Bipole, Dipole, or bookshelf speaker for surrounds?

pblanc
pblanc Posts: 261
edited July 2006 in Speakers
Who prefers conventional speakers for surrounds to specially designed surround speakers with bipole and/or dipole capability. If you do why? Have you tried both?
Post edited by pblanc on

Comments

  • brettw22
    brettw22 Posts: 7,623
    edited July 2006
    Direct firing are more finicky with placement. I have always had bi/dipole speakers for side surrounds. If I was using a pair of spears as back surrounds in conjunction with side surrounds, I'd probably put direct firing in back.
    comment comment comment comment. bitchy.
  • SKsolutions
    SKsolutions Posts: 1,820
    edited July 2006
    Tripole. It depends on the size and shape of the room. You can create null zones in a smaller room with Dipole, or use a larger rooms advatage of space and surface area reflection/refraction to create the desired effects with Bipole. Or you could just buy one that has the phase switch to change from push/push to push/pull (in phase, out phase).
    -Ignorance is strength -
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited July 2006
    I prefer direct radiating but I also listen to a lot of music so diffused is bad. I wouldn't mind testing out some LSiFX's in my system just for giggles but I love how it sounds with 9's all the way around.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited July 2006
    i use a can or worms for my surrounds. :p













    sorry, but this is probably the most over asked question on planet earth.


    for the record i use bipole surrounds. ;)
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • Skynut
    Skynut Posts: 2,967
    edited July 2006
    I would agree with brettw22, I use the di/bipole for the rear duty now but if I had a larger room I would use my RT2000p's for the rear.
    Skynut
    SOPA® Founder
    The system Almost there
    DVD Onkyo DV-SP802
    Sunfire Theater Grand II
    Sherbourn 7/2100
    Panamax 5510 power conditioner (for electronics)
    2 PSAudio UPC-200 power conditioners (for amps)
    Front L/R RT3000p (Bi-Wired)
    Center CS1000p (Bi-Wired) (under the television)
    Center RT2000p's (Bi-Wired) (on each side of the television)
    Sur FX1000
    SVS ultra plus 2

    www.ShadetreesMachineShop.com
    Thanks for looking
  • josh_parsons626
    josh_parsons626 Posts: 219
    edited July 2006
    I have my Paradigm Cinema dipole's on my back wall. Can I put these little teeny tiny HTIB like surrounds. The only thing on the back as far as a brand would go is "Universal", that's all I know. But where can I put them to be surround "rear"? My surrounds right now are about 3/4 the way up on my back wall. I have 36" stands to put them on so where would be the best place to put them? Also I dont know if I said anything but they're direct firing
    Don't forget to look at My Home Theater :D

    Receiver - Onkyo TX-SR503
    Fronts - Polk Audio Monitor 40
    Center - Polk Audio CS1
    Surrounds - Paradigm Cinema ADP
    Subwoofer - Velodyne VRP-1200
  • josh_parsons626
    josh_parsons626 Posts: 219
    edited July 2006
    Hey I was just thinking also, I'm doing all monitor series and since they dont have dipole's how about having 40's (just like up front) for surrounds and another CS2 center channel for rear surround? And have them all lined up perfectly along the back wall. What do you think that would sound like?
    Don't forget to look at My Home Theater :D

    Receiver - Onkyo TX-SR503
    Fronts - Polk Audio Monitor 40
    Center - Polk Audio CS1
    Surrounds - Paradigm Cinema ADP
    Subwoofer - Velodyne VRP-1200