Interconnect question

AsSiMiLaTeD
AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,726
edited April 2006 in 2 Channel Audio
I bought some inexpensive MIT analog ICs on here a few months ago from Mark, have a question.

I'm going to be using these in my 2 channel system, which consists of the Toshiba 3980, Parasound PH/P 850 preamp, and Teac A-L700P amp. This means I have two sets of ICs in use, one going from source to preamp, the other going from preamp to amp.

My question - which one of these has more impact on the overall sound, is one more of a factor than the other? I have the set of MIT ICs, and another set of lower end Monster ICs - which one should I put where?

Logic tells me that it doesn't matter which I use where, that the bottleneck is going to be the Monster IC, no matter where I use it, but I'm curious.

I would just hook it up both ways and see which I like better and may end up doing that anyway, but it is a PAIN to deal with hookup because of where everything is set up, so wanted to see if anyone here has any advice...or maybe a set of cables that would be a good match with my MIT (like another set of MIT) they want to sell...
Post edited by AsSiMiLaTeD on

Comments

  • Skynut
    Skynut Posts: 2,967
    edited March 2006
    My guess would be that you are right. the monsters will be the bottleneck however if it were me I think I would put the MIT's between the Toshiba and the Parasound and let the monsters do the pre to the amp work.

    FWIW
    Skynut
    SOPA® Founder
    The system Almost there
    DVD Onkyo DV-SP802
    Sunfire Theater Grand II
    Sherbourn 7/2100
    Panamax 5510 power conditioner (for electronics)
    2 PSAudio UPC-200 power conditioners (for amps)
    Front L/R RT3000p (Bi-Wired)
    Center CS1000p (Bi-Wired) (under the television)
    Center RT2000p's (Bi-Wired) (on each side of the television)
    Sur FX1000
    SVS ultra plus 2

    www.ShadetreesMachineShop.com
    Thanks for looking
  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,726
    edited March 2006
    Bump, any thoughts guys?
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited March 2006
    I agree with you -- it probably doesn't matter. If you have a weak link (ughh...Monster IC), it's gonna affect everything else.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • dorokusai
    dorokusai Posts: 25,577
    edited March 2006
    I prefer to have the same series of manufacturer when it comes to interconnects.

    I think Shack mentioned it in another thread...that if you don't have the same cables in the signal path, how will you REALLY know if they are better or worse? It's all subjective anyways, but at least you will have a given if the cables are all alike.
    CTC BBQ Amplifier, Sonic Frontiers Line3 Pre-Amplifier and Wadia 581 SACD player. Speakers? Always changing but for now, Mission Argonauts I picked up for $50 bucks, mint.
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited March 2006
    I have a 1.5 meter set of MIT Terminator I could let go on the cheap cheap.

    RT1
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited March 2006
    Or, I have some higher end Monster I could let go on the not so cheap!!

    RT1
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,335
    edited April 2006
    I've asked this same question to IC manufacturer's and they all had the same answer "Put your best cable between the source and the preamp"
    Carl

  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited April 2006
    Polkmanic

    I had this same concern a while back.. got a new high quality interconnect and didn't know where to install it. First I placed in between the CD player and pre amp. Little noticable difference.

    Then i installed it between the pre amp and amp. and BAM! that made a big difference. I like using the best quality interconnects i can buy within my budget. Sounds like those MIT's will work well for you if you can also replace the Monster with another set of MIT's.

    The reason i prefer to have the best quailty IC between the pre and amp is because that way no matter what source you play, it will benefit from the IC because everything had to go thru the pre amp before it reached the amp.

    If you place your good MIT between the CDP and your pre amp, only the CDP benefits from the high quailty MIT IC. As mentioned already... you do want all the same quaility IC's throughout your entire system to match... so that way there is no weak link.
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin: