Anyone ever heard or used paradigm speakers or subs

Home Theatre
Home Theatre Posts: 469
edited October 2006 in Speakers
How was yoru experience? How does it compare to Polk?
Everything I own burned in the fire!!!!!!!!!!
Post edited by Home Theatre on

Comments

  • McLoki
    McLoki Posts: 5,231
    edited October 2006
    I heard the studio 100's. They were in a very brite room (lots of reflective materials) when i heard them, and they were running off an NAD reciever. (I think the second or third one from the top)

    Personally I thought they were very brite with good detail. As detailed as the LSi line from polk, but much briter. If you paired the right electronics with it, and put it in the right room, I am sure it would be comparable to the LSi15's.

    They were not my cup of tea, but I would rate the quality as similar but with a different sound. I would say moving from the LSi's to the studio series would be considered a lateral move. With the correct electronics or room, either one could sound better than the other.

    Michael
    Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
    Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
    Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
    Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
    Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
    Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms)
  • cmy330go
    cmy330go Posts: 2,341
    edited October 2006
    I'm not personally a big fan. I have spent a fair amount of time over the last few years auditioning a number of paradigm speakers. Anything from their Monitor, and Studio series, and have also spent quite a bit of time with the Signature S2 in my own system.

    I've never been able to warm up to any of them. They do have their strong points, such as great build quality (cabinets, and drivers), very detailed sound, strong dynamics, ability to play loud without straining. However that being said I have always been bored with the overall presentation. They just seem too analytical and sterile, maybe even dull. For me they just lack character, and warmth. I never really felt like I was drawn into the music. With other brands such as Polk, Energy, Magnepan, Epos, AAD, etc... I find I enjoy the sound of the speakers but eventually reach a point where I can forget about the speakers and just enjoy the tunes. For some reason I was never able to do that with any Paradigms I have listened to. I've really tried to like them but just can't get there.

    I also agree with McLoki, they do tend toward the bright side. In fact with certain material they can be downright punishing.

    In regards their subs, I have only ever heard the Servo-15 which everyone seems to rave about. What little bit I heard I was quite impressed with. They were actually paired with a large set of Magnepans (don't recall which model), and I must admit that it blended beautifully. It was near impossible to tell where the speakers dropped off and the sub picked up. It seemed to reach quite low as well.

    I'll shut up now. Just my 2 cents worth.

    Later!
    HT
    Mits WD-65737, DirecTV, Oppo DV-970HD, XBOX ONE, Yamaha RX-A1030, Parasound Halo A23, Rotel RB-985, Music Hall MMF-7, Parasound PPH-100, LSi-15, LSi-C, LSi-FX, LSi-7, PSW-1000, Monster HTS2600

    2 CH
    Parasound Halo P3, Parasound Halo A21, Sutherland Ph.D, VPI Classic 3 w/ 3D arm & Soundsmith Aida Cartridge, Arcam CD72T, B&W 802 S3, Monster HTS2500,
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited October 2006
    I've owned a lot of Paradigm over my limited years. Good, solid speakers. Easy to drive, easy to setup and place, somewhat forgiving in 'bad' rooms.

    For all intents and purposes, it's a Canadian Polk. Similar sound - but also shares something else with Polk over time. Even the entry level series respond VERY well to a good back end. A few extra $ spent on amp / pre / source make a WORLD of difference. GIGO, if you follow.

    Paradigm has, and hopefully will continue to, offer real value and real performance in the speaker industry. I'd have no problem Ronco'ing a pair of Pdimes in a hardcore 2ch rig.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited October 2006
    I own a Paradigm Sub Servo-15 LOVE IT, Killer sub.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Nelson57
    Nelson57 Posts: 190
    edited October 2006
    Zero and Russ both capture some my thoughts as well.

    I own setups from both Polk and Paradigm and enjoy them both. Never used any of their subs but they do have some solid sub offerings.

    Right now in the Paradigm Monitor Series vs the Polk Rti Series, I would give a slight edge to the Polk Csi5 over the Paradigm CC-370 center channel, however Paradigm will be releasing a new Monitor Series v.5 soon, and they will have new a center channel lineup that looks quite promising.

    Both Polk and Paradigm put out quality products and I have no problem recommending either.
    Main theater: Paradigm Studio 100's v4 L/R, CC690 Center, ADP 590 x4 Surrounds. Dual Outlaw LFM-EX-1's, Yamaha Aventage RX-A1010 as Processor, Anthem PVA-7 Amp

    Secondary System: Polk RTi 6 L/R, CSi3, Center, FXi3 x4 Surrounds, Def-Tech Supercube II, Pioneer Elite VSX-23 Receiver
  • surfntomm
    surfntomm Posts: 185
    edited October 2006
    ive heard the studio 40 v.3 and those things have got me hooked. i currently only have rti 70's csi5 and rti6 but the paradigms offer a much more full and rich sound but then again i was reading that the studio line matches up better with the lsi line. id say that the paradigm line is a bit pricier than the polk lineup but they each have their on dedicated following. my next speakers will definitely either be the lsi 7,9 or studio 40's if i can ever find a good deal on them
  • dkg999
    dkg999 Posts: 5,647
    edited October 2006
    Recently bought the Paradigm Studio Reference 20v3 for a bedroom 2 ch system. Based on my requirements, they beat out the Polk LSi9, Totem, EPOS, and Usher speakers I was comparing to. Open soundstage, great imaging, not picky on placement, were the winning features. They also sounded a lot less "boxy". Give them a listen, only your ears can really make a decision.
    DKG999
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited October 2006
    I'm a fan, they have an addictive neutrality and extremely well sorted/balanced crossover (Ref Studio series), albeit a touch warm on the treble. My 2 favorites are 40's and 100's.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • dkg999
    dkg999 Posts: 5,647
    edited October 2006
    Those of us who grew up on farms before we became concerned with hearing protection like a slightly warm treble :o
    DKG999
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC
  • ahorvitz
    ahorvitz Posts: 235
    edited October 2006
    I had a Paradigm Servo 15 sub on loan from a friend for about a month. Great sub!
    Main Rig
    Pioneer Elite SC-05, Rotel RMB-1075
    RT800i, CS400i, RT35i, FXi50, Klipsch RSW-12
    Pioneer Elite DV F-07, PS3, Wii
    Monster HTS 3500 MKII
    SC Analog 2, BJC Speaker Wire
    Samsung HL61A650

    2nd Rig

    Pioneer Elite VSX-56txi, Pioneer Elite DV-47a
    Cambridge Soundworks, MC150 (Center), MC100 x 4, Mirage LF-150

    Office

    Adcom GTP-400, Adcom GFA-535II, (need a quality CDP), RT55i
  • billbillw
    billbillw Posts: 6,863
    edited October 2006
    I auditioned a pair of Ref Studio 40v2 last week. Nice sounding speaker, great build quality. Didn't really have a chance to a/b them, but they were definetly up to the quality of Polk. I'd like to give them an extended listen (may be in the works) to compare them to my classic Monitor 5A and some of the other Polk RT series I have. One things for sure, the Ref Studio series hold their value pretty darn well, at least for the near future anyway.
    For rig details, see my profile. Nothing here anymore...
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited October 2006
    ahorvitz wrote:
    I had a Paradigm Servo 15 sub on loan from a friend for about a month. Great sub!


    Sweet Nice sub :)

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • Home Theatre
    Home Theatre Posts: 469
    edited October 2006
    I like Polk better.
    Everything I own burned in the fire!!!!!!!!!!
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    Hey those paradigm do look nice!! But do they 'kick' when it comes to music like a rti's i was wondering myself. I'm looking at the Paradigm performance Focus or titan which polk line the r or RTi do these compare to? and the mini monitor or the monitor 3 which polk do these compare too?? would a nad C320bee be able supply these or starve them???
    Chicomorales:)
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited October 2006
    The C320 will drive any of those speakers just fine.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    really what about the polk rti6's
    Chicomorales:)
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    this might seem kinda dumb but whats the difference between the C320 and C325 i really dont see any??
    Chicomorales:)
  • Home Theatre
    Home Theatre Posts: 469
    edited October 2006
    How would you compare the paradigm subs vs velodyne???


    price?
    Everything I own burned in the fire!!!!!!!!!!
  • markmarc
    markmarc Posts: 2,309
    edited October 2006
    Don't have any experience with sub comparison.

    I have to disagree with those who match the LSi to the Signature series. Sorry, but the Signatures are a whole notch higher. The LSi's and the Studios are quite comparable (sound/price). The Rti's and the Paradigm Monitors are of the same quality, although the RTi's have a much higher fit and finish since it's real veneer. The LSi7's to the Studio 20's, LSi9's to the Studio 40's, etc., etc.. The biggest difference is that the Studios are an easier drive on amps than the LSi's. After that, it's a personal choice
    Review Site_ (((AudioPursuit)))
    Founder/Publisher Affordable$$Audio 2006-13.
    Former Staff Member TONEAudio
    2 Ch. System
    Amplifiers: Parasound Halo P6 pre, Vista Audio i34, Peachtree amp500, Adcom GFP-565 GFA-535ii, 545ii, 555ii
    Digital: SimAudio HAD230 DAC, iMac 20in/Amarra,
    Speakers: Paradigm Performa F75, Magnepan .7, Totem Model 1's, ACI Emerald XL, Celestion Si Stands. Totem Dreamcatcher sub
    Analog: Technics SL-J2 w/Pickering 3000D, SimAudio LP5.3 phono pre
    Cable/Wires: Cardas, AudioArt, Shunyata Venom 3
  • Home Theatre
    Home Theatre Posts: 469
    edited October 2006
    I heard the Monitor 7's, I think for Classic rock the Rti's blew away the monitor 7's.
    Everything I own burned in the fire!!!!!!!!!!
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    Which rti model where you comparing them to???
    Chicomorales:)
  • Home Theatre
    Home Theatre Posts: 469
    edited October 2006
    Rti-8 and 10's
    Everything I own burned in the fire!!!!!!!!!!
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    what do the 7's go for their a dealor quote me 600 for the 5's the rti 8's were like 598
    Chicomorales:)
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    what about the Paradigm ultra cube10 or 12 fits in small spaces...........
    Chicomorales:)
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited October 2006
    I heard the Monitor 7's, I think for Classic rock the Rti's blew away the monitor 7's.


    you can't compare the two.. two different eras of speakers.
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • criverajr
    criverajr Posts: 1,675
    edited October 2006
    Polksters,

    I have to agree with markmarc the Studio line from Paradigm will stand toe to toe with the LSI line from Polk, but much easier to drive, but the Signature series will blow the LSI Series out of the water. I have run the Studio 60/100 which I have a pair of each and the LSI 9/15 I actually like the sound of the Paradigms a little better, to me a bit more foward with a larger sound stage and dig a little deeper. The Lsi would win for 2 channel. But again the Signature Series is a step above and the Maple finish is absolutly stunning.

    CRj
  • Chicomoralessxm
    Chicomoralessxm Posts: 417
    edited October 2006
    yep they do have a sweet finish those sig's but what are the paradigms finished in in not polk has the sweet looking veneer on the rti and lsi line but what about the monitor and studio or the performance line from paradigm anyone know??
    Chicomorales:)
  • cmy330go
    cmy330go Posts: 2,341
    edited October 2006
    criverajr wrote:
    Polksters,

    ....but the Signature series will blow the LSI Series out of the water.......

    CRj

    Personally I would have to disagree with that. I spent a lot of time comparing the Signature S2 and the LSi9s. I honestly preferred the 9s. The signatures were just too edgy. They almost had a slight hint of horn sound to them. Also the mids were just too forward to me. So much so that they made the low end seem weak.

    I'm not trying to say I'm right and that CRj is wrong. I'm Just stating a difference in opinion. It's really something that each person has to decide for them self.

    Later
    HT
    Mits WD-65737, DirecTV, Oppo DV-970HD, XBOX ONE, Yamaha RX-A1030, Parasound Halo A23, Rotel RB-985, Music Hall MMF-7, Parasound PPH-100, LSi-15, LSi-C, LSi-FX, LSi-7, PSW-1000, Monster HTS2600

    2 CH
    Parasound Halo P3, Parasound Halo A21, Sutherland Ph.D, VPI Classic 3 w/ 3D arm & Soundsmith Aida Cartridge, Arcam CD72T, B&W 802 S3, Monster HTS2500,