Opinions on these amps..Adcom, Shure, SAE

hoopdaaron
hoopdaaron Posts: 16
edited August 2004 in Electronics
Any opinion son these amps, I have a chance to by any of these to run my RTi12's.

Adcom 5500 $400
SAE 2401 $450
Shure HT5300 $225 each or $450 for both.

obviously I am familiar with the Adcom and that is the way I am leaning, but has anyone else heard of SAE and Shure?

hda
Home Theater System

Front - Polk Rti12
Side surround - Polk FXi5
Rear Surround - Polk FXi5
Center - Polk CSi5
Subwoofer - Velodyne CHT-15
Receiver - Onkyo 901
TV - Sony 60" LCD
DVD - Sony 725
Game - PS2 (Optical audio, and Component video)
Power - Monster Cable HTS1000
Interconnects, Audio - Monster Optical 200, or Monster 400MKii
Interconnects, Video - Monster Video 3 Component
Speaker cables - Monster Z3 for front, center - 12 gauge in wall for all rear
Post edited by hoopdaaron on

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,761
    edited August 2004
    Here is what the Orion Bluebook has to say about the amps.


    ADCOM
    PWR, GFA-5500
    Description: 2-CHANNEL, MOSFET OUTPUT, LOW NEGATIVE FEEDBACK
    Manufacture Years: 1997 - Current
    Additional Information:
    Power: 200
    Retail
    MSRP: $1,200.00
    USED: $550.00



    SAE(Scientific Audio Electronics)
    PWR, 2401
    Description:
    Manufacture Years: 1976 - 1982
    Additional Information:
    Power: 200
    Retail
    MSRP: $1,000.00
    USED: $350.00



    SHURE
    SGNPRO, HTS-5300 SURROUND SOUND w/REMOTE
    Description: ACRA VECTOR LOGIC STEERING, ENHANCE MODES, DIGITAL DELAY
    Manufacture Years: 1988 - 1992
    Additional Information:
    Retail
    MSRP: $1,000.00
    USED: $120.00


    Looks to me like the Shure isn't even a amp, but a pre/pro. Based on price alone, Adcom wins out.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • hamzahsh
    hamzahsh Posts: 439
    edited August 2004
    If I were you and I have RTi12's I would buy 2 NAD C272 2-channel AMPs and bridge each of them to monoblock which gives 300w single channel driven. Remember RTi12s need upto 500w of continuous power. The more you give the better the they perform.

    :D
    Panasonic TH-50PX80U Plasma HDTV
    Polk Audio RT800i (fronts)
    Polk Audio CS400i (center)
    Polk Audio F/X1000 (side surrounds)
    Polk Audio RTi6 (back surrrounds)
    Velodyne CHT-15 (subwoofer)
    Yamaha RX-V1400 (Pre/Pro)
    NAD C272 (2-ch Amp)
    Adcom GFA-7605 (5-ch Amp)
    Toshiba SD-3109 (DVD/CD player)
    Malata DVP-580 (Multi-region DVD player)
  • hoopdaaron
    hoopdaaron Posts: 16
    edited August 2004
    The deal on the Adcom may be too good to pass up considering he will take $400 and it is $400 worth of stuff I am going to trade him. (Misc car audio product gathering dust in the attic)

    I might go for the adcom, and then eventually keep my eyes out for another adcom, and bridge them to each speaker in the future.

    I have an Okyo 901 receiver, would you let the Adcom do the whole load, or biamp the RTI12's?

    hda
    Home Theater System

    Front - Polk Rti12
    Side surround - Polk FXi5
    Rear Surround - Polk FXi5
    Center - Polk CSi5
    Subwoofer - Velodyne CHT-15
    Receiver - Onkyo 901
    TV - Sony 60" LCD
    DVD - Sony 725
    Game - PS2 (Optical audio, and Component video)
    Power - Monster Cable HTS1000
    Interconnects, Audio - Monster Optical 200, or Monster 400MKii
    Interconnects, Video - Monster Video 3 Component
    Speaker cables - Monster Z3 for front, center - 12 gauge in wall for all rear
  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,728
    edited August 2004
    The lows are what suck so much of the power in those 12s...

    I'd bi-amp for two reasons:

    1 - Different amps have different sound characteristics, and you generally want the same sound at least across the front stage (mains and center). You may notic tonal differences when powering the 12s with the Adcom and the center with the Oink...

    2 - Since the lows suck so much juice, you'd really want an amp of that power dedicated only to them. The mids and highs don't need taht much power, and your receiver should be able to handle them fine, so I'd let it do it's job.

    So, I'd bi-amp the 12s with the receiver on the top post, amp on the bottom...

    Note: The above is based on the assumption that you are using this for HT. If this is primarily a 2 channel rig, at least one of the points above is moot.