Interesting point about RDO-194s vs SL-2000s

SciFiTom
SciFiTom Posts: 58
edited May 2014 in Vintage Speakers
While I was fiddling with the tweeters to do response plots, I noticed that the 194s must have a different body material, or are just thinner. When ticked with a fingernail, the click is a much higher frequency than that of the SL-2000s, and decays more slowly, to the point where I'd expect it to be in their operating range. Hmm. Perhaps it's time for the Armaflex tape?
Post edited by SciFiTom on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,554
    edited May 2014
    I think we are all aware that the plastic housing of the RD0's isn't as thick as the SL2000 or SL3000. However, I don't think it matters one bit as it relates to the sound as the housing is screwed down tight and both RD0's sound much better than the originals.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."

    President of Club Polk

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter