Monitor 5b crossover versions question

cortico
cortico Posts: 587
in Vintage Speakers
Hi, is there any reason to prefer a later crossover with polyswitch over an earlier crossover with fuse protection?

Thanks, The schematic is identical with the exception of the parts mentioned above.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • skrol
    skrol Posts: 3,375
    Either XO is good and can be made better by swapping the electrolytic capacitors for film type. Generally folks around here like to get rid of the polyswitch.
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Benchmark DAC1, Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i; Technics SL-J2, Parasound PPH-100.

    HT:
    Marantz SR7010, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW110 , Marantz UD5005, Pioneer PL-530, Panasonic TC-P42S60

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-835R, AVR-888, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, 5B, TSi100, RM7, PSW10 (DXi104 upgrade); Pioneer: CT-6R; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, CDR-615; Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii, Sony CDP-650ESD, Technics SA 5070, B&W DM601
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cortico
    cortico Posts: 587
    Thanks, i have a earlier versions the fused recapped with clarity caps, bought a latter set because of the cabinets, they're in much better shape and have the finish I wanted.

    I will switch the cabinets and I was wondering is it was worth to keep the crossover as well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter