretty good in being honest with their ratings (as is Polk). Chamber rated for the stats, more often than not in room response is (substantially) better.

    Treitz3, go get a listen again and report back. I like the fact the enclosure itself is for all intents and purposes a heat sink.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited December 2007
    I dunno...it looks like they took the idea of the Sunfire and shrunk it down even more.

    38hz ain't super deep but after you load up in a room, it'll probably go deeper than you would think. Hell, most of the 10" subs that we've all had, to include my much beloved P-dime PDR-10 were rated 'only' at 32hz +/- 3db and I never felt that it was 'lacking'.

    I'd be interested to hear it...probably be good in a small room type rig.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,029
    edited December 2007
    Just got back from auditioning this little sub and my initial impression remains my final impression. At low volumes, it would be a consideration for a musical sub that does not go deep. At loud volumes, this sub is annoyingly a "one note" sub. It's not really a sub IMO, but then again it's not what I would consider a midbass module either. Don't really know what I would consider it.

    This may be good to augment with a larger sub under certain configurations and setups, but then cancellations may come into play. It seems to over emphasize certain instruments at times, depending on the material played which can be taylored a little bit to your liking by switching the phase and adjusting the crossover points. I would consider this an accent to the frequency spectrum, but not quite a sub. The envelopement of frequencies delivered spaces out nicely provided there is not a null where you are listening from.

    I did not audition this with stereo subs, only with one sub and some B&W speak's. When I have the time, I'll ask John to allow me to take the Mini-vee sub out of the enclosure of the setup in the front of the store and do a direct comparison of this and the Mini-vee sub which if memory serves, is an enclosed sub selling for 100 smackers less. I'm betting that the Mini-vee would be a tad better, but who knows?
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~