10.2 digital surround?
pblanc
Posts: 261
Has anyone here actually heard 10.1 or 10.2 digital surround? Does anyone think it is going to happen anytime soon?
Post edited by pblanc on
Comments
-
denon has a 10.1 receiver but I don't know of any 10.1 content
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-onjMVTvICcX/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=10420&I=033AV5805CCasey
H/T: Epson 6500ub
Sony UBP-X800
Toshiba HD-XA2 (HD-DVD, CD)
Onkyo 805 (pre-amp)
Outlaw 7125
Polk RTi 10 (bi-amped)
Polk CSi5 (bi-amped)
Polk RTi6
SVS PB 12 plus/2
Velodyne SMS-1
TV Rig: Samsung 50'' 4k display
Polk Signa-1 Surround bar -
-
Here is a nice little 10.2 system.http://www.smr-home-theatre.org/ces2001/technologies/page_01.shtmlTesting
Testing
Testing -
I wonder what kind of complex algorithms are involved for the receiver to divide the sound in such a way to be able to place the action in the correct speakers? I mean, I can understand how you can take 5.1 and split it to 7.1. But the complexities of taking a 5.1 or even 7.1 source and making it 10.1 just baffles me.
Personally I think the amount of miscalculation of what to place in the 10.1 arrangement would cause the system to be... for lack of a better term... disorienting.
Now when they start making source material in 10.1 format, I will then jump all over that system. Woo Hoo!Holydoc (Home Theatre Lover)
__________________________________________
Panasonic -50PX600U 50" Plasma
Onkyo -TX-NR901 Receiver
Oppo -Oppo 980HD Universal DVD Player
Outlaw -770 (7x200watt) Amplifier
PolkAudio - RTi12 (Left and Right)
PolkAudio - CSi5 (Center)
PolkAudio - FXi3 (Back and Surround)
SVS - PB-12/Plus (Subwoofer)
Bluejean Cables - Interconnects
Logitech Harmony 880 - Remote -
In latter years, Tom Holman has recorded material in this format. If you do some further searches, you will find the pages. There was a demonstration near where I live. Unfortuantly, I did not know of this until after the event. It would have been interesting to hear such a setup.
As for the 9.1 format, I wonder if they will be adding the front height channels to the 7.1 format??All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed and third, it is accepted as self evident. -
I cannot imagine the room size that you would have to have in order to really be able to enjoy something like this. Let me note first that other than 7.1, I know nothing about surround sound with more channels. With 9.1 you actually have not only the surround speakers, but know you actually vary the heights of the speakers to get even more spatial imaging? Basically meaning that instead of just getting 360 degree horizontal sound, you start to factor in vertical sound giving you more of a spherical or real world sound. Before you know it there will be purposeful speakers in the ceiling(not just asthetics) and speakers in the floor. I can hear Darth Vader plunging to his death now as he falls into oblivion. How cool would that be!?!I know just enough to be dangerous, but don't tell my wife, she thinks I'm a genius.
Pioneer VSX-816
Monitor 40's - fronts, bi-amped
Monitor 30's - surrounds
CS1 - center
PSW10 - I'll let you guess
Blue Jeans Cable - speaker cable
Daewoo 27 incher - one step up from a console
Sony Progressive scan DVD
XBOX
SOPA since 2008
Here's my stuff. -
I can't remember where it was I read up on this. Apparently, 10.2 is being pushed by one of the originators of THX and is described as "twice as good as 5.1". I understand that there is only one DVD encoded in 10.2, basically a demo movie. The speaker array includes the usual L/R mains, front center and side surrounds in addition to 2 high front speakers (like Yamaha's presence channel speakers) and a pair of wide front speakers to broaden the front soundstage. The 10th channel is a rear center surround. Also recommended is using both a pair of dipole side surrounds and a pair of direct radiating side/rear surrounds for a whopping total of 12 full-range speakers. In addition, there are stereo L/R subout channels. I'm pretty sure this would be twice as good at least for the speaker and amp manufacturers.
-
I'm sure that speaker manufacturers would love this. Although it sounds as though you would go from Home Theater in a Box, to Home Theater in a Small Box Truck. Have you heard of them ever attempting to do more a real world sound with both horizontal and vertical surround sound? It seems to me that in this day and age with HD and trying to get everything more realistic that not only do you want it to look like you are there, but truly sound like it.I know just enough to be dangerous, but don't tell my wife, she thinks I'm a genius.
Pioneer VSX-816
Monitor 40's - fronts, bi-amped
Monitor 30's - surrounds
CS1 - center
PSW10 - I'll let you guess
Blue Jeans Cable - speaker cable
Daewoo 27 incher - one step up from a console
Sony Progressive scan DVD
XBOX
SOPA since 2008
Here's my stuff. -
$7000 for a reciever?.....I'll pass.Monitor 7b's front
Monitor 4's surround
Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
M10's back surround
Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
Harman/Kardon AVR-635
Oppo 981hd
Denon upconvert DVD player
Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
Mit RPTV WS-55513
Tosh HD-XA1
B&K AV5000
Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek: -
I've heard 10.2 plenty of times in the local movie theatre I think.58" Samsung Plasma (on wall)(calibrated)
LSi15's front (modded xo's)
LSic center
LSiFX's sides
LSi7's rears
Sunfire Sig. 600 amp for 15's
Sunfire Sig. Cinema for C,S&R
Sony ES 3000 pre/pro
SVS 2039 PC Plus sub 12.3 (16hz tune)
PS3
Wii
Signal and Audioquest ic's
12 awg monster speaker-cable (bi-wired)
Belkin PF60 power conditioner
Monster power conditioner for sub -
I'm sure it might be great for medium to large auditoriums, but for typical home use it's big-time overkill. I'm sure special titles/mixes will need to be marketed."Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
-
10.2 surround sound consists of:
Center 0 degrees
L+R +-30 degrees
L+R +-45 degrees horizontal, 45 degrees vertical
L+R +-60 degrees
L+R +-120 degrees
Rear 180 degrees
L+R LFE +-90 degrees
The 45 degree speakers add the vertical dimension to the soundtrack.
Tom Holman (the TH of THX) is trying to make this a new standard. He has been creating demo material for some time now. I am not aware of a DVD, but that would be interesting to watch.
Pepi28, I don't think you have heard 10.2 in any theater as there are no soundtracks with this number of channels. You may have heard a 5.1 or 6.1 soundtrack played back in a theater with multiple speakers per channel.All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed and third, it is accepted as self evident. -
Thanks jm1. It would definitely be a cool thing to have in theaters if they could pull it off, but I would think that with the degree of rake in today's theaters with the need to make sound coming from below and above would sound pretty bad for the majority of the people in there. I guess with some extremely good planning it would work, but it would seem to be extremely tough,I know just enough to be dangerous, but don't tell my wife, she thinks I'm a genius.
Pioneer VSX-816
Monitor 40's - fronts, bi-amped
Monitor 30's - surrounds
CS1 - center
PSW10 - I'll let you guess
Blue Jeans Cable - speaker cable
Daewoo 27 incher - one step up from a console
Sony Progressive scan DVD
XBOX
SOPA since 2008
Here's my stuff. -
millerman 3732 wrote:denon has a 10.1 receiver but I don't know of any 10.1 content
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-onjMVTvICcX/cgi-bin/ProdView.asp?g=10420&I=033AV5805C
* 5.1 surround in main room with all channels bi-amplified
* 5.1 surround in main room, 5.1 surround in 2nd room
* 5.1 surround in main room, stereo in 2nd and 3rd rooms, mono in 4th room
* 6.1 surround in main room, stereo in 2nd and 3rd rooms
* 7.1 surround in main room, stereo in 2nd room, mono in 3rd room
* 9.1 surround in main room, mono in 2nd room -
jm1 wrote:Tom Holman (the “TH” of THX) is trying to make this a new standard. He has been creating demo material for some time now.
At the risk of sounding like a total moron, I thought George Lucas created THX, and named it so after a character from his movie named 'THX 1138'.
Who is Tom Holman?Do you hear that buzzing noise? -
At the risk of sounding like a total moron, I thought George Lucas created THX, and named it so after a character from his movie named 'THX 1138'.
Who is Tom Holman?
That is what I always heard too. Though wikipedia says:According to Tomlinson Holman, the inventor of the THX system, the name of the technology was deliberately chosen because it contained both a reference to his name, and to Lucas's early film, THX 1138. The original name was "Tom Holman's Crossover" (Crossover being sometimes referred to as Xover), but was later changed to mean "Tomlinson Holman's eXperiment".Holydoc (Home Theatre Lover)
__________________________________________
Panasonic -50PX600U 50" Plasma
Onkyo -TX-NR901 Receiver
Oppo -Oppo 980HD Universal DVD Player
Outlaw -770 (7x200watt) Amplifier
PolkAudio - RTi12 (Left and Right)
PolkAudio - CSi5 (Center)
PolkAudio - FXi3 (Back and Surround)
SVS - PB-12/Plus (Subwoofer)
Bluejean Cables - Interconnects
Logitech Harmony 880 - Remote -
jakelm wrote:$7000 for a reciever?.....I'll pass.
LOL.....Me tooDon't forget to look at My Home Theater
Receiver - Onkyo TX-SR503
Fronts - Polk Audio Monitor 40
Center - Polk Audio CS1
Surrounds - Paradigm Cinema ADP
Subwoofer - Velodyne VRP-1200