Inductor DCR Question

I see several posts where folks go with "upgrade" inductors with lower DCR than the original. I am wondering why you wouldn't try to say with an inductor with similar DCR as the original? Otherwise, it seems to me that the characteristic of the XO could be quite different. What am I missing?

Apparently, resistances are fairly important in voicing. I was even told by one of the former Polk design engineers (ZSP) that I should stay with the same gauge internal wires as the XO was tuned with that gauge and length wire. Changing the resistance of the wire could slightly de-tune the XO. Notice that he provided a harness diagrams with length and gauge for the RTA-15TL.
Stan

Main 2ch:
Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Benchmark DAC1, Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i; Technics SL-J2, Parasound PPH-100.

HT:
Marantz SR7010, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW110 , Marantz UD5005, Pioneer PL-530, Panasonic TC-P42S60

Other stuff:
Denon: DRA-835R, AVR-888, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, 5B, TSi100, RM7, PSW10 (DXi104 upgrade); Pioneer: CT-6R; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, CDR-615; Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii, Sony CDP-650ESD, Technics SA 5070, B&W DM601

Comments

  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,732
    Best bet is to keep the DCR the same as intended for solid results.
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,553
    edited February 25
    The only inductor I'm aware of using a lower dcr is the SDA inductor. Other than that most, read (I) have stayed as close as possible with both wire gauge and dcr.
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,294
    VR3 wrote: »
    Best bet is to keep the DCR the same as intended for solid results.

    We are doing that except with the 16mh Inductor, we are going to a lower DCR, and I think that is what he is questioning seeing in the post's..
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,294
    edited February 25
    Here, this should answer your question, Darqueknight went through this many years ago, and covered a lot, unfortunately many of his pictures are gone from 2010.

    A good read nonetheless..

    https://forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/109611/improvements-to-modified-sda-srs-1-2tl-crossover/p1

    The use of a high DCR SDA inductor was a design compromise to ensure compatibility with the amplifiers commonly available 20 years ago. Replacement of this inductor with one with a low DCR is a Polk recommended modification, provided your amplifier(s) can deal with the lowered impedance.



    .
    Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎

    SVS SB16 X2

    Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
    Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
    Cary DMS 800PV Network
    OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
    VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
    Jolida JD9 Fully Modified

    VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM

    MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s
  • skrol
    skrol Posts: 3,387
    Ok, that makes sense then.
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Benchmark DAC1, Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i; Technics SL-J2, Parasound PPH-100.

    HT:
    Marantz SR7010, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW110 , Marantz UD5005, Pioneer PL-530, Panasonic TC-P42S60

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-835R, AVR-888, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, 5B, TSi100, RM7, PSW10 (DXi104 upgrade); Pioneer: CT-6R; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, CDR-615; Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii, Sony CDP-650ESD, Technics SA 5070, B&W DM601