New Polk entry level series

2»

Comments

  • aaharvel
    aaharvel Posts: 4,489
    edited August 2006
    While I hate seeing this constantly... I dont understand this quote...
    Its bad for Polk to change their low fi models everything 6 months - a year..
    But its OK for Polk to change their mid fi models FIVE times with lateral shift and cosmetic upgrades over the past...............8 years or more?

    Hmmmm

    The current rti line has been out for about 2years now, and no re-design (cosmetic or performance) seems to be in the future. The Lsi line is almost 4years old with no re-design in the near future. But when it DOES happen, at least the rti/lsi lines change or at least improves on it's specs, build-quality, sound characteristics, internal bracing, etc.. thus differenating it performance-wise from it's earlier iterations. Meaning, the lines evolve. Just as much (if not more so) in perfomance and build quality than simply in cosmetics. Take a look at the 6month rope-a-dope of the Rseries, Mseries, and new Rseries (all of which are being sold at once) and tell me if you really think that's true.
    H/K Signature 2.1+235
    Jungson MagicBoat II
    Revel Performa M-20
    Velodyne cht-10 sub
    Rega P1 Turntable

    "People working at Polk Audio must sit around the office and just laugh their balls off reading many of these comments." -Lush
  • adam2434
    adam2434 Posts: 995
    edited August 2006
    I'm not saying this is intentional on Polk's part, but I do see a positive outcome from Polk's changing the entry level series more frequently. When a new series comes out, the older series can be had for a tremendous discount (think the Outpost deals on the older R series). This puts Polk speakers in a lot of homes.

    Folks snatch them up at these prices and get hooked on Polk. Then, when the upgraded bug hits, they often look at the more costly Polk lines. Also, once a loyal Polk fan, folks will recommend Polk to friends and family. This "spreading the word" phenomenon is strengthened when friends/family hear the entry level series and think "you got sound this good for so little money". These are typically average, non-audiophile consumers who think that Bose is high end.

    Bottom line is that cheap, decent sounding speakers create and spread brand loyalty.
    5.1 and 2.0 ch Basement Media Room: Outlaw 975/Emotiva DC-1/Rotel RB-1582 MKII/Rotel RB-1552/Audiosource Amp 3/Polk LS90, CS400i, FX500i/Outlaw X-12, LFM-1/JVD DLA-HD250/Da-Lite 100" HCCV/Sony ES BDP/Sonos Connect. DC-1/RB-1582 MKII/Sonos Connect also feed Polk 7C in garage or Dayton IO655 on patio.
    2.1 ch Basement Gym: Denon AVR-2807/Klipsch Forte I or NHT SB2/JBL SUB 550P x 2/Chromecast Audio.
    2.0 ch Living Room: Rotel RX-1052/Emotiva DC-1/Klipsch RF-7 III/Sony ES BDP/LG 65" LED.
    2.0 ch Semi-portable: Klipsch Powergate/NHT SB3/Chromecast Audio.
    Kitchen: Sonos Play5.
  • dipiazza
    dipiazza Posts: 363
    edited August 2006
    adam2434 wrote:
    I'm not saying this is intentional on Polk's part, but a do see a positive outcome from Polk's changing the entry level series more frequently. When a new series comes out, the older series can be had for a tremendous discount (think the Outpost deals on the older R series). This puts Polk speakers in a lot of homes.



    Good point.
    Terps Swimming!
    HT Setup
    TV: Vizio VX32L
    Reciever: Pioneer VSX-D914
    HD-DVD Player: Toshiba HD-A2
    Fronts: Polk R50s
    Surounds: Polk R30s
    Center: Polk R20's
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39PCi

    2CH Setup
    Integrated: Onix SP3 Tube
    CD Player: Sony CDP-CX355
    Speakers: Onix Strata Mini in PR Finish
    Signal Cable: Classic Speaker, Analog 1 IC

    Headphones
    Grado SR 60, Bang & Olufsen A8, Shure e3

    Other Stuff in Use
    Onix xls, Dual Onix x-subs, Onix Ref .5, Dahlquist M903, Teac A-1D, Marantz 1060
  • zombie boy 2000
    zombie boy 2000 Posts: 6,641
    edited August 2006
    adam2434 wrote:

    Folks snatch them up at these prices and get hooked on Polk. Then, when the upgraded bug hits, they often look at the more costly Polk lines. Also, once a loyal Polk fan, folks will recommend Polk to friends and family. This "spreading the word" phenomenon is strengthened when friends/family hear the entry level series and think "you got sound this good for so little money". These are typically average, non-audiophile consumers who think that Bose is high end.

    Bottom line is that cheap, decent sounding speakers create and spread brand loyalty.

    Slap a gold star on him and make him a grilled cheese:D
    I never had it like this where I grew up. But I send my kids here because the fact is you go to one of the best schools in the country: Rushmore. Now, for some of you it doesn't matter. You were born rich and you're going to stay rich. But here's my advice to the rest of you: Take dead aim on the rich boys. Get them in the crosshairs and take them down. Just remember, they can buy anything but they can't buy backbone. Don't let them forget it. Thank you.Herman Blume - Rushmore
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited August 2006
    The CSi20 is technically 'the' match for the 2nd edition R series. The first run of R series center was the CS101 (R1 / R2).

    Polk has 'spread out' among distributors now, and this line may be catering to a vendor OTHER than Circuit City (think back to the Eosone / Best Buy days). Entry models never get long in the tooth - they have to stay fresh, and new - on the other hand, the high end lines NEED to last while - you can't sell many $2000 speakers if they are going to updated / changed every 6 - 12 months.

    B&W for example, the higher end lines, CM / 700 / 800 - they design the speakers to be competitive in the market for 6 to 8 years, without changing a thing. When they do a redesign, they DO A REDESIGN - top to bottom.

    Cheers,
    Russ
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • adam2434
    adam2434 Posts: 995
    edited August 2006
    Huh, I always thought the CSi25 was the match for R15/30/50 based on the photo and description from Outpost.com below. The grill in the picture has the same angled aesthetics as the R15/30/50. Polk's photo looks like a totally different speaker, more like the CSM (matching center for the M series).
    http://shop3.outpost.com/{IBXjXMF7x51cwCRNliSEPg**.node2}/product/4463996;jsessionid=IBXjXMF7x51cwCRNliSEPg**.node2?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG

    Anyway, what does the CSi25 match?
    5.1 and 2.0 ch Basement Media Room: Outlaw 975/Emotiva DC-1/Rotel RB-1582 MKII/Rotel RB-1552/Audiosource Amp 3/Polk LS90, CS400i, FX500i/Outlaw X-12, LFM-1/JVD DLA-HD250/Da-Lite 100" HCCV/Sony ES BDP/Sonos Connect. DC-1/RB-1582 MKII/Sonos Connect also feed Polk 7C in garage or Dayton IO655 on patio.
    2.1 ch Basement Gym: Denon AVR-2807/Klipsch Forte I or NHT SB2/JBL SUB 550P x 2/Chromecast Audio.
    2.0 ch Living Room: Rotel RX-1052/Emotiva DC-1/Klipsch RF-7 III/Sony ES BDP/LG 65" LED.
    2.0 ch Semi-portable: Klipsch Powergate/NHT SB3/Chromecast Audio.
    Kitchen: Sonos Play5.
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited August 2006
    I hope this will eventually replace the monitor series. The current monitor lineup is the worst sounding polk line in the almost 8 years I've been selling them.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
  • alibabwish
    alibabwish Posts: 12
    edited August 2006
    adam2434 wrote:
    I'm not saying this is intentional on Polk's part, but I do see a positive outcome from Polk's changing the entry level series more frequently. When a new series comes out, the older series can be had for a tremendous discount (think the Outpost deals on the older R series). This puts Polk speakers in a lot of homes.

    Folks snatch them up at these prices and get hooked on Polk. Then, when the upgraded bug hits, they often look at the more costly Polk lines. Also, once a loyal Polk fan, folks will recommend Polk to friends and family. This "spreading the word" phenomenon is strengthened when friends/family hear the entry level series and think "you got sound this good for so little money". These are typically average, non-audiophile consumers who think that Bose is high end.

    Bottom line is that cheap, decent sounding speakers create and spread brand loyalty.

    i couldnt agree more, i just bought my first pair of polk, monitor 40's for cc, which i guess is considered an entry level type speaker, i mean i didnt exactly buy it for the same reason adam said, but i thought bose was good until i compared the bose 301s to these m40s i have now and they sounded horrible, but ill admitt im hooked on polk and home audio now but have severe budgett restarints considering im in college. adams answer could not be more logical though and i agree with it 100%
  • brijenjas
    brijenjas Posts: 311
    edited August 2006
    adam2434 wrote:
    Folks snatch them up at these prices and get hooked on Polk. Then, when the upgraded bug hits, they often look at the more costly Polk lines. Also, once a loyal Polk fan, folks will recommend Polk to friends and family. This "spreading the word" phenomenon is strengthened when friends/family hear the entry level series and think "you got sound this good for so little money". These are typically average, non-audiophile consumers who think that Bose is high end.

    Bottom line is that cheap, decent sounding speakers create and spread brand loyalty.

    I'll admit it.

    This is exactly how I was "hooked";) and I'm glad I was.

    Bougth r50's for a great price, liked the sound, visited here quite often and was convinced to upgrade within a year.

    I am/was? your typical non-audiophile customer(although I never thought bose was high end).:(
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,782
    edited August 2006
    aaharvel wrote:
    The current rti line has been out for about 2years now, and no re-design (cosmetic or performance) seems to be in the future. The Lsi line is almost 4years old with no re-design in the near future. But when it DOES happen, at least the rti/lsi lines change or at least improves on it's specs, build-quality, sound characteristics, internal bracing, etc.. thus differenating it performance-wise from it's earlier iterations. Meaning, the lines evolve. Just as much (if not more so) in perfomance and build quality than simply in cosmetics. Take a look at the 6month rope-a-dope of the Rseries, Mseries, and new Rseries (all of which are being sold at once) and tell me if you really think that's true.

    You will beat yourself to death trying to argue with me about the RT series and what I think about it.

    I think its a great series. However, the sound differences between the first and current are not better changes. Infact, they are lateral shifts, its just like you buying a comparable product to Polk and it just sounds and looks and little different. There are alot of members here that will tell you the first RT line is the best of the RT series thats been out.

    I hope the next RT series that comes out isnt called the RT series. It is time to move on, IMO. We dont need 5 more versions of this line up....

    Where does the madness end? lol
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.