RTi8's, 10's or 12's

drew spelts
drew spelts Posts: 310
edited November 2005 in Speakers
I was originally dead set on having RTi12's up front on HT system but it seems like they might not be the best choice withought the money for a seperate amp for them. I will be running a Harman Kardon AVR-635 in a 15 X 15 foot room. I am starting to think that the 12's would be overkill and still might not sound all that great withought a tight sub. So now I am considering between the 8's and the 10's and just forgetting about the 12's. Do you guys think the 10's will be easier to push than the 12's or not noticable. I dont think the 8's would produce hardly any base at all and might leave it a little hollow for HT up front. I am using RTi6's as rear surrounds in a 5.1 setup. Just want some opinions on wether the 10's are worth the extra $$$$ over the 8's.
Harman Kardon AVR635
RTi10's Up Front
CSi5 Center
RTi6's Rear Surround
Furman RA-1210:rolleyes:
Post edited by drew spelts on

Comments

  • Willow
    Willow Posts: 11,056
    edited November 2005
    Which ever you choose you need a sub. There is no way any of those speakers running off you receiver will compare to a sub with built in amp, you are compromising the sound and may damage your gear.
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited November 2005
    You will need a good sub for HT anyway; once you have a good sub, the 8's will give you all you need.

    Edit: Willow typed faster....:)
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • keith allen
    keith allen Posts: 734
    edited November 2005
    Go with the 8's,and a sub
  • BIZILL
    BIZILL Posts: 5,432
    edited November 2005
    agreed.

    POLK SDA-SRS 1.2TL -- ADCOM GFA-5802
    PANASONIC PT-AE4000U -- DIY WILSONART DW 135" 2.35:1 SCREEN
    ONKYO TX-SR805
    CENTER: CSI5
    MAINS: RTI8'S
    SURROUNDS: RTI8'S
    7.1 SURROUNDS: RTI6'S
    SUB: SVS PB12-PLUS/2 (12.3 series)

    XBOX 360
    WiiPS3/blu-rayTOSHIBA HD-A35 hd dvd

    http://polkarmy.com/forums/index.php
    bobman1235 wrote:
    I have no facts to back that up, but I never let facts get in the way of my arguments.
  • aaharvel
    aaharvel Posts: 4,489
    edited November 2005
    8's and a sub.

    or if you feel that the 8's sound too bright then try out the 10's and a sub. Some here believe that the 8's sound brighter than the 10's and 12's. And yeah the 10's are easier to drive than the 12's.
    H/K Signature 2.1+235
    Jungson MagicBoat II
    Revel Performa M-20
    Velodyne cht-10 sub
    Rega P1 Turntable

    "People working at Polk Audio must sit around the office and just laugh their balls off reading many of these comments." -Lush
  • sickicw
    sickicw Posts: 456
    edited November 2005
    I would go with the 8's, sub, and a seperate amp for the 8's. If you can't afford the 8's and a seperate amp, I would look into another set of 6's with an amp. I used to have 6's as fronts (crossed over at 60Hz) and when i added a Niles SI-2125 (from crutchfield.com), the difference was huge.
    Speakers: LSi9 x 2, LSic, LSiFX x 2, Velodyne HGS-15
    Amps & Power: Rockford Fosgate T8004 x 3, Cascade Audio APS-55 power supplies x 5, and 1 farad capacitor.
    Electronics: Denon 3806, Toshiba HD-A1, & Sony KDL46XBR2
    Accessories: Anti-IC interconnects, 8 Mondo Traps from Realtraps, and Salamander furniture.
  • Ricardo
    Ricardo Posts: 10,636
    edited November 2005
    hmmm...separate amp for the 8's; maybe it is a good idea, but I have mine directly from my Denon 3803 and must say I am not even thinking on upgrading...and believe me...I like to upgrade :)
    _________________________________________________
    ***\\\\\........................... My Audio Journey ............................./////***

    2008 & 2010 Football Pool WINNER
    SOPA
    Thank God for different opinions. Imagine the world if we all wanted the same woman
  • Willow
    Willow Posts: 11,056
    edited November 2005
    I have my 8s running from my yammy and right now I am satified the Word here is RIGHT NOW
  • team_canada
    team_canada Posts: 107
    edited November 2005
    sickicw wrote:
    I would go with the 8's, sub, and a seperate amp for the 8's. If you can't afford the 8's and a seperate amp, I would look into another set of 6's with an amp. I used to have 6's as fronts (crossed over at 60Hz) and when i added a Niles SI-2125 (from crutchfield.com), the difference was huge.

    I also agree with using a separate amp for the fronts, the 8's in this case. My Elite M-10X is not a huge amp (100 watts x 2) but does make a noticeable difference with my RTi70's.

    Let your receiver power your center and surrounds. Less stress on the receiver will equal better performance.

    Just my two cents.
    POLKPIONEER SYSTEM

    Receiver - Pioneer Elite VSX-56TXi
    Amp - Pioneer Elite M-10X
    DVD Player - Pioneer Elite DV-59AVi
    Front Speakers - polkaudio RTi70's
    Center Channel - polkaudio CS400i
    Sub - polkaudio PSW202
    Surround Speakers - polkaudio R15's (7.1 System)
    Speaker Cable - Unity Monster Link Biwire
    (Fronts & Center)

    TOTAL SPEAKER UPGRADE COMING SOON!!