Can anybody tell me what model this is, and specs?

Came with the house. Driving it with a 30 yr old Yamaha R8 (85watt per), love them but am considering driving with a 55 watt sonas amp. Will it be too wimpy..5dczgrotcx4d.jpeg
Thanks in advance

Best Answers

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,546
    Answer ✓
    Those are the original RTA 12 with the Peerless tweeter. They need to be on stands to get the tweeter at ear level.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • FestYboy
    FestYboy Posts: 3,861
    Answer ✓
    They need more power, Scotty!!!
  • Nightfall
    Nightfall Posts: 10,086
    Answer ✓
    Are you talking about the Sonos Connect that weighs in at 5 pounds? I would not use that, the Yamaha undoubtedly has a more robust power supply.
    afterburnt wrote: »
    They didn't speak a word of English, they were from South Carolina.

    Village Idiot of Club Polk
  • Tony M
    Tony M Posts: 11,151
    Answer ✓
    Stick with the Yamaha R8. That receiver looks beefy and capable. If it gets hot, you need to get more power.
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
  • gyrojack
    gyrojack Posts: 3
    Answer ✓
    thanks all, for your input. Very valid point re weight of power supplies, makes sense for old tech electronics, but I'm not too familiar with the new designs. Thanks for the spec, speakers might be quite efficient with a lower power amp. Damn, still a crap shoot. cheers

Answers

  • Tony M
    Tony M Posts: 11,151
    edited February 2018
    Yup, Dilithium Crystals are needed. ;)

    Seriously now, those are supposed to be great stereo speakers from what I've read..
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
  • So based on the speaker system design, is the general thinking these units need a fair amount of power to drive them to reasonably high volume levels?

    My Yamaha unit at 80 watts is plenty for my needs, so my dilemma to wifi enable this room is either use the 30 year old unit rated conservatively at 80, add a wifi unit to it (and hope it hangs in there for a few more years) or go to a new 55 watt wifi amplifier unit set up for this purpose.
  • verb
    verb Posts: 10,176
    gyrojack wrote: »
    Came with the house. Driving it with a 30 yr old Yamaha R8 (85watt per), love them but am considering driving with a 55 watt sonas amp. Will it be too wimpy..5dczgrotcx4d.jpeg
    Thanks in advance

    Nice bonus! Cabinets look minty!
    Basement: Polk SDA SRS 1.2tl's, Cary SLP-05 Pre with ultimate upgrade,McIntosh MCD301 CD/SACD player, Northstar Designs Excelsio DAC, Cambridge 851N streamer, McIntosh MC300 Amp, Silnote Morpheus Ref2, Series2 Digital Cables, Silnote Morpheus Ref2 Series2 XLR's, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Pangea Power Cables, MIT Shotgun S3 IC's, MIT Shotgun S1 Bi-Wire speaker cables
    Office: PC, EAR Acute CD Player, EAR 834L Pre, Northstar Designs Intenso DAC, Antique Sound Labs AV8 Monoblocks, Denon UDR-F10 Cassette, Acoustic Technologies Classic FR Speakers, SVS SB12 Plus sub, MIT AVt2 speaker cables, IFI Purifier2, AQ Cinnamon USB cable, Groneberg Quatro Reference IC's
    Spare Room: Dayens Ampino Integrated Amp, Tjoeb 99 tube CD player (modified Marantz CD-38), Analysis Plus Oval 9's, Zu Jumpers, AudioEngine B1 Streamer, Klipsch RB-61 v2, SVS PB1000 sub, Blue Jeans RCA IC's, Shunyata Hydra 8 Power Conditioner
    Living Room: Peachtree Nova Integrated, Cambridge CXN v2 Streamer, Rotel RCD-1072 CD player, Furman 15PFi Power Conditioner, Polk RT265 In Wall Speakers, Polk DSW Pro 660wi sub
    Garage #1: Cambridge Audio 640A Integrated Amp, Project Box-E BT Streamer, Polk Tsi200 Bookies, Douglas Speaker Cables, Shunyata Power Conditioner
    Garage #2: Cambridge Audio EVO150 Integrated Amplifier, Polk L200's, Analysis Plus Silver Oval 2 Speaker Cables, IC's TBD.
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,801
    edited February 2018
    u97igdrs5ssv.png

    The ad above (from April 1979 Audio magazine) shows the stands that I remember for them.

    FWIW, I didn't much care for them when they were on the market (i.e., compared to the 5, 7 and 10). Too much of something, relative to my taste. (again, strictly my opinion, and strictly FWIW).

    They look(ed) cool, though, no doubt.
  • Tony M
    Tony M Posts: 11,151
    Look at that efficiency level in the ad! 96dbs. :oB)

    That Yamaha is definitely capable and maybe even that amp you're looking at getting will be too. 96 dbs. is Klipsch territory.
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
  • aprazer402
    aprazer402 Posts: 3,147
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    u97igdrs5ssv.png

    The ad above (from April 1979 Audio magazine) shows the stands that I remember for them.

    FWIW, I didn't much care for them when they were on the market (i.e., compared to the 5, 7 and 10). Too much of something, relative to my taste. (again, strictly my opinion, and strictly FWIW).

    They look(ed) cool, though, no doubt.

    But you still have your Polk LF 14's, sort of the same config., sans tweeters? :)
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,801
    aprazer402 wrote: »
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    u97igdrs5ssv.png

    The ad above (from April 1979 Audio magazine) shows the stands that I remember for them.

    FWIW, I didn't much care for them when they were on the market (i.e., compared to the 5, 7 and 10). Too much of something, relative to my taste. (again, strictly my opinion, and strictly FWIW).

    They look(ed) cool, though, no doubt.

    But you still have your Polk LF 14's, sort of the same config., sans tweeters? :)

    Nope, I don't -- hadn't used it for many years (sat in the basement for a couple of decades at least) and arranged to donate it to Polk (some years back) via Dorokusai. Long gone.
  • aprazer402
    aprazer402 Posts: 3,147
    Cool, Thanks for setting me straight. :)
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,801
    I took lotsa photos of it before taking it to MD.
    Like the OP's RTA12, the foam on the PR was delaminating. No audible impact, though (at least at the point in time I sent them on their way).

    10729919005_c06dcb86a5_z.jpgDSC_1150 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,546
    gyrojack wrote: »
    So based on the speaker system design, is the general thinking these units need a fair amount of power to drive them to reasonably high volume levels?

    My Yamaha unit at 80 watts is plenty for my needs, so my dilemma to wifi enable this room is either use the 30 year old unit rated conservatively at 80, add a wifi unit to it (and hope it hangs in there for a few more years) or go to a new 55 watt wifi amplifier unit set up for this purpose.

    It's not about watts, it's about current/amperes.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk