someone give me a answer
wangotango68
Posts: 1,056
can someone tell me if these speakers were designed for pro-logic
or dolby digital? like it makes a hellava difference. just wanted to know,had someone tell me there were intended for pro-logic.
i guess that makes them not "digital ready" right?
scott:cool:
or dolby digital? like it makes a hellava difference. just wanted to know,had someone tell me there were intended for pro-logic.
i guess that makes them not "digital ready" right?
scott:cool:
Post edited by RyanC_Masimo on
Comments
-
My question is....what does digital ready have to do with a speaker?
Nothing, would be my answer.tell me there were intended for pro-logic.
Peace Out~:DIf...
Ron dislikes a film = go out and buy it.
Ron loves a film = don't even rent. -
they look like matison speakers the kit speakers you put togeter your self, i dont thank that there would be that much diffance between pro lodgic vs dd for a speater if it is a newer modle, long as they can handle highs & the lows that the digital signal puts out, dose the speaker have a frequency graft what is its top& bottem frequency rating. rt-7 mains
rt-20p surounds
cs-400i front center
cs-350 ls rear center
2 energy take 5, efects
2- psw-650 , subs
1- 15" audiosource sub
lets all go to the next ces. -
They are ls/fx, and maybe he meant the were designed for 'surround' or rear use.....
Identical tweet on the rear with the port, di/bipole switch on the side with the terminals. I used a pair for about 6 months with an rt800/cs300 setup, they produced a VERY diffuse soundfield...well worth it.
Cheers,
RussCheck your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service. -
There is of course no such thing as a digital or non-digital loudspeaker. Any speaker, hooked up to either system, will successfully deliver either format.
If they are rear surrounds, and you have a pro-logic system, they will get a matrixed mono stereo-extension signal. If they are rear surrounds and you have a Dolby Digital system, they will get discrete digital channel signals (in 5.1 encoded material).
MC -
the reason i asked is that i thought i had a deal then all of a sudden they said they did not want them cause they were not for dd or dts but were for pro logic. whatever trips there trigger.
scott:cool: -
sorry i didnt see the back side where the other drivers are. rt-7 mains
rt-20p surounds
cs-400i front center
cs-350 ls rear center
2 energy take 5, efects
2- psw-650 , subs
1- 15" audiosource sub
lets all go to the next ces. -
i have use the same speaks for my surrounds had them b4 the dvd and after ther work great in the manual it sez for dpl the dipole setting would be best and for digital bi pole i have mine set to bi pole and they rockSpeakers:
Definitive BP7001sc mains
Definitive C/L/R 3000 center
Polk RT800i's rears
Definitive supercube I Sub
Audio:
Onkyo TX-NR3010
Emotiva XPA five Gen 3
OPPO BDP-103 CD, SACD, DVD-A
Video:
Panasonic TC-P65ZT60
OPPO BDP-103 Bluray
Directv x's 2 -
There is an element of truth to a "Pro-Logic specific" speaker. As you know, the surround speakers in DPL are mono. They are also not full range. To help create a more convincing surround effect, dipole speakers were often used. This doesn't seem to be as critical with DD where you have discrete, full-range channels. It also isn't recommended for surround sound music.
Aaron