How are Klipsch KLF-10's?

Any experience with the KLF-10's?
They look pretty similar to 5.5's except 5.5's have bass port in the front where these have in the back.
5.5 - 1994 - 1997
KlF - 1997 - 2001 so looks like successor model of 5.5. :confused:

Klipsch RB81, KG3.5, B&W DM602.5, Polk.
Subwoofers: Klipsch RW10, Triad ProSub Bronze.

Comments

  • Mystery
    Mystery Posts: 2,546
    You may have guessed... yes they are in my house. :lol:

    It'll be interesting comparison against JBL SVA-1800's (similar size) and RF3's.
    Bad thing is I have RF3 and SVA's in the family room and not enough space to put these there so need to reorganize things to compare.
    And these and SVA's are pretty big and heavy to move around. Oh my back! :blush:

    Here are few cellphone pictures of quick test setup:

    15174865987_3c3721696b_h.jpg
    15174636369_45d7e0ae8b_b.jpg
    15174859297_81962b25f8_b.jpg
    15174630059_d95e1a3d0d_b.jpg

    Klipsch RB81, KG3.5, B&W DM602.5, Polk.
    Subwoofers: Klipsch RW10, Triad ProSub Bronze.
  • boston1450
    boston1450 Posts: 7,660
    My wife loved ours as lots of others do. They will rock. I personally hated them after about 30mins of listening. Had to shut them off. Horns didnt agree with my ears back to the SDA's i went. Those look very nice. We had some a tad bit darker in color & a plant pot stain on top :smile: nice speaker wife is still p/o at me LOL
    ..
  • Mystery
    Mystery Posts: 2,546
    edited September 2014
    Hmm...
    These KLF-10's don't sound bright if they are not toed in.
    I am liking them. They have great mids even without a mid horn.
    Sound little forward.
    However, SVA1800's sound smoother and more balanced but need quite a lot more power as they are not as efficient as KLF's.
    I removed all other speakers from that wall (Polks, black bostons and black klipsch) as shown above and now have only these three speakers there.
    Boston A400
    Klipsch KLF-10
    JBL SVA1800

    KLF-10's are supposed to be slightly taller than the SVA1800's but KLF's are missing those small pegs/feet on the bottom so are slightly shorter instead.
    Need to do more listening and if the KLF's don't hurt my head after 30 minutes, they may be keepers. :lol:

    Boston A400 are so slim compared to KLF's.
    I can fit more than two A400's and still KLF will be deeper. :open_mouth:

    15368134332_dbb23606d4_o.jpg

    Klipsch RB81, KG3.5, B&W DM602.5, Polk.
    Subwoofers: Klipsch RW10, Triad ProSub Bronze.
  • boston1450
    boston1450 Posts: 7,660
    The guy who bought ours still loves them 2 years later & it makes my day he is happy with them. They are a great speaker.
    ..
  • boston1450
    boston1450 Posts: 7,660
    On a different note-those Boston Acoustics are darn huge. I know how big the KLH's are so those gotta be big. Take up some real estate :smile: with narrow depth. I have owned smaller BA's & they are a great speaker. Cant imagine how nice those sound
    ..
  • Mystery
    Mystery Posts: 2,546
    edited September 2014
    boston1450 wrote: »
    On a different note-those Boston Acoustics are darn huge. I know how big the KLH's are so those gotta be big. Take up some real estate :smile: with narrow depth. I have owned smaller BA's & they are a great speaker. Cant imagine how nice those sound

    Yes, A400's are huge but since they are only 7" deep, they don't stick out to the room and take very small space.
    Weight wise, SVA1800's are 75lbs, KLF are 65lbs and A400 are around 60lbs .

    Since I bought the A400's, I've have had over 130 pairs of speakers come and go but these have survived so far. :smiley:
    I hope to get something that can beat these but so far no go and I'm not paying way too much just to achieve that. :wink:
    Post edited by Mystery on

    Klipsch RB81, KG3.5, B&W DM602.5, Polk.
    Subwoofers: Klipsch RW10, Triad ProSub Bronze.
  • gudnoyez
    gudnoyez Posts: 8,132
    Never heard those but have owned the CF-3s sold those to my brother so I can still listen to them but they were the best sounding Klipsch speakers I ever heard, I own a pair of Synergy B2s which are darn good bookies. If a pair of CF-3s came my way I would buy them. I know my brother would not sell his back to me.

    Enjoy those and curious as to what you think about those KLF-10s once you listen to them but you might want to get them up against the wall with a space of their own to really audition them.
    Home Theater
    Parasound Halo A 31 OnkyoTX-NR838 Sony XBR55X850B 55" 4K RtiA9 Fronts CsiA6 Center RtiA3 Rears FxiA6 Side Surrounds Dual Psw 111's Oppo 105D Signal Ultra Speaker Cables & IC's Signal Magic Power Cable Technics SL Q300 Panamax MR4300 Audioquest Chocolate HDMI Cables Audioquest Forest USB Cable

    2 Channel
    Adcom 555II Vincent SA-T1 Marantz SA 15S2 Denon DR-M11 Clearaudio Bluemotion SDA 2.3tl's (Z) edition MIT Terminator II Speaker Cables & IC's Adcom 545II Adcom Gtp-450 Marantz CD5004 Technics M245X SDA 2B's, SDA CRS+

    Stuff for the Head
    JD LABS C5 Headphone Amplifier, Sennheiser HD 598, Polk Audio Buckle, Polk Audio Hinge, Velodyne vPulse, Bose IE2, Sennheiser CX 200 Street II, Sennheiser MX 365

    Shower & Off the beaten path Rigs
    Polk Audio Boom Swimmer, Polk Audio Urchin B)
  • Mystery
    Mystery Posts: 2,546
    edited September 2014
    gudnoyez wrote: »
    Enjoy those and curious as to what you think about those KLF-10s once you listen to them but you might want to get them up against the wall with a space of their own to really audition them.

    I read threads that KLF-10's need around 5 feet in the back to get good bass otherwise they sound boomy or need to block the port. Need to read up more on that.
    I don't have room to do that.
    Right now they are around 6 inches from the back wall and toed out to tame the forwardness little bit.
    Sound good but SVA1800 may win the race here as they sound really good and smooth when given 3 times the power of KLF's. ;)

    Klipsch RB81, KG3.5, B&W DM602.5, Polk.
    Subwoofers: Klipsch RW10, Triad ProSub Bronze.