LC265i benchmarks

Kurtster
Kurtster Posts: 4
edited May 2006 in Speakers
Has anyone found a place where I might be able to see how flat the LC265i is across the frequency spectrum?

I am debating whether or not to replace my SDA-1Cs, FX500i surrounds and CS1000p center with a new set of 5 LC265i in-walls with enclosure case, or whether to pick up a set of Blue Sky THX PM3 certified studio monitors.

the Blue Skys are darn near flat across the spectrum. If the Polks are pretty close, I'd rather have them to stick with the brand, and conceal the speakers more easily.

Anyone dones this kind of testing and posted the results online?
Kurtster's Car
Polk MMC690
Polk db6500
JL Audio Stealthbox 10" sub
Alpine CDA-9857
iPod 60GB video

Kurtster's Crib
Polk SDA-1c
Polk cs1000p
Polk fx500i
Polk PSW202
JBL PS120 sub x 2
JBL MPA400 Pro amp
Denon AVR-5700
Denon POA 2400
Panasonic AE900U
Prismasonic 1200m Anamorphic lens
90" Stewart Filmscreen (2.35:1 AR)
Post edited by Kurtster on

Comments

  • Zen Dragon
    Zen Dragon Posts: 501
    edited May 2006
    Your best bet is to do some extensive google searching. The SDA-1C's use a stock tweeter that has a known resonance at about 13KHz which produces a spike. I am not sure how much of this spike makes it ultimately to the listener as Polk does appear to have used a notch filter in the upper tweeter circuit. Some members have upgraded the tweeters to the replacement RD0194-A's with a flatter frequency response and claimed great results.
    Other than that I am not familiar with the speaker you are comparing the SDA-1C to.
    The Family
    Polk SDA-1C's
    Polk SDA-2
    Polk Monitor 10B's
    Polk LSI-9's
    Polk Monitor 5's
    Polk 5 jr's
    Polk PSW-450 Sub
    Polk CSI40 Center

    Do not one day come to die, and discover you have not lived.
    This is pretty f***ed up right here.
  • Kurtster
    Kurtster Posts: 4
    edited May 2006
    Here is the measurement data on the Blue Sky studio monitors.
    http://www.abluesky.com/m/p/bs50021a.pdf

    This is the kind of info I'm looking for on the LC265i

    I don't expect the information to be too much different, but if there are some really big spikes, or other anomolies, it would be good to know if I'll need to EQ (and if so by how much) for flatter response.
    Kurtster's Car
    Polk MMC690
    Polk db6500
    JL Audio Stealthbox 10" sub
    Alpine CDA-9857
    iPod 60GB video

    Kurtster's Crib
    Polk SDA-1c
    Polk cs1000p
    Polk fx500i
    Polk PSW202
    JBL PS120 sub x 2
    JBL MPA400 Pro amp
    Denon AVR-5700
    Denon POA 2400
    Panasonic AE900U
    Prismasonic 1200m Anamorphic lens
    90" Stewart Filmscreen (2.35:1 AR)
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited May 2006
    polkcs@polkaudio.com

    Larry Chanin, a Polkie, may have some more information as well. He is using a couple of the same speakers in his HT. Do a search for his name....
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • Larry Chanin
    Larry Chanin Posts: 601
    edited May 2006
    Kurtster wrote:
    Here is the measurement data on the Blue Sky studio monitors.
    http://www.abluesky.com/m/p/bs50021a.pdf

    This is the kind of info I'm looking for on the LC265i

    I don't expect the information to be too much different, but if there are some really big spikes, or other anomolies, it would be good to know if I'll need to EQ (and if so by how much) for flatter response.

    Hi Kurt,

    I hope the information I provided via email was of some assistance.

    However, I don't know how to interpret the Blue Sky response curves. They all show equalized responses. Does the monitor come with built-in equalization? If not, I'm not sure how you would go about comparing response curves between different speakers.

    The LC265i's are very flat, but probably not as flat as those equalized curves.
    As I mentioned in my email, in real life, positioned near the side walls as your application seems to require, the Polks might be flatter when using the Distance Toggle Switch.

    I'll post the LC265i response, perhaps some of the other Club members might care to comment.

    Larry

    PS. The scale on the attachment is incorrect, the 1000 Hz label is really 10,000 hz.