Speaker jumpers and hook up choices Question

geppy1
geppy1 Posts: 3,075
For many years now speakers come with 4 terminals for bi amp/bi wiring. research has shown few people do either but it continues. Whe I has in the audio biz it was one set regarless of the speaker and life was good. With 4 terminals it can be an endless choice of jumpers and hook up methods and they all make the speaker sound different. In my case I would use one of three hook ups regardless of jumpers used

1) Cables to the low side . Jumpers feed the high side This make the most sense to me
2) Cable to the high side Jumpers feedn the low side. Not sure why one would do this.
3)Pos cable to the low side and neg to the high side. This one sounds way different then the other two and in most cases better WHAT IS IT DOING?? What is happening when you use this hook up?

Thanks

Comments

  • afterburnt
    afterburnt Posts: 7,892
    You are using POS cables?
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    What does that mean? They are Analysis Plus oval 9
  • afterburnt
    afterburnt Posts: 7,892
    Don't pay attention to afterburt he is just oone of the local screwballs
  • afterburnt
    afterburnt Posts: 7,892
    Ok geppy I can give you a WAG being that the load on your last configuration is asymmetrical due to the resitance across the jumpers the signal to the woofer is no longer propotional so it sounds lousy. How was that?
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,656
    afterburnt wrote: »
    You are using POS cables?
    geppy1 wrote: »
    What does that mean? They are Analysis Plus oval 9

    he is messing with you Keith POS... Piece of Sheiite although you meant positve

    some have explained that what you are doing does in fact sound better to some depending on speaker. I on the other hand have not tried as I have not had that kind of binding post.
    trying to remember what they call it.....vertical maybe
  • afterburnt
    afterburnt Posts: 7,892
    afterburnt wrote: »
    Ok geppy I can give you a WAG being that the load on your last configuration is asymmetrical due to the resitance across the jumpers the signal to the woofer is no longer propotional so it sounds lousy. How was that?

    oh you said "sound better" nevermind

  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,656
    Seriously burnt Keith has very good understanding of many things and has done moucho research for as on club Polk all around great guy you're bordering on troll here.
  • ken brydson
    ken brydson Posts: 8,779
    edited September 2015
    Back on topic I've never notice a difference in sound connecting to either upper or lower posts while using jumpers. Here's my LS90's. I connect to the uppers because the spades fit better...xczex034zbop.jpg
  • afterburnt
    afterburnt Posts: 7,892
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    Seriously burnt Keith has very good understanding of many things and has done moucho research for as on club Polk all around great guy you're bordering on troll here.

    What a troll?? I offered some kind of answer when no one else did. Seriously
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    Gee all sorts of comedy here Smart I like, smart A$$ not so much. ha Ha


    I trained others in techinical areas when I worked in audio but I am not sure about this one. The result has been the same on several pretty good speakers. It almost seems as though it makes it sound the same or close to the same as if there was one set of terminals. I did this with some Mirage M7si and PSB Gold i were it was easy to take the back plate off and tie the high end low together,. Then put then back and do the other hook up. They sound the close
    I saw something written up by Nordost which talks about this but does not explain why it may be best.

    Also the person with the 90s I would try running them to the bottom if you run it to the top your cables that goes to the tweeter and the rest of the entire FR, (including the all important midrange ) is being handled by jumpers?? Just a thought.
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    Ken ,So it would be hard for you to try that hook up it appears. It would be interesting to see what you think.
  • geppy1 wrote: »
    Ken ,So it would be hard for you to try that hook up it appears. It would be interesting to see what you think.

    I'll try and let you know.
  • ken brydson
    ken brydson Posts: 8,779
    edited September 2015
    Swapped them top to bottom and I don't hear any difference and I didn't expect to. Not sure why I would since they're connected together. Kinda like plugging into either the top or bottom plugs of an outlet and expect to get different voltage IMO...
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    I meant the cross hookup
  • drumminman
    drumminman Posts: 3,396
    geppy1 wrote: »
    I meant the cross hookup

    Many have reported SQ improvement doing that. Haven't tried it yet as I'm happy with my biwire.
    "Science is suppose to explain observations not dismiss them as impossible" - Norm on AA; 2.3TL's w/sonicaps/mills/jantzen inductors, Gimpod's boards, Lg Solen SDA inductors, RD-0198's, MW's dynamatted, Armaflex speaker gaskets, H-nuts, brass spikes, Cardas CCGR BP's, upgraded IC Cable, Black Hole Damping Sheet strips, interior of cabinets sealed with Loctite Power Grab, AI-1 interface with 1000VA A-L transformer
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    I should just take off the back plate and tie the high and low together Look at this

    From Nordost
    Wiring Confi gurations
    The correct wiring confi guration for a bi-wiring arrangement can be
    readily established by experimentation, but in general, the best results
    will be obtained as follows:
    Connect the jumpers from the bass/mid terminals to the treble terminals,
    following the guidance outlined above. Then connect the speaker wires
    to the bass/mid terminals. This should be your default set up, generally
    offering the greatest rhythmic integrity and mid-band clarity

    Very occasionally the reverse arrangement, connecting to the treble
    terminals can produce superior results. This is rare, but worth trying,
    especially where exotic or hard to drive tweeters are employed

    Often, the very best results are achieved using a diagonal connection.
    This involves connecting the red cable to the bass/mid terminal and
    the black to the treble, with the jumpers arranged accordingly, bass to
    treble on the red (or +ve) side of the crossover, treble to bass on the
    black (or -ve) side. This is slightly more confusing to wire, however, with
    a little extra care and patience the results can be well worthwhile, and
    once you are familiar with bi-wiring procedures this often becomes the
    new default set up, offering greater air, transparency, dimensionality and subtlety
  • geppy1
    geppy1 Posts: 3,075
    From Audioquest Note they say to put the pos to the high and neg to the low
    When using a single set of full range cables with a BiWirable speaker, you
    might as well do it properly … it costs nothing and makes a difference you
    can hear. When using jumpers (factory supplied or replacements), be sure
    to put both red and black connectors to the treble input of a 3-way or panelhybrid
    . Bass is less sensitive to having the jumpers in the signal path.
    For 2-way speakers, be sure to put the red connector to treble + and black
    connector to bass -. This is the only way to preserve the tonal voice the
    speaker designer intended.
    If you do not BiWire, at the very least, connect a single set of speaker cables
    as recommended above. Ideally, you should use a set of AQ PSC Jumpers
    to make the BiWire jumper connections at the speaker. What about those
    “free” shiny metal jumpers that came with the speaker? It’s entirely
    accurate to describe these as “worth every penny you paid for them.”
    Simply put, these are very poor sounding devices.



  • aprazer402
    aprazer402 Posts: 3,149
    So Geppy, if I'm reading your last two posts correctly, Nordost's diagonal wiring suggests red to low terminal and black to the high terminal, but your last post tells of Audioquest's diagonal wiring suggestion being reversed, red to high terminal and black to low terminal. Have you tried either diagonal connection?
  • pitdogg2
    pitdogg2 Posts: 25,656
    geppy1 wrote: »
    For many years now speakers come with 4 terminals for bi amp/bi wiring. research has shown few people do either but it continues. Whe I has in the audio biz it was one set regarless of the speaker and life was good. With 4 terminals it can be an endless choice of jumpers and hook up methods and they all make the speaker sound different. In my case I would use one of three hook ups regardless of jumpers used

    1) Cables to the low side . Jumpers feed the high side This make the most sense to me
    2) Cable to the high side Jumpers feedn the low side. Not sure why one would do this.
    3)Pos cable to the low side and neg to the high side. This one sounds way different then the other two and in most cases better WHAT IS IT DOING?? What is happening when you use this hook up?

    Thanks

    First post kind sir
  • aprazer402
    aprazer402 Posts: 3,149
    Thanks Pitdogg, I did read his initial post. Maybe what I should have asked, did he try reversing his 3) Pos to high and low to neg like Audioquest suggested. Just curious, as Geppy is, as to why or how this diagonal connection option (either way) would effect sound quality.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,997
    Just for the record, his AP Oval 9 speaker cables are not POS's. I would use AP jumpers though and not AQ.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    DK did a big write-up on this very subject. Of course, it applies to his system, but might give some guidance.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • aprazer402
    aprazer402 Posts: 3,149
    Cool, thanks BF, I'll search for it, just curious. It's Friday we have to get going!!!
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    Three hours to go before I get home. I turned the amps on before I left for work, so they will be ready.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.