Hate To Break It To REL Owners....

Dr. Spec
Dr. Spec Posts: 3,780
Agreed - over the top for Polk's website. Post deleted. Thanks for the reality check, guys.
"What we do in life echoes in eternity"

Ed Mullen (emullen@svsound.com)
Director - Technology and Customer Service
SVS
Post edited by Dr. Spec on

Comments

  • hoosier21
    hoosier21 Posts: 4,411
    edited February 2004
    come on man, shouldn't SVS pay for the marketing that goes on this POLK AUDIO site?

    I respect you Dr. Spec. but this is a little over the line, don't you think?
    Dodd - Battery Preamp
    Monarchy Audio SE100 Delux - mono power amps
    Sony DVP-NS999ES - SACD player
    ADS 1230 - Polk SDA 2B
    DIY Stereo Subwoofer towers w/(4) 12 drivers each
    Crown K1 - Subwoofer amp
    Outlaw ICBM - crossover
    Beringher BFD - sub eq

    Where is the remote? Where is the $%#$% remote!

    "I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the most of us have...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
  • polkatese
    polkatese Posts: 6,767
    edited February 2004
    Doc,
    For HT, it is clear that SVS would win hands down against REL. Personally, I don't mind to own PB1+ to boot. Based on my listening habit, I use my system 60% more on music, and my REL Storm still surprise me with low-freq. details. For HT, it is adequate.
    I am sorry, I have no opinion on the matter. I am sure you do. So, don't mind me, I just want to talk audio and pie.
  • RuSsMaN
    RuSsMaN Posts: 17,987
    edited February 2004
    Wow. I guess REL better just close shop and go home, I mean someone over at HTF likes SVS? Who'da thought we'd ever see the day.

    :rolleyes:
    Check your lips at the door woman. Shake your hips like battleships. Yeah, all the white girls trip when I sing at Sunday service.