SQ in integrated vs. separates

Early B.
Early B. Posts: 7,900
edited March 2005 in 2 Channel Audio
Always wondered if there was a difference in SQ between separates and an integrated amp at similar price points. For HT, the reasons for getting into separates are pretty clear -- you typically get better SQ. But with 2-channel systems, I'm not sure. For instance, generally speaking, will a $1,200 amp/pre combo sound "better" than a $1,200 integrated amp? If not, then the reasons for buying separates has nothing to do with SQ. Is this correct?
HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

"God grooves with tubes."
Post edited by Early B. on

Comments

  • faster100
    faster100 Posts: 6,124
    edited March 2005
    with all the great HT receivers out there i can't see the reason for separetes in a HT, besides trying to run 4 ohm loads or lsi's if you will, My rti's and denon do great!! as for 2 channel id say the integrated tube units are close to the same as a pre/amp combo but some of the SS integrates i would think have alot more in them to mess with the quality of sound.. ie: swithes, circuit boards, extra's in some units... the tube gear of late seems to be clean and to the point, and in some cases point to point with no boards.... a much cleaner signal path.. However i'll let the "pro's" chime in on this one as all i have had are receivers and pre/amp combo's except for my old kenwood integrated in my bedroom system...

    my 0.02 cents
    MY HT RIG:
    Sherwood p-965
    Sherwood sd871 dvd
    Rotel 1075 amp x5
    LSI15 mains
    LsiC center
    LSIfx surround backs
    Lsi7 side surrounds
    SVS pb12/plus2


    2 Channel Rig:

    nad 1020 Pre-amp
    Rotel 1080 stereo amp
    Polk sda 2B
    kenwood grunt Tuner
    realistic lab 450 TT
    Signal cable IC
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited March 2005
    If you want to listen to Jupiter from Holst's "Planets" played with all the heft and weight a full symphony orchestra can muster, and your speakers are the slightest bit insensitive, a 50wpc integrated amp isn't going to hack it. A 100wpc integrated isn't going to hack it. Hell man, a 150wpc integrated amp probably won't cut it. Get HEFTY!

    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • jdhdiggs
    jdhdiggs Posts: 4,305
    edited March 2005
    I would still go seperates as it keeps more options open: You can find a pre you really like and an amp you really like. Or maybe a combo that works really well together. With an integrated, you have to replace the whole unit to do any experimenting. So unless you know a particular integrated is "your sound" or a final piece, I'd stay with seperates.

    As to which sounds better, as with everything audio, there is some gems and dog turds under both labels at all price brackets. Experiment and find what you like.
    There is no genuine justice in any scheme of feeding and coddling the loafer whose only ponderable energies are devoted wholly to reproduction. Nine-tenths of the rights he bellows for are really privileges and he does nothing to deserve them. We not only acquired a vast population of morons, we have inculcated all morons, old or young, with the doctrine that the decent and industrious people of the country are bound to support them for all time.-Menkin
  • Early B.
    Early B. Posts: 7,900
    edited March 2005
    Do separates create complications -- i.e., more stuff getting in the way or altering the signal such as two different power supplies, extra power cord, extra interconnects, different parts, more parts, etc.?

    Just asking these questions to increase my understanding of the 2-channel world. I have a tube integrated amp, primarily because I was trying to minimize costs at the time. My friend has high quality tube separates (Audio Research) and SQ-wise, I can't really tell the difference between his system and mine. Am I missing something?
    HT/2-channel Rig: Sony 50” LCD TV; Toshiba HD-A2 DVD player; Emotiva LMC-1 pre/pro; Rogue Audio M-120 monoblocks (modded); Placette RVC; Emotiva LPA-1 amp; Bada HD-22 tube CDP (modded); VMPS Tower II SE (fronts); DIY Clearwave Dynamic 4CC (center); Wharfedale Opus Tri-Surrounds (rear); and VMPS 215 sub

    "God grooves with tubes."
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited March 2005
    It truely depends on who designed it, the quality of components and quality of production. I like seperates because I can pick and choose as I wish. Of course then you start adding in very expensive cables and can have unknown mismatches between equipment. I think in general people who design seperates do a better job with each component. There are tradeoffs on price with integrateds. As a manufacturer if you have one power supply which can run the whole thing then you just saved money and can spend it in other areas. Of course many would still charge the same price and pocket the profits. If you pocketed the savings then you are probably going to lack in quality because you have multiple stages pulling from the same supply with no added benifit elsewhere. If you put the savings elsewhere then you may end up with a better sound even though you are still pulling from the same supply.

    Too many factors to draw a conclusion. :)

    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • 2+2
    2+2 Posts: 546
    edited March 2005
    If you want to listen to Jupiter from Holst's "Planets"
    OT
    George,
    That is one of my audio test pieces as well...along with Dvorak Sym 9 and Saint Saens Sym 3....puts all things to the test....:D
    System 1: Martin Logan Vantage, Rotel RC 1070, B&K Reference 200.2, Music Hall DAC 15.2, Yamaha 2300

    System 2: LSi15 w/db840, Marantz SR8400, Rotel 1080, RM6800 (C&S), Sony X2020ES

    System 3: LSi7, Yamaha SW215, Music Hall Maven, Music Hall MMF CD25 w/627opamps

    System 4: RTi100, Harman Kardon AVR 230, Panasonic DVD
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited March 2005
    I like it a lot, and have trouble listening to any other version than The Boston Symphony conducted by Steinberg.

    I've heard versions that sounded like Tinkerbell's theme song or something.

    Don't like Dutoit/Montreal, Ozawa/L.A.,
    Bernstein/N.Y. It has to be The BSO for me.

    Guy (Holst) had a great imagination huh?


    George Grand (of the Jersey Grands)
  • organ
    organ Posts: 4,969
    edited March 2005
    I like seperates more because you can pick which pre and amp you want to use. The combination is endless.

    Yes, it is more components than an integrated and can be more complex but the hardcore seperates fans look at the seperation of low voltage units (pre) and high voltage (amps) as a big plus.

    Maurice
  • LuSh
    LuSh Posts: 887
    edited March 2005
    I've been busy with this question myself. Flat earthers will always point to the pre-amp/amp combos but an influx of newschoolers think high end intergrateds are now the answer. For years intergrateds weren't even an answer because nobody made anything of note. YBA changed all that with the Intregre. Soon other high end company's started to make high quality intergrateds. Krell, Musical Fidelity, SimAudio, Classe', Blue Circle, Plinus, Jeff Rowland, etc etc etc...if absolute current and bi amping is the direction you NEED in order to drive your speakers properly then yes, separates are the only answer.

    The polk audio LSi's are realatively easy to drive, within the realm of the high end. The price shoots way way up for separates once you factor in quality interconnects and possible powercords. I've considered it, and I'm pretty sure my next electronic upgrade with be another Intergrated, by either SimAudio like the i-5 or Classe's 151. If I could afford it I'd take a poke at the Jeff Rowland Concentra intergrated.
    http://www.audiophilia.com/hardware/concentra.htm
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,546
    edited March 2005
    Hey Lush, good to see you back.

    I agree, there are some very nice high end integrated amps available these days that equal and surpass separates. I chose a high tone integrated over high tone separates for my main rig, no regrets at all.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • marker
    marker Posts: 1,084
    edited March 2005
    I have an old Adcom GTP400 tuner/preamp. Would you guys consider that to be seperates?

    I realize a preamp having it's own dedicated power supply is probably better than a shared one, but I thought the main thing was to seperate the nasty tuner from the power amp section, like in integrateds and tuner/preamps like mine.