Mark Levinson Pre-Amps, How do they stack up.
del44
Posts: 686
To other 2 channel pre's. Anyone using one in their rig.
Post edited by del44 on
Comments
-
I wish!
-
like everything audio....subjective.Some think they are better than sliced bread,and some think they are too cold sounding.As for me,I have heard some and will agree on the sterile sound.Add to that the price and I think you can do better.Thats not to say I wouldn't pick one up if the price was right,just for giggles.Competition is rampant in that price range.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
Well, I'm thinking used. But there is alot of nice gear in the used market also.
-
I always wanted a No. (something) in my system just so I could refer to it... Yea man, I got a no. 37 preamp and...
madmaxVinyl, the final frontier...
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... -
I always wanted a No. (something) in my system just so I could refer to it... Yea man, I got a no. 37 preamp and...
madmax
I've always lusted after the 333, 150 lbs of clean class A power! Heard it years ago and it didn't sound sterile or cold to me. I won a bid for one on eBay last summer but it turned out to be a scam.:mad: -
hearingimpared wrote: »I've always lusted after the 333, 150 lbs of clean class A power! Heard it years ago and it didn't sound sterile or cold to me. I won a bid for one on eBay last summer but it turned out to be a scam.:mad:
Actually, the ML stuff of late has leaned towards dark. The Krell stuff has been sterile (the end result of a search for "perfection"...I like the stuff from the late 80s and early 90s, before they became so "perfect"). Not so much the case if you go back to their older stuff. I really liked the 27 and the 23 of years past.
Bummer on the auction.
MarkSystem:
VPI Scout/Benz Ace
Sutherland PH2000
Arcam CD72
Yamaha DVD-CX1 (primarily for CD..26 lbs, all BB D/A)
Audioprism Mantissa w/Reference PS
Parasound HCA750 (temporary)
Audiovector M1 Signatures
Kimber 4TC x 2 -
Spacedeckman wrote: »Actually, the ML stuff of late has leaned towards dark. The Krell stuff has been sterile (the end result of a search for "perfection"...I like the stuff from the late 80s and early 90s, before they became so "perfect"). Not so much the case if you go back to their older stuff. I really liked the 27 and the 23 of years past.
Bummer on the auction.
Mark
Well I've heard the sound of amps describes as warm, soft, open, sterile, grainy, harsh, etc, etc, I never heard of an described as "dark." Could you please break that out for me a little more? -
hearingimpared wrote: »Well I've heard the sound of amps describes as warm, soft, open, sterile, grainy, harsh, etc, etc, I never heard of an described as "dark." Could you please break that out for me a little more?Rogue Audio stereo 100 tube amplifier - Lector Zoe preamplifier with 6H30 pi's
.Audience AU24SE speaker and ic cables- Chord Qutest DAC - Black Cat Silverstar II 75ohm digital cable-Tyler Acoustics Linbrook Signature system with large bass cabinets to accommodate 10" Seas magnesium woofers. -
W WALDECKER wrote: »dark = a warm,mellow, excessively rich quality in reproduced sound.the audible effect of a frequency responce which is clockwise tilted across the entire range,so that the output diminishes with increasing frequency.thanks....WCW III
Does that sound bad to you? It would appear by your description that they are boardering on muddy.