New speaker cables needed?

Early B.
Early B. Posts: 7,900
A friend of mine had a system setup with speakers that were bi-wireable. He got new speakers that are not bi-wireable, but is using the bi-wired speaker cables. He has both ends hooked up to each binding post via banana and bare wire. Is this OK? Would there be any sonic improvement or other reason for him to use a non-biwireable cable?
HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

"God grooves with tubes."
Post edited by Early B. on

Comments

  • BrentMcGhee
    BrentMcGhee Posts: 548
    edited February 2006
    Not a problem at all. I would still get some non bi-wire cables though just because i am anal like that and would want everything to look nice :)
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2006
    Not a problem at all. I would still get some non bi-wire cables though just because i am anal like that and would want everything to look nice :)

    So would I. Does that mean I'm anal, too? ****.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • BrentMcGhee
    BrentMcGhee Posts: 548
    edited February 2006
    ^ yep :)

    It's not perfect until it's perfect... and then it's not perfect