Closest alternative to 15" Passive
ZaPHoN
Posts: 90
I suspect this would be a crap shoot but thought I'd throw it out there for speculation anyway.
What passive radiator would come the closest to the 1.2TL passive if someone was forced to use an alternative in the event that someone tripped and put their hand through one rendering it ruined.
What passive radiator would come the closest to the 1.2TL passive if someone was forced to use an alternative in the event that someone tripped and put their hand through one rendering it ruined.
Home Theater & Listening
RECEIVER Yamaha HTR6180
FRONT AMP McIntosh MC2125
THEATER AMP EMOTIVA XPA 7
FRONT Polk SDA 1B
CENTER Polk CsiA4
SURROUND LR KEF Cresta 30
REAR Polk Monitor 5
SUB Tannoy TS 10 Subwoofer
NAS 20 TB Raid 3 QNAP
Office
AMP Luxman L210
SPEAKERS Tannoy
RECEIVER Yamaha HTR6180
FRONT AMP McIntosh MC2125
THEATER AMP EMOTIVA XPA 7
FRONT Polk SDA 1B
CENTER Polk CsiA4
SURROUND LR KEF Cresta 30
REAR Polk Monitor 5
SUB Tannoy TS 10 Subwoofer
NAS 20 TB Raid 3 QNAP
Office
AMP Luxman L210
SPEAKERS Tannoy
Post edited by [Deleted User] on
Comments
-
1.2, SRS, SRS2 (blade/blade). All are SW150.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
Nooooooooo!!!!!!!! (in slo-mo of course)
Not sure if had is supposed to be head or hand, but either way.... -
Hand. I corrected it. Nobody have any candidates for a close simulation?Home Theater & Listening
RECEIVER Yamaha HTR6180
FRONT AMP McIntosh MC2125
THEATER AMP EMOTIVA XPA 7
FRONT Polk SDA 1B
CENTER Polk CsiA4
SURROUND LR KEF Cresta 30
REAR Polk Monitor 5
SUB Tannoy TS 10 Subwoofer
NAS 20 TB Raid 3 QNAP
Office
AMP Luxman L210
SPEAKERS Tannoy -
If you knew the mass and FS, it'd be easy
-
well, the basic notion, as I understand it, is that the (moving?) mass of the PR is supposed to be the same as the mass of air occupying the volume of the port in a "normal" bass reflex cabinet (Helmholz resonator).
So, yeah, as long as the tuning characteristics are known for the enclosure, the proper mass should be 'straightforward' (as a mathematician might put it) to calculate.
In my (very!) limited experience with PRs, the storebought PRs usually have a threaded rod, to which mass (e.g., in the form of nuts and/or washers) may be added to determine and to achieve, semi-empirically, the correct mass for the PR.
This being said, does the compliance of the PR suspension also "enter into the equation", so to speak (perhaps literally)?
I dunno.
