Which of the following amps for a pair of RT55s?
bigsexy1
Posts: 557
I scored a pair of RT55s (not the RT55i). Right now the plan is to have them in a dedicated 2 channel only set up for casual listening, maybe even for an office system (although that would be overkill)!. I also have a Polk 303 sub I could team up w/ them too.
I have the following amps I could team up with them:
Adcom GFA535 (60 watts per)
Adcom GFA5400 (125 watts per)
HK PA2000 (100 watts per in bridged mode)
Onkyo 8511 receiver (100 watts per)
NAD C270 (120 watts per)
I don't particularly like the way Onkyo and Polk mix. The older generation Adcom amp (the 535) I think is much brighter and grainer than the newer Adcom 5400, and even though I know it would probably be the best match out of them all I'd rather use the NAD 270 on something else. So it pretty much comes down to the Adcom 5400 vs. the HK 2000. Right now, I'm leaning towards the HK amp as I feel the Adcom is a little brighter than the HK.
Which would you guys use out of that list for a set of RT55s?
Thanks in advance for any replys.
I have the following amps I could team up with them:
Adcom GFA535 (60 watts per)
Adcom GFA5400 (125 watts per)
HK PA2000 (100 watts per in bridged mode)
Onkyo 8511 receiver (100 watts per)
NAD C270 (120 watts per)
I don't particularly like the way Onkyo and Polk mix. The older generation Adcom amp (the 535) I think is much brighter and grainer than the newer Adcom 5400, and even though I know it would probably be the best match out of them all I'd rather use the NAD 270 on something else. So it pretty much comes down to the Adcom 5400 vs. the HK 2000. Right now, I'm leaning towards the HK amp as I feel the Adcom is a little brighter than the HK.
Which would you guys use out of that list for a set of RT55s?
Thanks in advance for any replys.
Post edited by bigsexy1 on
Comments
-
-
I have the NAD C270 and RT55is. I do not have them hooked up all the time but I have used them together on a few occasions and they sound very nice together."Just because youre offended doesnt mean youre right." - Ricky Gervais
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson -
I'll vote for the NAD as well. The NAD's smoothness should match well with the Tri-lam.
WesLink: http://polkarmy.com/forums
Sony 75" Bravia 4K | Polk Audio SDA-SRS's (w/RDO's & Vampire Posts) + SVS PC+ 25-31 | AudioQuest Granite (mids) + BWA Silver (highs) | Cary Audio CAD-200 | Signal Cable Silver Resolution XLR's | Rotel Michi P5 | Signal Cable Silver Resolution XLR's | Cambridge Audio azur 840C--Wadia 170i + iPod jammed w/ lossless audio--Oppo 970 | Pure|AV PF31d -
Nad, and that should sound pretty rockin'.
Two Channel Setup:
Speakers: Wharfedale Opus 2-3
Integrated Amp: Krell S-300i
DAC: Arcam irDac
Source: iMac
Remote Control: iPad Mini
3.2 Home Theater Setup:
Fronts: Klipsch RP-160M
Center: Klipsch RP-160M
Subwoofer: SVS PB12NSD (X 2)
AVR: Yamaha Aventage RX-A2030
Blu Ray: Sony BDP-S790
TV Source: DirecTV Genie -
NAD, with the HK a very close second.