SVS SoundPath Subwoofer Adapter

Toolfan66
Toolfan66 Posts: 17,300
edited November 2 in 2 Channel Audio
SVS SoundPath Speaker Level Subwoofer Adapter.

So I received my SB16 Subs a couple weeks ago, I had contacted Cary to see if it was safe to plug the subs into the open RCA jacks since I’m using XLR’s to the amps, I was told there would be no issues.
Well there were no issues using them mechanically, but on a lot of material I could hear the timing was off, I was loving the extra bass, but I knew something wasn’t right.
I had been talking to Trey behind the scenes, and he suggested using this adapter.
Well I received it this week, and what a night and day difference, I realized that not only was the timing off, but it was actually messing with the imaging , slightly blurring it.
This adapter was everything I needed, but really they should just put the option back on their subwoofers..
I’m happy nonetheless..

Here is a few pics, I made a mounting bracket for it to mount on the back of my rack..

Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

SVS SB16 X2

Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
Post edited by Toolfan66 on

Comments

  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,300
    8x30d9822aqb.jpegqt4q4iygqgea.jpeg
    atphfubeshcw.jpeg
    mri4l9xw42or.jpeg
    x5japd0s7ar4.jpeg
    hgzo31qdsubw.jpeg
    jzyw6jp5c4i4.jpeg
    xa9s76c6y4dd.jpeg

    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,300
    79ti1k748smx.jpeg
    cnba7drw15tn.jpeg
    yxuq22o2mrc1.jpeg
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,300
    9xdxuseu5pmd.jpeg
    9173ze4hyuzc.jpeg
    h8q1nw6zcm7x.jpeg
    462d93g1h9e6.jpeg
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    Glad it all worked out!

    Looks like good quality resistors inside too!
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    edited November 3
    I've been saying for years that speaker level is best. I even told SVS that. They told me it makes no difference...ha, you bet your a$$ it does.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    Rca parallel out truly does something to the sound, speaker level is the way
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,300
    I played some vinyl this morning, and everything is tight and full, I’m loving the addition of subwoofers in the mix of my two channel system, I actually wish I had done it sooner, the wife also agrees 😎
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • Joey_V
    Joey_V Posts: 8,569
    Interesting.
    Magico M2, JL113v2x2, EMM, ARC Ref 10 Line, ARC Ref 10 Phono, VPIx2, Lyra Etna, Airtight Opus1, Boulder, AQ Wel&Wild, SRA Scuttle Rack, BlueSound+LPS, Thorens 124DD+124SPU, Sennheiser, Metaxas R2R
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,138
    Here is the skinny....

    There are folks who are correct in their assessment here. No doubt. But.... (and yes, there is a but)

    It depends. Hear me out....

    If you have a pre-amplifier with a certain topology? ABSOLUTELY, it will reduce your volume by half (and possibly add more noise).

    Other Pre-amplifiers that have differing topologies? Well, they may or may not degrade the sound.

    That said, certain components have, what they call, "line through". This means that the signal is not degraded and that the pure signal is passed through uncompromised.

    That said, I do NOT care to debate this. I am just throwing it out there. Folks have heard my system and they have heard what I am talking about. I have heard the degradation before. I have heard the halving of the signal. Been there, done that. There is more out there....That's all I am saying. FWIW.

    Tom
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    Halving of the signal by using line level? Never heard of that one.

    The difference between using line level and speaker level is the timing.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    edited November 19
    A line thru is simply a parallel connection. There is no circuit or anything special to it.

    4lse7dbyv0fg.jpg

    Kw750 thru put, would be no different than a second set of pre outs in a preamp
    pgroww4tbktm.jpg
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,138
    What I am saying is that while I have heard degradation through some of the (not all of the) pre-amplifiers that have come and gone, there is no degradation when using the line outs on the KW -750.

    It sounds the same, whether you use it or not.

    If the pre has two outputs (line level), I thought that sometimes it halves the signal. I could very well be incorrect on that one. On certain press, when you use both, it screws up the sound.

    I don't detect any timing issues using line out, at least the way I have it configured.

    Tom
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    Ultimately what I am saying is that the thru puts on the amplifier and the second set of main outs on the preamp are one in the same. There is no difference if you were to draw them out on paper, they just reside in different components.

    Like all things, it boils down to the system what works and doesn't.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • WagnerRC
    WagnerRC Posts: 2,158
    Thanks for the info. Just ordered one. much appreciated for the info.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    VR3 wrote: »
    Ultimately what I am saying is that the thru puts on the amplifier and the second set of main outs on the preamp are one in the same. There is no difference if you were to draw them out on paper, they just reside in different components.

    Like all things, it boils down to the system what works and doesn't.

    They are the same coming out of the pre amp, but the signal then passes through the amplifier and therefore the timing/sonic signature are different.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    Here's one person's explanation.
    The speaker (load) determines the phase of the signal out of the amp and therefore going to the sub.
    The sub filter-amp alters phase very little.
    Hence, speaker and sub in phase, always.
    The sub tracks the speakers.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    edited November 19
    It's the same.

    The rca preamp outs and the rca outputs on the musical fidelity amplifiers are wired exactly the same way. Parallel to the primary outputs.

    I am not referencing the svs device from the op
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    edited November 19
    I'll agree to disagree.
    Post edited by F1nut on
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    edited November 19
    Please see attached drawing and please explain how using any of these connections differs from the other as I simply dont understand how there could possibly be a different outcome.

    Thank you13ws63eif213.jpg


    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    edited November 19
    See post 4 up for example.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    Dan has a lot of experience with the subject matter.
    I can clear the dust here which is easy to do IF you actually have experience setting up subwoofer in different rooms.
    As you mentioned a subwoofer is an integration into ones living space. It pressurizes the space to recreate bass. The issue usually one doesn't have the proper amount of space to complete lower frequencies. So what you end up with is delayed signals which slap you after they bounce around in the room or intill completion of the wave.

    So with all that being said if your running a 2 channel system you should strongly consider High level inputs which is speaker level. Line level will also work but your missing something most on the internet without true experience do. It's the interaction with the way the given amp your using reacts to your speakers. By placing the subwoofer in line your now taking sonic ques from the amp not just the source line level signal. The amp has it's own ability to be dynamic and recreating those peaks can be very different with a line level signal going to the amp and to the subwoofer. But with using speaker level the internal amp of the subwoofer tracks the dynamics of the amp and better blends with the main channel speakers. This is why many will claim hearing a sonic difference for the better using high level over using line level out of the preamp.
    Without experiencing this yourself, this is all nonsense I'm babbling to the untrained.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,741
    edited November 19
    Still doesnt make sense so we will have to agree to disagree. :-D

    Just to hammer this further because I am a glutten for punishment.

    If I were to hook up a set of speakers and then rca cables between the preamp and the amplifier, are you stating I will be able to pull different measurements from each the preamp rca jacks and the amplifier rca jacks? That these daisy chained connections are acting independently of each other? (over a standard 1 meter cable).
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    I have no idea.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,647
    Ok, so I see the kW750 has an loop output, which means the pre amp signal is not going through the amp and therefore the sub would be getting it's signal/timing/sonic signature from the pre amp.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk