One pair of FXi3s or Two???

MonteM
MonteM Posts: 12
edited September 2004 in Speakers
(7.1 configuration)
Should I buy 1 pair of Fxi3s and install them for side surrounds in di-pole mode and install a pair of RTi4s for the back surround? Or should I buy 2 pairs of FXi3s and run the side surrrounds in di-pole mode and run the back surrounds in bi-pole mode? Opinions please. Here is what I will have for the rest of the system...

-Stereo = Denon 2805
-Fronts = RTi4s or RTi6s (haven't decided yet)
-Center = CSi3
-Sub = Audio concepts 12inch sub kit
Post edited by MonteM on

Comments

  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited September 2004
    Bi/dipole on the sides is going to give you a more diffused soundfield, basically no localization. Direct radiating speakers mounted on the sides will be very noticeable, but they'll work great if mounted on the rear wall.

    From the Polk Audio HT Handbook...

    Since it’s impractical for
    homeowners to install multiple pairs of
    “effects channel” loudspeakers, manufacturers
    offer “bi-directional” (bipole or dipole)
    speakers, which place drivers on both the
    front and rear of the cabinet. This arrangement
    spreads the sound along the side-walls,
    making it harder for the audience to identify
    the location of the surround speakers and
    delivering a more enveloping experience.
    This is especially important if your surround
    speakers need to be placed within a few feet
    of your listening position (Fig. 3a & 3b).
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • MonteM
    MonteM Posts: 12
    edited September 2004
    That sounds good. I think I want to go with the FXi3s for the side surround but what the back surround? Should I go with a second pair or go with something like RTi4s?
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited September 2004
    RT4's in the rear will work great.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • EA_Cru_2002
    EA_Cru_2002 Posts: 3
    edited September 2004
    In my opinion, I'd go with the FXi3's in the rears. I have a 5.1 system (due to room constraints) and have the FXi5's behind me in bipole setting, and to me, they sound more diffuse than direct radiating monopoles like the RTi4's so it'll probably fit in better with the diffuse sounding FXi3 dipoles on the side.
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited September 2004
    He's looking to set up a 7.1 not a 5.1 though. FX's on the sides, direct radiating on the rear wall.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited September 2004
    Originally posted by Frank Z
    He's looking to set up a 7.1 not a 5.1 though. FX's on the sides, direct radiating on the rear wall.
    iagree.gif
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited September 2004
    are you going to be sitting right on the back wall ? i hope not
  • MonteM
    MonteM Posts: 12
    edited September 2004
    Unfortunately my seating area will be close to the back wall due to room constraints. My room is fairly long but narrow so my seating distance from the TV is limited.
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited September 2004
    then you might want to use fxi3's if you are going to be close to the back wall, it will diffuse things better
  • MonteM
    MonteM Posts: 12
    edited September 2004
    Since I will be so close to the back of the wall are you suggesting then that I use FXi3s for both the side and back surrounds?
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited September 2004
    No, what's being suggested is that you go with a 5.1 system instead of 7.1. Exactly how far is your rear wall from your seating area.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited September 2004
    if it were ME... i'd go with all FXi3's for rear and side walls. I really enjoy the diffused sound from bi pole speakers.

    bi/di pole speakers give you two tweeters and a mid/bass driver. I'd think that more drivers would sound better. Just a thought.. but that's what I would do if it were ME.

    If you're to close to the rear wall.. the RTi4's may go overhead and you would lose some of the rear effects. that won't happen with the FXi3's... the drivers are facings two directions.
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • MonteM
    MonteM Posts: 12
    edited September 2004
    Originally posted by Frank Z
    No, what's being suggested is that you go with a 5.1 system instead of 7.1. Exactly how far is your rear wall from your seating area.

    My couch will only be a few feet at most away from the back wall.
  • Airplay355
    Airplay355 Posts: 4,298
    edited September 2004
    id go with all fxi3's, i also like the difused sound much better then the direct speakers
  • Frank Z
    Frank Z Posts: 5,860
    edited September 2004
    My back row is 2' away and I'm using 7's. If possible try both and see what you think.
    9/11 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET!! (<---<<click)
    2005-06 Club Polk Football Pool Champion!! :D