Four (4 ea.) Rti10 or RTi8 ? ? ? ?

hap123
hap123 Posts: 8
edited February 2006 in Speakers
One dealer suggested that i might tyr four (4) floorstand speakers instead of two (2), as part of my 5.1 surround system. The additional two (2) floorstands would replace the wallmounts or rear bookshelfs on a stand. He said that sometimes people do this too in their setup. He also said that the floorstands provide full information range when additional information is sent to those speakers. Is this just amatter of personal flavor ? ? ? Or are there pros and cons with this . . . . as with anything? ? ?

Thanks - Hap
Post edited by hap123 on

Comments

  • StopherJJ1980
    StopherJJ1980 Posts: 267
    edited February 2006
    Not surprised anytime a salesman suggests you go the more expensive route... :)

    Having said that, you may gain some fuller sound from those channels. Usually there isnt much sound coming from those channels anyways. Also, those 5.1 soundtracks are mixed intending to have the sounds coming from above and slightly behind you and you just cant get floorstanders in those positions obviously. Honestly I dont think youre missing much from the few Hz lower floorstanders can go as opposed to something you can wall mount in the area theyre intended. Plus those low freq. sounds are redirected to your sub anyways, which shouldnt be too localizable, so its not like youre missing them anyways.

    I sya go with your standard surrounds.
    -Stopher
    Tempe, AZ

    Setup:
    Polk RTi8 Mains
    Polk CSi5 Center
    Polk FXi3's Surround
    Cerwin Vega HTS10 Subwoofer
    Yamaha HTR-5740 AVR

    Upstairs R50/R15/CS1 5.1 setup w Pioneer AVR
  • PolkThug
    PolkThug Posts: 7,532
    edited February 2006
    If money and space wasn't an issue, I'd have big "full-range" speakers at each channel.
  • Holydoc
    Holydoc Posts: 1,048
    edited February 2006
    I agree with Stopher in the fact that I do not think you will get any benefit from purchasing those expensive speakers for your rears since the rears are not utilized that much. Instead I would put my money into nice surround speakers like the FXi series or even expanding out to 7.1 (if your receiver permits).

    These cheaper and smaller surround speakers allow more flexibility in placement and adjustments for your soundstage such as bipolar/dipolar modes. This will give you a more encompassing effect especially in a 5.1 system.
    Holydoc (Home Theatre Lover)
    __________________________________________
    Panasonic -50PX600U 50" Plasma
    Onkyo -TX-NR901 Receiver
    Oppo -Oppo 980HD Universal DVD Player
    Outlaw -770 (7x200watt) Amplifier
    PolkAudio - RTi12 (Left and Right)
    PolkAudio - CSi5 (Center)
    PolkAudio - FXi3 (Back and Surround)
    SVS - PB-12/Plus (Subwoofer)
    Bluejean Cables - Interconnects
    Logitech Harmony 880 - Remote
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited February 2006
    PolkThug wrote:
    If money and space wasn't an issue, I'd have big "full-range" speakers at each channel.

    Very true, indeed. The salesman is absolutely correct.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."