Nad vs Cambridge
PolkFan1
Posts: 130
Nad C542 vs. Cambridge Audio 640C Azur
Comments?
Comments?
Post edited by PolkFan1 on
Comments
-
My vote Cambridge Audio 640C Azur, take the saved 400.00 and get somethingDodd - Battery Preamp
Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
Outlaw ICBM - crossover
Beringher BFD - sub eq
Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!
"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..." -
This is going to very much depend on the rest of your system, especially your speakers. These two CDP's have much different presentations of the music. The Cambridge is detailed, neutral, and a forward presentation. The NAD (and I am basing this on a comparison of a 640C I had to a NAD C541, and I own the C521) will have a much smoother, laid back presentation, with less bass articulation.DKG999
HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED
Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC -
This is going to very much depend on the rest of your system, especially your speakers. These two CDP's have much different presentations of the music. The Cambridge is detailed, neutral, and a forward presentation. The NAD (and I am basing this on a comparison of a 640C I had to a NAD C541, and I own the C521) will have a much smoother, laid back presentation, with less bass articulation.
Agreed.
Introducing a NAD T572 dvd/cd player into my system has helped turn my bright sounding rig into a more nuetral, smooth sounding rig. I liked it so much that I have a NAD C542 on order- should arrive in a few days. -
I've had experience with both...like both...but if I had to choose one, I would go with the NAD. Again, it's just a preference..detailed and forward (CA) vs laid back (NAD). YMMV"Just because youre offended doesnt mean youre right." - Ricky Gervais
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson -
Would it be better to get a high quality cd player or a high quality pre amp. I cannot get both because of budget.
-
I just recently dealt with this.
I chose to get a better preamp 1st and found just a slight improvement in SQ and I was not satisfied with the upgrade. My problem was that my source sucked and this was limiting the benefits of the new preamp.
Bottom line is that you need to upgrade both the cdp and preamp. I think it is fine that you can't do it all right now because of your budget. It is more fun to do it in stages anyway. This way you can really tell what each peice of gear is bring into the mix. I'd get the cdp 1st. -
Noticed this was for 640C...not 640rCambridge Audio AZUR 640R
KEF IQ2C Center, Fronts KEF IQ1 , Rears KEF Ci302Q
Sub Outlaw LFM2
Panasonic Plasma 1080i (50u)
Sony DVP-NS70H (DVD)
Belkin Pure Audio PF31 Line Conditioner -
whoopsCambridge Audio AZUR 640R
KEF IQ2C Center, Fronts KEF IQ1 , Rears KEF Ci302Q
Sub Outlaw LFM2
Panasonic Plasma 1080i (50u)
Sony DVP-NS70H (DVD)
Belkin Pure Audio PF31 Line Conditioner