efficient speaker question
I've often read that if you want a high efficiency speaker you have to give up quality or at least accept quirks somewhere. Why is that? (I don't have any particular quotes in mind).
madmax
madmax
Vinyl, the final frontier...
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
Post edited by madmax on
Comments
-
I've often read that if you want a high efficiency speaker you have to give up quality or at least accept quirks somewhere. Why is that? (I don't have any particular quotes in mind).
madmaxTesting
Testing
Testing -
I know that with Klipsch speakers (only really efficient speaker I can think of that is still widely sold) you have to be very carefull of amp and preamp choices. I have heard many people complain of extra noise from the amp and preamp that is inaudible with most speakers. I am not sure why or if it noise or some other incompatibility - but that could add some to the quality statement.
MichaelMains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms) -
I don't think you have to sacrifice quality to get quantity (high sensitivity) but it will cost you something. Either a bigger box, reduced bass extension, or as with horns, the possibility of colorations and/or reduced dispersion or "air".
Of course, it's debatable whether that last point is a bad thing or a good thing. Horn devotees will tell you reducing the sounds bouncing around the room will increase clarity of the direct sound from the drivers (true). But on the other hand, fans of wide dispersion sound will swear a more diffuse mid and tweeter radiation will sound more lifelike, and remind you that live sound comes at us from all around. Also true. In other words, pick your poison!THE MAN-CAVE 5.1 CHANNEL A/V RIG
Sony KDS-60A3000
a/d/s/ HT-400LCR (3)
a/d/s/ HT-300 (2)
Velodyne DLS-4000R (2)
Pioneer Elite VSX-55TXi
Pioneer Elite DV-47Ai
Sony BDP-S300
Sony SLV-779HF
DirecTV HD sat. receiver
MAN-CAVE 2-CHANNEL RIG (shares sources with a/v system)
Adcom GFA-5500
Bose 901 Series VI
NAD C-165BEE
Slim Devices Squeezebox Classic
TEAC CD-RW890
Technics SL-BD20D w/ Audio-Technica P34
Akai HX-A3X -
I think cost is the main thing. You can certainly get a reference system going if you want to drop a huge amount of money, where as it's easier and cheaper to design a good sounding traditional radiating speakers.
I respect Klipsch quite a lot for keeping with their compression drivers; if I ever go down the road of SET, I'm gonna find me some Klipsch's to enjoy them with.Lovin that music year after year.
Main 2 Channel System
Polk SDA-1B,
Promitheus Audio TVC SE,
Rotel RB-980BX,
OPPO DV-970HD,
Lite Audio DAC AH,
IXOS XHA305 Interconnects
Computer Rig
Polk SDA CRS+,
Creek Audio 5350 SE,
Morrow Audio MA1 Interconnect,
HRT Music Streamer II -
It will certainly cost you if you want horns without colorations. Computer models have shown that there are some rules to follow when making a horn, it must have a certain slope to the opening, and it needs to be perfectly round.
Here is a company that makes extremely good horn speakers, but they will cost you an arm and a leg. http://www.avantgarde-acoustic.com/index1.php?sprache=en
Klipschorns, and they have a modern line using the same designs, they have a sound that many SET owners love. I suppose you could call it an aquired taste. They certainly give you the "volume" that makes low power amps sing.