Rear Surrounds
I posted this question in another area of the forum, but this was probably a better area for my question, which is:
I have a pair of Fxi3s Surounds monuted to each side of the listening area. The are set for dipole. I had a wild hair that I wanted to also hook the rear surround channels (I have a 7.1 Amp). I am looking at using another pair of Fxi3s to mount on the rear wall and set to bipole. I got to thinking about the speakers being at an angle and wondered if the side mounted dipoles and the rear mounted bipoles would cancel each other out or degrade the sound. If so is there another rear surround that would work better. i have a bid in on a pair of Fxi3 and would need to cancel tonight if this will not work. Thanks for the help.
I have a pair of Fxi3s Surounds monuted to each side of the listening area. The are set for dipole. I had a wild hair that I wanted to also hook the rear surround channels (I have a 7.1 Amp). I am looking at using another pair of Fxi3s to mount on the rear wall and set to bipole. I got to thinking about the speakers being at an angle and wondered if the side mounted dipoles and the rear mounted bipoles would cancel each other out or degrade the sound. If so is there another rear surround that would work better. i have a bid in on a pair of Fxi3 and would need to cancel tonight if this will not work. Thanks for the help.
Post edited by Bagman on
Comments
-
Well, alot would depend on placement and room dimensions, I do not really think it would be a problem though, some of us do use a traditional front firing speaker for our back surrounds, I have used both and had good results either way.
RT1
