RTi70 > RTi100?

AintJoM0mma
AintJoM0mma Posts: 131
edited June 2004 in Flea Market
Why does the RTi100 cost more than the 70 but it only has 1 driver?
I = NOOOOOOoooooo000b

Post edited by AintJoM0mma on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • scottvamp
    scottvamp Posts: 3,277
    edited June 2004
    Because thier is another AMPLIFIED subwoofer inside the cabinet.
    I have the original rt1000p's and they still rock......
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AintJoM0mma
    AintJoM0mma Posts: 131
    edited June 2004
    I dont get it.
    I = NOOOOOOoooooo000b

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,936
    edited June 2004
    There is an internal 6.5" subwoofer driver in each tower -- with an amp to power it.

    So basically, you get a 6.5" midbass, 1 inch tweeter, and a 6.5" subwoofer - amplified.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AintJoM0mma
    AintJoM0mma Posts: 131
    edited June 2004
    But for highs and mids the 70's sound better yah?
    I = NOOOOOOoooooo000b

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • silverghost
    silverghost Posts: 77
    edited June 2004
    Why is this thread in the Flea Market?
    Yamaha HTR-5640Polk RTi70 Mains Polk CSi30 CenterDayton Titanic MKIII Sub
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AintJoM0mma
    AintJoM0mma Posts: 131
    edited June 2004
    I posted it in the wrong place.........:D
    I = NOOOOOOoooooo000b

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • silverghost
    silverghost Posts: 77
    edited June 2004
    Originally posted by AintJoM0mma
    I posted it in the wrong place.........:D

    Not to worry, man . . . I got ten thumbs, too!
    Yamaha HTR-5640Polk RTi70 Mains Polk CSi30 CenterDayton Titanic MKIII Sub
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,936
    edited June 2004
    Depends on what you like.

    Some people like the two mids on the RTi70, and others like the RTi100 sound.

    Me personally, RTi70 all day... (between the two)
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fireshoes
    fireshoes Posts: 3,167
    edited June 2004
    Originally posted by AintJoM0mma
    But for highs and mids the 70's sound better yah?

    Yah, they do.

    Are you from Canadia? ;)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • scottvamp
    scottvamp Posts: 3,277
    edited June 2004
    You still get the same highs and mids but they add alot more low end........
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,936
    edited June 2004
    I dont agree with the mids deal - just me though.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • brettw22
    brettw22 Posts: 7,623
    edited June 2004
    Originally posted by fireshoes
    Are you from Canadia? ;)
    That's not a Canadian thing......Think Charlies Angeles.......
    comment comment comment comment. bitchy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toxis
    Toxis Posts: 5,116
    edited June 2004
    Originally posted by scottvamp
    You still get the same highs and mids but they add alot more low end........
    I completely agree. The 100's have a lower end kick. A lot fuller, especially if you're not going to have a seperate powered sub.
    Never kick a fresh **** on a hot day.

    Home Setup: Sony VPL-VW85 Projo, 92" Stewart Firehawk, Pioneer Elite SC-65, PS3, RTi12 fronts, CSi5, FXi6 rears, RTi6 surround backs, RTi4 height, MFW-15 Subwoofer.

    Car Setup: OEM Radio, RF 360.2v2, Polk SR6500 quad amped off 4 Xtant 1.1 100w mono amps, Xtant 6.1 to run an eD 13av.2, all Stinger wiring and Raammat deadener.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter