Poll: Are perfect 1:1 copies possible in the digital domain?

villianvillian Posts: 412
edited July 2014 in Going Digital
Is a digital music file able to be copied perfectly (Resulting in a 1:1 copy) to another location?


Just doing a quick survey. Feel free to state your opinion and why it is that way in the following posts. Also, if you believe that 1:1 digital copies are not possible and are willing to post about it, can you please explain what the difference would be between the source file, and the resulting duplicate file. This is assuming that the resulting file has passed all error checks and is a complete, ready to use, copy of the original. Regardless of transfer or copy method.
Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
Post edited by villian on
«13456789

Comments

  • nooshinjohnnooshinjohn Posts: 20,826
    edited June 2014
    I don't think there will ever be such ling as a perfect copy because of the digital language of 1's and 0's, unless they find a way to change the language, but I also believe it to be a mute point because things will inevitably advance to the point where the ear-brain will not be able to detect it.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, TriangleArt Reference SE with Pass Labs Xono Phono Preamp, Walker Precision Motor Drive, ClearAudio Goldfinger Diamond v2 cartridge and Origin Conquerer Mk3c tonearm, Polk Audio "Signature" Reference Series 1.2TL with complete mods, Pass Labs X0.2 three chassis preamp, PS Audio PerfectWave DAC MkII, Pioneer Elite SC-65, Oppo UDP-205 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk audio AB700/800 "in-wall" surrounds.

    Saying that it's "too hard" to pursue your dreams is no different than admitting to yourself that you are too lazy to achieve them.

    “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”
  • villianvillian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    I don't think there will ever be such ling as a perfect copy because of the digital language of 1's and 0's, unless they find a way to change the language, but I also believe it to be a mute point because things will inevitably advance to the point where the ear-brain will not be able to detect it.

    Fair enough, I appreciate the response! We can agree to disagree. I should probably clarify my original post to make sure everyone knows that I mean a copy of a sound that is already digital :)
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • pitdogg2pitdogg2 Posts: 13,775
    edited June 2014
    Yes.

    My reasoning is an article from Stereophile many years ago where a Sony head honcho stating that CD's are basically a master copy and everyone who buys a CD has a master the same as Sony. The same article he also stated the music industry wanted to do away with physical media because with advancements coming down the road no one will be able to protect their interest with such media.

    There should be no degradation between copy 1 and copy 1000 now try that with a cassette..
  • DSkipDSkip Posts: 15,974
    edited June 2014
    When something crawls up your butt, it really gets up there, doesn't it?
  • nooshinjohnnooshinjohn Posts: 20,826
    edited June 2014
    villian wrote: »
    Fair enough, I appreciate the response! We can agree to disagree. I should probably clarify my original post to make sure everyone knows that I mean a copy of a sound that is already digital :)

    Unless you are listening to Daft Punk, sound originates in the analog realm. This, to me anyway, means that something is lost in the transfer to digital from the very beginning. You can copy it after that all day long, but to me they can in no way duplicate the original, which is my goal.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, TriangleArt Reference SE with Pass Labs Xono Phono Preamp, Walker Precision Motor Drive, ClearAudio Goldfinger Diamond v2 cartridge and Origin Conquerer Mk3c tonearm, Polk Audio "Signature" Reference Series 1.2TL with complete mods, Pass Labs X0.2 three chassis preamp, PS Audio PerfectWave DAC MkII, Pioneer Elite SC-65, Oppo UDP-205 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk audio AB700/800 "in-wall" surrounds.

    Saying that it's "too hard" to pursue your dreams is no different than admitting to yourself that you are too lazy to achieve them.

    “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”
  • FTGVFTGV Posts: 3,628
    edited June 2014
    Hope you don't mind my posting this link,it is relevant to the topic.Since he makes his living with his ears,it's interesting to get an accomplished recording engineers take on several things regarding digital audio.
    http://twit.tv/show/home-theater-geeks/199
    It's long ish but informative.
  • BlueFoxBlueFox Posts: 11,528
    edited June 2014
    DSkip wrote: »
    When something crawls up your butt, it really gets up there, doesn't it?

    That is the nature of a TROLL.
    Bud - Silicon Valley

    Lumin X1
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD
    Pass XP-22 pre, X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers, SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on preamp, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • zane77zane77 Posts: 1,711
    edited June 2014
    FTGV wrote: »
    Hope you don't mind my posting this link,it is relevant to the topic.Since he makes his living with his ears,it's interesting to get an accomplished recording engineers take on several things regarding digital audio.
    http://twit.tv/show/home-theater-geeks/199
    It's long ish but informative.
    Listened to that entire episode, it was very interesting.
    Home Theater
    Onkyo PR-SC5508 Sharp LC-70LE847U
    Emotiva XPA-5 Emotiva XPA-2 Emotiva UPA-2
    Front RTi-A9 Wide RTi-A7 Center CSi-A6 Surround FXi-A6 Rear RTi-A3 Sub 2x PSW505
    Sony BDP-S790 Dishnetwork Hopper/Joey Logitech Harmony One Apple TV
    Two Channel
    Oppo 105D BAT VK-500 w/BatPack SDA SRS 2.3 Dreadnought Squeezebox Touch Apple TV
  • villianvillian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    BlueFox wrote: »
    That is the nature of a TROLL.

    You still didn't answer any of the questions I asked in response to your claims, but at this point I'm willing to forget that if you simply quit following me around calling me a troll on here. It's quite annoying.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • F1nutF1nut Posts: 42,171
    edited June 2014
    The same article he also stated the music industry wanted to do away with physical media because with advancements coming down the road no one will be able to protect their interest with such media.

    Bingo and just look at all the suckers swallowing that pill. Idiots, every last one of them.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


  • polrbehrpolrbehr Posts: 2,342
    edited June 2014
    F1nut wrote: »
    Bingo and just look at all the suckers swallowing that pill. Idiots, every last one of them.

    Heh heh.

    FWIW, I voted "Not Sure" - I was really curious about what color the resulting bar graph would be...
    So, are you willing to put forth a little effort or are you happy sitting in your skeptical poo pile?


    http://audiomilitia.proboards.com/
  • Habanero MonkHabanero Monk Posts: 716
    edited June 2014
    Attached is a 1.4MB Polk product manual that I have hashed with MD5.

    If you are on a Windows machine download and install checksum for Windows:

    64bit: http://corz.org/engine?section=windows&download=checksum_x64.zip

    32bit: http://corz.org/engine?section=windows&download=checksum.zip

    Download the attached PDF and hash file. Normally the hash file name format is filename.hash. I renamed to filename.hash.txt to make upload easier.

    After installation of the checksum utility you can right click on the PDF and run checksum. Upload the .hash file back to this thread and we can compare hashes.
    So hot it burns twice :eek:
  • Habanero MonkHabanero Monk Posts: 716
    edited June 2014
    F1nut wrote: »
    Bingo and just look at all the suckers swallowing that pill. Idiots, every last one of them.

    The industry is going to make sure that hook is swallowed all the way down and out the other end before reeling in tight.
    So hot it burns twice :eek:
  • helipilotdoughelipilotdoug Posts: 1,226
    edited June 2014
    I've tried ripping CD's to the computer and just can't seem to ever get a file that sounds as good as the original CD. Even bought a brand new drive to read the CD's but it's still not doing the job like I want. I'm toying with the idea of playing the CD's on the OPPO BDP 83SE, using the analog stereo out, and then through a A-D converter, just to see if that sounds any better. Has anyone tried this?
    Sunfire Theater Grand IV
    Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature
    SRS 2.1TL
    SDA 2BTL's
    CSiA6
    FXiA4
    FXiA6
    SDA 2A's
    Monitor 10A's

    http://www.douglasconnection.com
  • Habanero MonkHabanero Monk Posts: 716
    edited June 2014
    I've tried ripping CD's to the computer and just can't seem to ever get a file that sounds as good as the original CD. Even bought a brand new drive to read the CD's but it's still not doing the job like I want. I'm toying with the idea of playing the CD's on the OPPO BDP 83SE, using the analog stereo out, and then through a A-D converter, just to see if that sounds any better. Has anyone tried this?

    I would take a pressed CD. Rip it to full 1411Kbps .Wav (PCM). Then I would author it back to redbook on a CD.

    Have someone swap out CD's for you in a 20 run trial on your Oppo and see how you track. Just go Oppo analog out. No more conversion other than a Pre-amp or just Oppo's analog out to the amp.
    So hot it burns twice :eek:
  • EndersShadowEndersShadow Posts: 16,710
    edited June 2014
    Doug, its got to do with your equipment as well. The HRT Media Streamer your using to play from your computer is ok, but not as good as some of the DAC chips in lots of cd players.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • Habanero MonkHabanero Monk Posts: 716
    edited June 2014
    FTGV wrote: »
    Hope you don't mind my posting this link,it is relevant to the topic.Since he makes his living with his ears,it's interesting to get an accomplished recording engineers take on several things regarding digital audio.
    http://twit.tv/show/home-theater-geeks/199
    It's long ish but informative.

    I enjoy his interviews. Interesting that when they heard sonic differences they were able to go back and figure out it was how the CD's were pressed. Amazing.

    What is sad at 19:00 in talking about throwing half a million pressed CD's away because they sounded like garbage back then and now days no one gives a ****.
    So hot it burns twice :eek:
  • nooshinjohnnooshinjohn Posts: 20,826
    edited June 2014
    Doug, its got to do with your equipment as well. The HRT Media Streamer your using to play from your computer is ok, but not as good as some of the DAC chips in lots of cd players.

    sheesh... and people thing analog is hard, and expensive.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, TriangleArt Reference SE with Pass Labs Xono Phono Preamp, Walker Precision Motor Drive, ClearAudio Goldfinger Diamond v2 cartridge and Origin Conquerer Mk3c tonearm, Polk Audio "Signature" Reference Series 1.2TL with complete mods, Pass Labs X0.2 three chassis preamp, PS Audio PerfectWave DAC MkII, Pioneer Elite SC-65, Oppo UDP-205 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk audio AB700/800 "in-wall" surrounds.

    Saying that it's "too hard" to pursue your dreams is no different than admitting to yourself that you are too lazy to achieve them.

    “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”
  • Habanero MonkHabanero Monk Posts: 716
    edited June 2014
    The other way to ask this: Are 1:1 bit perfect digital copies impossible?
    So hot it burns twice :eek:
  • steveinazsteveinaz Posts: 18,987
    edited June 2014
    [Maj Payne voice]What's your angle boy?[/Maj Payne]
  • steveinazsteveinaz Posts: 18,987
    edited June 2014
    Over-thinking is not only exhausting and inefficient, it rarely pans out.
  • cnhcnh Posts: 13,310
    edited June 2014
    F1nut wrote: »
    Bingo and just look at all the suckers swallowing that pill. Idiots, every last one of them.

    Have to agree 100 percent here!

    Also on a slight digression, all this CLOUD computing makes me VERY NERVOUS. Just where is that taking us? Sure it is convenient, unless of course you can't get an internet connection; in that case you have NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING on your laptop! How's that? Disable web access and you cripple everyone!

    Can you make a perfect copy of anything? That's a question as Old as PLATO and our Greek philosopher would have answered in the negative.

    In modern day terms if an object does not occupy the same space in the same time, how can it be considered a perfect copy of it? It can't because, at the very least, it's newer and in a different location. lol

    Tis Friday, a day for conundrums, puzzles and aporias!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • villianvillian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    cnh wrote: »
    Also on a slight digression, all this CLOUD computing makes me VERY NERVOUS. Just where is that taking us? Sure it is convenient, unless of course you can't get an internet connection; in that case you have NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING on your laptop! How's that? Disable web access and you cripple everyone!
    cnh

    Good point. The problem is that the "Web" is not a tangible thing, and is spread throughout the entire world on millions of servers. Yet still, I agree with you and think it's a weak point. No power, no web. Spread a bug to infect those servers, and likewise..no web. Relying too much on something is a failure either way.
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • falconcry72falconcry72 Posts: 3,579
    edited June 2014
    Unless you are listening to Daft Punk, sound originates in the analog realm. This, to me anyway, means that something is lost in the transfer to digital from the very beginning. You can copy it after that all day long, but to me they can in no way duplicate the original, which is my goal.

    Not really. Sound originates in air. I would argue that more information is lost in an analog transducer's original conversion from air to electrical signal to physical medium than is lost by a conversion from that analog medium to digital. Either way, that's not the question here.
    2-Channel:

    Source 1: PC
    Source 2: Rega Apollo
    DAC: McIntosh D-100
    Preamp: Audio Research LS-26
    Power Amp: Pass Labs X-250.5
    Speakers: Magnepan 3.7's

    HT:

    Source 1: HTPC
    Source 2: Oppo 103
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV-8801
    Power Amp: Bryston 9B-ST
    Fronts: Sonus Faber Liuto Towers
    Center: Sonus Faber Liuto Smart Center
    Surrounds: Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves
    Subs: Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
  • nooshinjohnnooshinjohn Posts: 20,826
    edited June 2014
    Not really. Sound originates in air. I would argue that more information is lost in an analog transducer's original conversion from air to electrical signal to physical medium than is lost by a conversion from that analog medium to digital. Either way, that's not the question here.


    The whole question then is irrelevant, because unless you have the performers live and you are in the room with them, everything else is a poor copy. If you cannot get a perfect 1-1 copy of the original performance from the start, as you suggest, even a perfect copy of a copy is still a flawed copy.

    Air BTW does not move digitally. It moves organically and naturally based upon the sound being produced. It flows... Digital sound looses that as soon as it becomes 1's and 0's. A GREAT DAC improves things, but I must say that my turntable still sounds better than my Elite D9-MkII.
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, TriangleArt Reference SE with Pass Labs Xono Phono Preamp, Walker Precision Motor Drive, ClearAudio Goldfinger Diamond v2 cartridge and Origin Conquerer Mk3c tonearm, Polk Audio "Signature" Reference Series 1.2TL with complete mods, Pass Labs X0.2 three chassis preamp, PS Audio PerfectWave DAC MkII, Pioneer Elite SC-65, Oppo UDP-205 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk audio AB700/800 "in-wall" surrounds.

    Saying that it's "too hard" to pursue your dreams is no different than admitting to yourself that you are too lazy to achieve them.

    “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.”
  • falconcry72falconcry72 Posts: 3,579
    edited June 2014
    The whole question then is irrelevant, because unless you have the performers live and you are in the room with them, everything else is a poor copy. If you cannot get a perfect 1-1 copy of the original performance from the start, as you suggest, even a perfect copy of a copy is still a flawed copy.

    Air BTW does not move digitally. It moves organically and naturally based upon the sound being produced. It flows... Digital sound looses that as soon as it becomes 1's and 0's. A GREAT DAC improves things, but I must say that my turntable still sounds better than my Elite D9-MkII.

    "perfect copy is still a flawed copy". Agree with that... with the caveat that if a flawed copy is the best you got, it's critical to not allow it to get more flawed.

    BTW, I was in no way insinuating that digital is superior to analog, not at all. I was just minimizing the significance of the analog > digital conversion relative to the air > analog conversion.
    2-Channel:

    Source 1: PC
    Source 2: Rega Apollo
    DAC: McIntosh D-100
    Preamp: Audio Research LS-26
    Power Amp: Pass Labs X-250.5
    Speakers: Magnepan 3.7's

    HT:

    Source 1: HTPC
    Source 2: Oppo 103
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV-8801
    Power Amp: Bryston 9B-ST
    Fronts: Sonus Faber Liuto Towers
    Center: Sonus Faber Liuto Smart Center
    Surrounds: Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves
    Subs: Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
  • villianvillian Posts: 412
    edited June 2014
    The whole question then is irrelevant, because unless you have the performers live and you are in the room with them, everything else is a poor copy. If you cannot get a perfect 1-1 copy of the original performance from the start, as you suggest, even a perfect copy of a copy is still a flawed copy.

    Air BTW does not move digitally. It moves organically and naturally based upon the sound being produced. It flows... Digital sound looses that as soon as it becomes 1's and 0's. A GREAT DAC improves things, but I must say that my turntable still sounds better than my Elite D9-MkII.

    But..it is possible to get a perfect copy of a "Flawed" copy then..correct?
    Too many good quotes to list..waiting for some fresh ammo. :)
  • falconcry72falconcry72 Posts: 3,579
    edited June 2014
    villian wrote: »
    But..it is possible to get a perfect copy of a "Flawed" copy then..correct?

    I hope so! And I believe so.
    2-Channel:

    Source 1: PC
    Source 2: Rega Apollo
    DAC: McIntosh D-100
    Preamp: Audio Research LS-26
    Power Amp: Pass Labs X-250.5
    Speakers: Magnepan 3.7's

    HT:

    Source 1: HTPC
    Source 2: Oppo 103
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV-8801
    Power Amp: Bryston 9B-ST
    Fronts: Sonus Faber Liuto Towers
    Center: Sonus Faber Liuto Smart Center
    Surrounds: Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves
    Subs: Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
  • steveinazsteveinaz Posts: 18,987
    edited June 2014
    You guys give the phrase "wrapped around the axle" a whole new meaning. Stop "geeking" on go listen.
  • falconcry72falconcry72 Posts: 3,579
    edited June 2014
    steveinaz wrote: »
    You guys give the phrase "wrapped around the axle" a whole new meaning. Stop "geeking" on go listen.

    Sage advice :)
    2-Channel:

    Source 1: PC
    Source 2: Rega Apollo
    DAC: McIntosh D-100
    Preamp: Audio Research LS-26
    Power Amp: Pass Labs X-250.5
    Speakers: Magnepan 3.7's

    HT:

    Source 1: HTPC
    Source 2: Oppo 103
    Pre/Pro: Marantz AV-8801
    Power Amp: Bryston 9B-ST
    Fronts: Sonus Faber Liuto Towers
    Center: Sonus Faber Liuto Smart Center
    Surrounds: Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves
    Subs: Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
This discussion has been closed.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!