Alpine PDX

howie777
howie777 Posts: 357
edited December 2006 in Car Audio & Electronics
Anyone have an opinion on these amps? I currently only have SR6500's and would like to add an SR sub but don't really want to take up more space than I have too. So I was thinking of a 2 channel PDX for the SR6500s and the mono for the sub. This way I can just stack the amps up.

Thanks,

Howie
Post edited by howie777 on

Comments

  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited December 2006
    Theyre excellent amps.

    A teammate of mine uses them in his system and loves them. He also took Best of Show (highest score) at finals last month.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • audiobliss
    audiobliss Posts: 12,518
    edited December 2006
    I would personally prefer a A/B amp for my highs/mids. But, supposedly Aline's PDX Class D amps are every bit as clean as an A/B amp.
    Jstas wrote: »
    Simple question. If you had a cool million bucks, what would you do with it?
    Wonder WTF happened to the rest of my money.
    In Use
    PS3, Yamaha CDR-HD1300, Plex, Amazon Fire TV Gen 2
    Pioneer Elite VSX-52, Parasound HCA-1000A
    Klipsch RF-82ii, RC-62ii, RS-42ii, RW-10d
    Epson 8700UB

    In Storage
    [Home Audio]
    Rotel RCD-02, Yamaha KX-W900U, Sony ST-S500ES, Denon DP-7F
    Pro-Ject Phono Box MKII, Parasound P/HP-850, ASL Wave 20 monoblocks
    Klipsch RF-35, RB-51ii

    [Car Audio]
    Pioneer Premier DEH-P860MP, Memphis 16-MCA3004, Boston Acoustic RC520
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited December 2006
    Not me.

    If I could afford it and had the room, I would stick a full range Class D on each speaker.

    I like the idea of each channel being totally independant of the others. Absolutely no chance of cross talk.

    But thats being extremely nitpicky. Its doubtful anyone could ever even notice the difference but its just one of those things that it would sound better because I "thought" it did. :D
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • howie777
    howie777 Posts: 357
    edited December 2006
    Well I didn't notice that the mono version is $800! If they had a 500 - 600 watt version I'd consider it but I don't want to spend that much on the amps. Or I could keep the 400.4 and just get the mono but that doesn't solve the space issue. So then it would just make sense to get the 500.1.

    Oh well, I don't have time just yet so I can think it through.

    Thanks for the advice.

    Howie