Bang & Olefson (B&O) vs. Polk vs. B&W vs. Bose vs. etc.

crazy
crazy Posts: 443
edited February 2006 in Speakers
So we've had several discussion about what're great speakers and what's absolute crap (Bose). But I'm curious to know how folks rate them against each other. What if there was a world heavy weight title - who would win? How would Bose compare to say the Polk Monitors series etc.

So here goes ...

Round 1

Bose Lifestyle vs. Polk Audio Monitor Series

Round 2

B&W vs. B&O

Round 3

B&W 6 series vs. Polk Audio RTi

Round 4

Polk Audio LSi vs. B&W 804s
Distant Dream - A New Beginning
www.distantdream.com
(Now also available on iTunes)
Post edited by crazy on

Comments

  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited February 2006
    How stupid.

    You can't have a champion based on personal preference. Get off the board and ask the general populous walking down the street and guess which answer you will get.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • LuSh
    LuSh Posts: 887
    edited February 2006
    what Russ said.
  • Joey_V
    Joey_V Posts: 8,586
    edited February 2006
    BO has some super speaker... never heard it before but I think it is the BeoLab 5 or something. I think it costs like around 10-15K, not sure. I heard that people said it was good, but I havent heard it personally so I cant comment rightfully.

    BW has some awesome speakers, but I dont really enjoy their sub $4000 models and so do most people. This gives BW the stereotype that it is too expensive for what it offers. However, if you have the money to scale up to their new DIAMOND speakers (803D, 802D, 801D, 800D), you are definitely an elite in my eyes.

    Polk LSi will always have a special place in my audio-experience. Love the sound, no matter how many other better speakers I've heard. There is something organic and comforting about the LSi sound. Love it.

    Bose Lifestyle shouldnt even be in this conversation. Poorly made, poorly priced, and poorly voiced. These things dont sound great. My opinion of Bose is that they are a company of yesteryear... back before forums and educated consumers. Nowadays, you can get a similarly sounding product HTIB for much much less... and yet Bose continues to market their systems like they did when they were the only ones in the HTIB market. Do they sound good? Not really. Are they listenable? Sure, but very very colored - and I think intentionally too. Are they worth it? NO.

    Polk RTi - solid solid speakers. Not as adept with music as they are with brute force HT applications. I find them a little too bright and the midrange isnt at the same level as the LSi. However, they are still solid and should be a proud part of a polkie's system if possible.

    BW 6 series.... too expensive for what you get. That said, these are solid speakers as well. Compares well with the RTi.
    Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R
  • Joey_V
    Joey_V Posts: 8,586
    edited February 2006
    I didnt know this was about a world champion.... I mustve read too fast.

    For me, if I were to entertain your idea of a "world champion" from your list, I would choose the BW 800D. But that costs a lot of cash and I'm not taking that into account.
    Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R
  • Holydoc
    Holydoc Posts: 1,048
    edited February 2006
    I have only listened to the Polk series and the Bose. I have no experience with the B&W.

    Bose seems to be shallow, like they are missing something. That something is the mid and bass. It gives you the impression that you are listening to a pocket radio.

    The monitor series sounded like my first original system. It sounded good and complete but just did not seem to get my blood going. To my ears, they were not precise and articulate. They sounded good but did not seem to have a definite edge to them.

    The RTi series was very precise. Notes seemed to jump out the speakers like the artist was in the room with you. HT applications made you leap and cringe at all the right places. For unplugged performances, I felt like I was sitting beside Eric Clapton.

    The LSi series sounded nearly identical to my ears as the RTi. With a switch box, I could not tell when the salesman clicked from one speaker to the next. The salesman would even go as far as clicking the same speaker on a couple times in a roll so that he could test my ears.

    *** Note of interest *** This review of the LSi's was done using the same exact setup as the RTi series in a showroom. Since I knew little about speaker requirements when I listened to these speakers at that time, I did not question whether there was enough power going to those speakers, their spacing on the floor, or even if they had the same wiring. This test may be inadequate for judging purposes.
    Holydoc (Home Theatre Lover)
    __________________________________________
    Panasonic -50PX600U 50" Plasma
    Onkyo -TX-NR901 Receiver
    Oppo -Oppo 980HD Universal DVD Player
    Outlaw -770 (7x200watt) Amplifier
    PolkAudio - RTi12 (Left and Right)
    PolkAudio - CSi5 (Center)
    PolkAudio - FXi3 (Back and Surround)
    SVS - PB-12/Plus (Subwoofer)
    Bluejean Cables - Interconnects
    Logitech Harmony 880 - Remote
  • thehaens@cox.net
    thehaens@cox.net Posts: 1,012
    edited February 2006
    RuSsMaN wrote:
    How stupid.

    .

    He is merely posting an opinion based thread. Geez give some of the members a break.

    Crazy - I don't have any experience with all these different speakers, in other words really never got a chance to really sit down and listen to all of them with the same source, music, etc to really compare them. Hopefully someone on this forum can give you a better conclusion to your post.

    Scott
  • Joey_V
    Joey_V Posts: 8,586
    edited February 2006
    Holydoc wrote:
    The RTi series was very precise. Notes seemed to jump out the speakers like the artist was in the room with you. HT applications made you leap and cringe at all the right places. For unplugged performances, I felt like I was sitting beside Eric Clapton.

    The LSi series sounded nearly identical to my ears as the RTi. With a switch box, I could not tell when the salesman clicked from one speaker to the next. The salesman would even go as far as clicking the same speaker on a couple times in a roll so that he could test my ears.

    *** Note of interest *** This review of the LSi's was done using the same exact setup as the RTi series in a showroom. Since I knew little about speaker requirements when I listened to these speakers at that time, I did not question whether there was enough power going to those speakers, their spacing on the floor, or even if they had the same wiring. This test may be inadequate for judging purposes.

    Contrast to HD's experience with the LSi/RTi, I can tell the difference between the 2 very easily. This is not to say that my ears are better than HD's, it may as well be the opposite. However, I just want to add my 2 cents in so as to allay a new Polkie's fears about the difference between the LSi and RTi.
    Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R
  • *Seby*-Polk-
    *Seby*-Polk- Posts: 375
    edited February 2006
    Bose Lifestyle vs Polk Monitor series...ok.

    I listen Bose and Polk ... BOSE very high prices.....crazy prices...for nothing.

    Polk sounds better ... don't joke. I prefeer Infinity and Klipsch to Bose. Bye.
    My current new system (step by step :D)

    A/V Receiver: YAMAHA RX-V657
    DVD Player: YAMAHA DVD-S657
    Main Towers: polkaudio® Monitor 50
    Wiring: NeoTecH KS1007 OFC High Definition Speaker Cable ( 2 x 2.64 mm² )
  • crazy
    crazy Posts: 443
    edited February 2006
    He is merely posting an opinion based thread. Geez give some of the members a break.

    Crazy - I don't have any experience with all these different speakers, in other words really never got a chance to really sit down and listen to all of them with the same source, music, etc to really compare them. Hopefully someone on this forum can give you a better conclusion to your post.

    Scott

    Thanks for defending me ... I was merely trying to start a thread where we could talk about speakers that can be compared against one another.

    Russ, if you want to participate - you can add your own combos as well, no one's stopping you - there's no need to give smart-**** comments if you have nothing to say. You can always chose not to paricipate.

    I am trying to see what folks say if you compare speakers ... so if you have other speakers you want compare, just add them
    Distant Dream - A New Beginning
    www.distantdream.com
    (Now also available on iTunes)
  • crazy
    crazy Posts: 443
    edited February 2006
    Bose Lifestyle vs Polk Monitor series...ok.

    I listen Bose and Polk ... BOSE very high prices.....crazy prices...for nothing.

    Polk sounds better ... don't joke. I prefeer Infinity and Klipsch to Bose. Bye.

    So are you saying that the Polk Moniors sound better than the Bose Lifestyle even though the Bose costs twice as much?
    Distant Dream - A New Beginning
    www.distantdream.com
    (Now also available on iTunes)
  • Holydoc
    Holydoc Posts: 1,048
    edited February 2006
    Joey_V wrote:
    Contrast to HD's experience with the LSi/RTi, I can tell the difference between the 2 very easily. This is not to say that my ears are better than HD's, it may as well be the opposite. However, I just want to add my 2 cents in so as to allay a new Polkie's fears about the difference between the LSi and RTi.

    Joey,

    I hope I am not misleading anyone into thinking that I am stating that the RTi series is equivalent to the LSi's. That is why I stated the "Points of Interest". I would love to do this same test now that I understand stereo dynamics and have a system that could feed the necessary power to make a fair test. Hmm...now that I think about it, I would NOT love to do this test again. I do not want to get upgraditis so soon after Christmas! :D

    Probably should of removed that comparison from my discussion since I cannot even begin to claim that it was set-up adequately for the LSi's.
    Holydoc (Home Theatre Lover)
    __________________________________________
    Panasonic -50PX600U 50" Plasma
    Onkyo -TX-NR901 Receiver
    Oppo -Oppo 980HD Universal DVD Player
    Outlaw -770 (7x200watt) Amplifier
    PolkAudio - RTi12 (Left and Right)
    PolkAudio - CSi5 (Center)
    PolkAudio - FXi3 (Back and Surround)
    SVS - PB-12/Plus (Subwoofer)
    Bluejean Cables - Interconnects
    Logitech Harmony 880 - Remote
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,986
    edited February 2006
    Smart **** or not, it's my opinion. The thread is stupid.

    The only comparison that is even anywhere NEAR apples to apples is the B&W 600 series, vs Polk RTi. The rest? Different market segments, and vastly different pricepoints. To declare a 'champion' based on these simple comparisons is silly.

    If you don't like what I have to say YOU sir, don't to have to read it.
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2006
    RuSsMaN wrote:
    How stupid.

    You can't have a champion based on personal preference. Get off the board and ask the general populous walking down the street and guess which answer you will get.

    Russ is giving you some tough love. Don't take it personally. He's right, by the way.

    Perhaps if you provide us with your particular musical tastes, listening preferences, associated components, room size, budget, etc., we could offer some speaker suggestions for you to consider. Otherwise, it's a pointless thread.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited February 2006
    not only stupid. but who cares?
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • amulford
    amulford Posts: 5,020
    edited February 2006
    WAY too deep for my feeble mind. Whew, I've gotta go sit down. Hey I AM sitting. I've gotta go lay down...
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited February 2006
    to further make things tougher.... i bet not everyone in here would like the same speaker.. i'm sure Russ would like some speaker much different than what I might like.. price, brand, etc would make no difference.

    For instance.. I like NAD CD players.. does that mean they are the world champion of CD players? Nope. Does Russ or anyone else with experience of a NAD cd player like em? Maybe, maybe not. High price doesn't mean better sounding anything. Speakers or CD players.

    IF you were seriously considering the above mentioned speakers to purchase.. then maybe people would be more willing to help. But to just throw it out there for **** and giggles. it's stupid. What would it accomplish? Nada. -
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,214
    edited February 2006
    Whatever sounds good to you. Asking which is best based on nothing but each model is pointless. Sound is absolutely subjective and you'll get a different answer every time. Sure we can all generalize, but that's pointless as well. There is not such thing as the perfect speaker for the perfect room with the perfect equipment with perfect hearing. For the most part speakers are not quantifiable. They can't be passed on to the "next round" based on repeatable results in every situation. Just because 1 speaker has amazing accurate bass for you doesn't mean it will for the next person.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • *Seby*-Polk-
    *Seby*-Polk- Posts: 375
    edited February 2006
    crazy wrote:
    So are you saying that the Polk Moniors sound better than the Bose Lifestyle even though the Bose costs twice as much?
    For the price...I choose Polk 100 times. The sound quality of Bose is superb...but NO superior to Polk. For that money i bought a pair of Monitor 70 wich sounds great.

    Try yourself
    My current new system (step by step :D)

    A/V Receiver: YAMAHA RX-V657
    DVD Player: YAMAHA DVD-S657
    Main Towers: polkaudio® Monitor 50
    Wiring: NeoTecH KS1007 OFC High Definition Speaker Cable ( 2 x 2.64 mm² )
  • aaharvel
    aaharvel Posts: 4,489
    edited February 2006
    The cubes sound the best. End thread. :rolleyes:
    H/K Signature 2.1+235
    Jungson MagicBoat II
    Revel Performa M-20
    Velodyne cht-10 sub
    Rega P1 Turntable

    "People working at Polk Audio must sit around the office and just laugh their balls off reading many of these comments." -Lush
  • dkg999
    dkg999 Posts: 5,647
    edited February 2006
    If the $49 a pair speakers at Best Buy sound great to your ears, then those are the best speakers in the world. I agree with Russ, price, market segment, etc. don't matter, unless you want to let those influence what you hear. As my day job is to market products, I love it like all hell when I can influence your purchase decision with the fluff. Bose has made a lot of money selling you image, not sound quality. Maybe they are the best ;)
    DKG999
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC