What do you think of the polk rti10s

1lakerfan
1lakerfan Posts: 112
edited June 2007 in Speakers
what do you think?
Post edited by 1lakerfan on

Comments

  • Willow
    Willow Posts: 11,064
    edited June 2007
    I thought they were decent. I found the mids not as clean as the 8's which is why I bought them.
  • BigA524
    BigA524 Posts: 63
    edited June 2007
    love em
    Marantz 1607 - Polk S60 - S35 - Emotiva XPA-3 - Polk DSWPRO550wi
  • C J T
    C J T Posts: 127
    edited June 2007
    Some like the 8's better. Why not get the best of both worlds, pay the few dollars more and get the 12's.
    RTI 12 fronts
    RTI 8 rears
    RTI 6 sides
    CSI 5 center

    HSU STF 3 sub
    Panny 42" plasma
    Denon 3805 receiver
    Behringer EP1500 amp
    Denon 2910 DVD
    Oppo 980H DVD
    Oppo HM-31 HDMI switcher
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited June 2007
    I think the 10's are the best of the lineup. I listen to them daily.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • MADGSF
    MADGSF Posts: 603
    edited June 2007
    I thought they sounded bright and thin when running them with a receiver alone. After I added the amp and better interconnects I love them! The highs were tamed, now they sound full and detailed.
    AVR: Elite VSX-21TXH
    Amplifier: B&K 7250 Series ii
    Misc: Velodyne SMS-1
    Mains: RTi-10
    Center: CSi-5
    Rear: Boston DSi460
    Sub: SVS PC-Ultra
    TV: Panasonic TC-P58V10
    DVD: Panasonic DMP-BD60K
  • C J T
    C J T Posts: 127
    edited June 2007
    Russman:

    can you please tell me, subjectively, how the 10's are better than the 12's?

    not talking value. talking apple to apple. How are the 10's better than the top of the line 12's?

    the 8's are 12's without woofers, the 10's are 12's without the midrange from what I understand

    As price wasn't a factor I went with what i thought was "the best"..the 12's.
    RTI 12 fronts
    RTI 8 rears
    RTI 6 sides
    CSI 5 center

    HSU STF 3 sub
    Panny 42" plasma
    Denon 3805 receiver
    Behringer EP1500 amp
    Denon 2910 DVD
    Oppo 980H DVD
    Oppo HM-31 HDMI switcher
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited June 2007
    The 8's are not 12's without woofers. The RTi4 and RTi12 are the only two speakers in the lineup that use 5 1/4 inch drivers. The 6, 8, and 10 all use 6 1/2 inch. I think the midrange has a more natural sound, especially with male vocals, with the larger, single 6 1/2 inch midbass in the 10's.

    Bigger isn't always better, and in the case of the RTi series, for me the buck stops at the RTi10. As always, your mileage may vary.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • C J T
    C J T Posts: 127
    edited June 2007
    yes but doesn't the 12's have two midrange speakers? And more woofers for mid bass when using a sub?

    I just want to know as I never have heard the 10's and from what I have read here, the mid range is weak. I don't mind less midrange actually if it takes some brightness away.
    RTI 12 fronts
    RTI 8 rears
    RTI 6 sides
    CSI 5 center

    HSU STF 3 sub
    Panny 42" plasma
    Denon 3805 receiver
    Behringer EP1500 amp
    Denon 2910 DVD
    Oppo 980H DVD
    Oppo HM-31 HDMI switcher
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited June 2007
    I have no brightness, and the midrange is damn near spot on. I can't help you with what others have said - mine sound dandy. If they didn't, I wouldn't own them, simple as that.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • VXR8
    VXR8 Posts: 291
    edited June 2007
    Very happy with them, and not even giving them enough juice yet (140 watts RMS)!! Going to purchase a Rotel RMB1095 which should really make them sing.
    Regards - Gaz from the land of Oz

    Main System
    Denon - AVC-4700H
    Emotiva - XPA-9
    Cambridge Audio - Azur 851C - CXUHD
    Polk Audio - Legend L800 - Legend L400 - Legend L900 - LSiM fx - OWM3
    SVS - PB1000 x 2
    Foxtel - iQ4
    Belkin - Pure AV PF40
    Sony K77A9G

    Front Room System
    PS Audio - Sprout 100
    Cambridge Audio - CXC S2 - CA752BD
    Sony - UBX800 4K BluRay
    Polk Audio - Legend L200
  • Sherardp
    Sherardp Posts: 8,038
    edited June 2007
    my 12s sound awesome
    Shoot the jumper.....................BALLIN.............!!!!!

    Home Theater Pics in the Showcase :cool:

    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showcase/view.php?userid=73580
  • C J T
    C J T Posts: 127
    edited June 2007
    sorry guys if i came across wrong..I have never heard the 10's and just wanted a subjective opinion from someone who has compared them to the 12's.
    RTI 12 fronts
    RTI 8 rears
    RTI 6 sides
    CSI 5 center

    HSU STF 3 sub
    Panny 42" plasma
    Denon 3805 receiver
    Behringer EP1500 amp
    Denon 2910 DVD
    Oppo 980H DVD
    Oppo HM-31 HDMI switcher
  • ivansfo
    ivansfo Posts: 145
    edited June 2007
    I think the RTi10 "should" be great for HT. At least that's what I'm going to try next. I had the chance to try the R50s and RTi8 at home. Found the RTi8 bright and lacking midbass.
  • marker
    marker Posts: 1,084
    edited June 2007
    C J T wrote: »
    sorry guys if i came across wrong..I have never heard the 10's and just wanted a subjective opinion from someone who has compared them to the 12's.

    FWIW, I have a pair of RTi12, and a pair of RT2000i (basically a predecessor to the RTi10, but with powered bass drivers/subs) and not knocking the 12, but I like the RT2000i better between the two, even with substantial amplification on the 12s.
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,231
    edited June 2007
    I've got the RTi10's and I love the midrange, mid-bass and bass that comes from these speakers. For my personal tastes, I have disabled the tweeter because of the brightness. Some would consider that detail, I guess it depends on where they are in their audio journey. I have replaced the sound emitted from the tweeters with the full spectrum of sound from a pair of Focal 807v's. The combination for me is outstanding. Keep in mind, from my understanding, these speakers were designed to be in a HT rig, so there good for what they were designed to do.

    When you put these bad boys together with a good sub and give them enough accurate juice, they will not only make you smile, they'll make you feel good. I think the mid-bass punch is it's best attribute. Quick, accurate, pleasing but not overbearing. IMO, I don't hear any loss of midrange, unless playing certain redbook CD's [as opposed to SACD].....that's probably due to the actual recording.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • 1lakerfan
    1lakerfan Posts: 112
    edited June 2007
    MADGSF wrote: »
    I thought they sounded bright and thin when running them with a receiver alone. After I added the amp and better interconnects I love them! The highs were tamed, now they sound full and detailed.

    What amp did you add? I was also thinking about this.