An interesting read from our friends at AH
Ron Temple
Posts: 3,212
The Monitor 30s faired surprisingly well...
http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/speakers/bookshelf/bookshelf-speaker-faceoff-2007
http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/speakers/bookshelf/bookshelf-speaker-faceoff-2007
Combo rig:
Onkyo NR1007 pre-pro, Carver TFM 45(fronts), Carver TFM 35 (surrounds)
SDA 1C, CS400i, SDA 2B
PB13Ultra RO
BW Silvers
Oppo BDP-83SE
Post edited by Ron Temple on
Comments
-
I'm kind of surprised that no one wants to discuss how the M30s compared to the x-ls bookshelves. I've heard the x-ls in a shootout and the M30s in store. Never thought the 2 would meet and definitely thought the M30 would suck hind ****. I liked the x-series BTW. A very promising review for Polk in this price class. I've always considered the current monitors a wasted step up between the Rs and the RTis. Maybe I should rethink.
Combo rig:
Onkyo NR1007 pre-pro, Carver TFM 45(fronts), Carver TFM 35 (surrounds)
SDA 1C, CS400i, SDA 2B
PB13Ultra RO
BW Silvers
Oppo BDP-83SE -
Not wasted at all, the 'Monitor' name wasn't chosen lightly with the heredity behind it.Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
-
It always bothers me when a personal says it doesn't sound as good but I like it better because it is prettier add to the fact their suppose to being chose the better speaker. hummmmmmmmmmmengtaz
I love how music can brighten up a bad day.