Killer speakers a Polk owner built

Mazeroth
Mazeroth Posts: 1,585
edited January 2006 in DIY, Mods & Tweaks
This guy built the Dr. Ks, which were designed by my buddy Darren Kuzma, who is the speaker manager at Parts Express. He also built custom subs under them to augment the bass.

Trey, are you there? I think this is your calling :D

http://www.pesupport.com/cgi-bin/config.pl?read=262497
Post edited by Mazeroth on

Comments

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,822
    edited January 2006
    Those are VERY well built. Nice, very nice.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    Those are the baddest damn DIY speakers I've ever seen!!! Very cool powered bass design. I wanna build a pair myself!!! I asked the dude if he could post the plans for them so anyone could have access to them. If not, I asked him to send me a copy.

    I'd like to know how low the bass goes, though.

    Sid, can you design a cabinet to integrate both the MTM and the bass module so it will appear as a single unit? Maybe use a 10" sub instead of a 12" to make it a bit smaller.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,822
    edited January 2006
    Yes... lol

    Would most likely have a very thick panel between the MTM and sub though, just because thats the way Id do it.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,413
    edited January 2006
    how do you know he's a Polk owner?
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,413
    edited January 2006
    Early B. wrote:
    Sid, can you design a cabinet to integrate both the MTM and the bass module so it will appear as a single unit? Maybe use a 10" sub instead of a 12" to make it a bit smaller.

    that's called a powered tower, no?
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,822
    edited January 2006
    hoosier21 wrote:
    how do you know he's a Polk owner?

    His center! ;)
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,413
    edited January 2006
    I see now
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • DAGLJAM6
    DAGLJAM6 Posts: 635
    edited January 2006
    I thought engineers caught all the little details! :rolleyes:
  • george daniel
    george daniel Posts: 12,096
    edited January 2006
    hoosier runs a train? :D:D
    JC approves....he told me so. (F-1 nut)
  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,413
    edited January 2006
    no engineer here, I just mop the floors there :)
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,093
    edited January 2006
    He probably couldn't see it from all the fried chicken grease he's smeared on the monitor.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited January 2006
    I like the subs, angled stance ala the Allison 9s that I have always wanted since the '80s. Cool looking setup.
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    Check link again. Schematics have been posted.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Pablo
    Pablo Posts: 723
    edited January 2006
    Wow, those are sharp looking. (may inspire me to put rip an old pair of speakers apart on put them in new cabinets).
    Denon AVR-3803
    RTi-70 Fronts
    FXi-30 Surrounds
    RTi-38 Back Surrounds
    Csi-40 Center
    PSW350 Sub
    Panasonic PT-56WXF95 HDTVSamsung un60JS8000 SUHD
    Denon DVD-2910
    Xbox, Gamecube, PS2, PS3, PS4, xbox360, Wii, WiiU, n64
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited January 2006
    Those are gorgeous, wish I had the experience and "hands" to build something like that.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    For a brief moment, I thought about building these speakers to replace my HT speakers. But when I priced out the parts for just the MTM sections, the cost came to approx. $600. Knowing me the way I do, I'd probably go ahead and upgrade some of the crossover components for another, say $120. Then the bass modules would cost about $300 each. So the total price would be in the neighborhood of $1,300 with no guarantee that they'll look and sound better than what I already have. Since I only paid about $700 for my speakers (and they sound great!), no need to gamble on a set of DIYers that cost twice as much. In my case, this is one of those instances where it doesn't make sense to DIY. Still a very neat project, though.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Mazeroth
    Mazeroth Posts: 1,585
    edited January 2006
    The parts for the MTMs are only $387. Follow this link and click the add to basket button at the bottom. http://www.partsexpress.com/projectshowcase/dr-k-mtm/list.html It will show a total of $587, but you need to deduct $200 because you won't need the two 1.0 cubic feet enclosures. Also, the crossover components that are included in the $387 will be more than good. We did a capacitor test at the 2004 Parts Express DiY speaker meet. We used non-polarized electrolytic caps, polypropylene caps, high end ones like Audiocap Thetas, Kimber, etc... We did tests between all of them, had someone running the cap switch, and had people listen to speakers with crappy caps, mid-range, and high end. It was almost a three way tie. Most people marked that they couldn't tell the difference.

    Gotta get back to work...
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,822
    edited January 2006
    Eh, I call BS...

    I could take your setup and put it in another room you never heard it in before and I bet your couldnt even say it was your setup if it was behind a sonically transparent screen...

    Get what I mean?

    These ABC tests are so full of crap its not even funny.

    You upgrade your crossovers on a setup you listen to EVERY single day... in the same exact room with the same exact components - if you cant hear a difference, even a small one - something may be wrong...
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    Mazeroth wrote:
    The parts for the MTMs are only $387. Follow this link and click the add to basket button at the bottom. http://www.partsexpress.com/projectshowcase/dr-k-mtm/list.html It will show a total of $587, but you need to deduct $200 because you won't need the two 1.0 cubic feet enclosures. Also, the crossover components that are included in the $387 will be more than good. We did a capacitor test at the 2004 Parts Express DiY speaker meet. We used non-polarized electrolytic caps, polypropylene caps, high end ones like Audiocap Thetas, Kimber, etc... We did tests between all of them, had someone running the cap switch, and had people listen to speakers with crappy caps, mid-range, and high end. It was almost a three way tie. Most people marked that they couldn't tell the difference.

    Well, I'd probably buy the enclosures so I could focus more of my time on building the bass enclosures. Better yet, it might be easier to buy a couple of 10" Titanic sub kits. Even if I build all of the enclosures myself, it is still cost prohibitive for me.

    Now, in terms of the crossover mods, I upgraded the components on my Norhs and there was a significant improvement after a few hours of break-in. Higher quality parts equals better sound. Not sure why some people don't understand that concept.

    I agree with Sid -- I don't give a damn about someone's listening test. The only ears that matter are my own.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,822
    edited January 2006
    Early...

    I could build you two MTM enclosures with bracing out the izzo for no more than 100-150 shipped (depending on what you wanted to use) - built alot better than PE's ever would be.

    Assuming you only want them in MDF...

    I could easilly pull out some made of MDF with birch plywood bracing interlaced like my DTs...

    It would be difficult to do plywood enclosures due to the complications Im having with the school tools with those kind of cuts (45 degrees)...
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Mazeroth
    Mazeroth Posts: 1,585
    edited January 2006
    Eh, I call BS...

    I could take your setup and put it in another room you never heard it in before and I bet your couldnt even say it was your setup if it was behind a sonically transparent screen...

    Get what I mean?

    These ABC tests are so full of crap its not even funny.

    You upgrade your crossovers on a setup you listen to EVERY single day... in the same exact room with the same exact components - if you cant hear a difference, even a small one - something may be wrong...

    LoL! You're talking to probably the only guy on these forums that runs a separate EQ JUST FOR ROOM CORRECTION! I use TrueRTA on my computer, which I take my measurements with a Behringer ECM8000 connected to an M-Audio Mobile Pre, which is a killer professional external soundcard/pre. I run the program, create my room curve, then compensate for that curve with my Behringer DEQ2496. The DEQ2496 allows me to save 60 different curves, so if I'm sitting in the corner of the room at my desk doing work it's EQed for that spot. I even have the EQ set up for listening to music while I cook in the kitchen, which is connected to my main room!

    The point you fail to see is this: The test was set up on a very high end DiY bookshelf speaker (we're talking over $1000 in parts alone for these 2-ways). They had crossovers made for the speakers and each crossover had a different type/brand of cap. Each crossover was set up on an A/B switch so they could have A running, then go to B and you decide which one sounded better. Probably 90% of the attendants there couldn't hear a difference between any of the capacitors. The electrolytic caps cost pennies on the dollar to what the high end caps run.

    I'm not knocking you guys, but I'm honestly trying to save you some money. Crossover topology, NOT crossover part quality, is what's important. Drivers are next, followed by the box and then box dampening (my opinion). In an overall order I'd put the order of importance: Crossover topology, driver selection, room, box, box dampening, crossover parts.

    Anywho, do what you like. I honestly am just trying to help.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    Maz --

    Sid and I are basing our statements on personal experience. If you wanna know whether or not crossover mods make a difference, upgrade the crossover components in your speakers, let them break in, then post your findings here.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • Mazeroth
    Mazeroth Posts: 1,585
    edited January 2006
    The only way to truly know if there is a benefit is to upgrade one of your speakers, let it break in or whatever you want to do to it, then do an A/B test, in your own home, and see if you can tell a difference. Mark which one has the new crossover and have a friend put them in place. Blindfold yourself and do an A/B and see which one you prefer. Most people can't tell the difference. Some like the newer one better. Some prefer the older one. Upgrades don't always result in better sound.
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited January 2006
    Mazeroth wrote:
    The only way to truly know if there is a benefit is to upgrade one of your speakers, let it break in or whatever you want to do to it, then do an A/B test, in your own home, and see if you can tell a difference.

    I'm sure you've made plenty of noticable upgrades on your system without resorting to A/B tests to prove to yourself that the SQ improved.

    This is audio, Maz -- if it sounds better, it is better. It ain't an exact science.
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."