rfa-104 vs polk/momo mm 2104

cabolton13

hello everyone this is my first post so here it goes here is a list of what stereo components i have.

kenwood xxv-01d (h.u.)
kenwood cdx-c87 (changer)
kenwood kac-923 (sub-amp)
kenwood kac-943 (f/r-amp)
kenwood khd-c710 (music keg)
boston acoustics pro 6.4 (f-components)
boston acoustics pro 5.4 (r-components)
rockford fosgate rfa-104 audiophile (10"-subwoofer)
mtx 8500 sealed box

my question is the kac-923 puts out 270 continuous(bridged)the rf sub rms is 150 and peak is 300 it sounds good but would the momo be better because the rms is 300 and I'll be able to turn the sub up to it's full potential?

MacLeod

Honeslty, you wouldnt notice a whole lot of difference other than sound quality.

RF subs are geared more toward sheer output where the Polks are more of an SQ sub.

So the Polk would sound better but I doubt it would be any louder if thats what youre after.

cabolton13

MacLeod wrote: »

Honeslty, you wouldnt notice a whole lot of difference other than sound quality.

RF subs are geared more toward sheer output where the Polks are more of an SQ sub.

So the Polk would sound better but I doubt it would be any louder if thats what youre after.

thanks for the info i meet now that the polk rms is higher i can turn the amp up.