Extended Definition???

jeffmccathern98
jeffmccathern98 Posts: 3
in Speakers
Can someone explain to me why sony is pushing "extended definition" speakers for sacds? I don't understand why you'd need a speaker to hit 70 khtz when the human ear doesn't hear anything above 25.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Clipdat
    Clipdat Posts: 12,933
    You got a link to these so called "extended definition" speakers?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,494
    Sony doesn't offer those any longer and when they did it was marketing hype along with some attempt at justifying Sony's harsh/bright sound signature.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."

    President of Club Polk

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,004
    You don't need it. Period.

    Tom
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,610
    The idea is the break up point of the tweeter is well beyond human hearing is my understanding
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Emlyn
    Emlyn Posts: 4,476
    The practical frequency response potential of SACD technology was/is around 100kHz. Most SACD players these days still have a top end frequency response for SACD playback at 50 to 60 kHz.

    Sony produced speakers with an extended frequency range potential for a while because they could and because they wanted to sell SACDs. The technology to go to an extended range with a tweeter had been around for a long long time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter