By Request: Response plots on 2.3 - SL2000 vs RDO-194 tweeters

SciFiTom
SciFiTom Posts: 58
edited May 2014 in Vintage Speakers
OldmanSRS requested these, and I was curious, too. Since these are from my listening position, with room reflections, etc., I attempted to (nearly) match yesterday's plot of the 194s, but included a plot from today as the baseline.

Black s/b the 194s, red, the SL-2000s.

PolkR194vsSL2000050414.jpg
Post edited by SciFiTom on

Comments

  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited May 2014
    Design goal met.....
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • OldmanSRS
    OldmanSRS Posts: 419
    edited May 2014
    Thanks for the plot. I would have expected much more difference the way most everyone hates them. I guess there's more to hate than just the response.
    '65 427 Shelby Cobra
    '72 Triumph TR-6
    __________________
    '88 Polk SDA SRS 1.2, with upgraded XO caps and Erse SDA inductors
    '86 Polk SDA CRS+
    '84 Polk Monitor 10A (Peerless tweeters)
    '05 HSU VTF-3 Sub (Original OEM)
    '20 HSU VTF-3 Sub (three more, 100% cloned)
    '93 Carver TFM-35
    '88 Carver M-1.0t
    '88 Adcom GFT-555
    '88 Adcom GFP-555
    '88 Adcom GFA-555 (upgraded/restored)
    '88 Adcom GFA-555 (a second one upgraded/restored)
    '05 Onkyo DV-555 media
    '89 Fosgate 360 Digital Space Matrix
    '89 Fosgate 360 Digital Space Matrix, internal surround amp bridged to drive only a center channel
    '91 Kenwood Basic M1D Amp
    '89 Pioneer Laser Disc media
    '89 Sony SuperBeta HiFi media
    One PGA2310 based custom built remote volume control
    Four Polk T-15's
    Four Polk TSi-200's
    Four Polk TSi-100's
    Two Polk CS-10's
  • Dennis Gardner
    Dennis Gardner Posts: 4,861
    edited May 2014
    OldmanSRS wrote: »
    Thanks for the plot. I would have expected much more difference the way most everyone hates them. I guess there's more to hate than just the response.

    I isn't that peak at 12khz that is the issue. It is that the driver goes from being under the new driver from 1-3 kHz to being over it at 12khz. This makes it harsh sounding to some. The 194 is simply better balanced from bottom to top.
    HT Optoma HD25 LV on 80" DIY Screen, Anthem MRX 300 Receiver, Pioneer Elite BDP 51FD Polk CS350LS, Polk SDA1C, Polk FX300, Polk RT55, Dual EBS Adire Shiva 320watt tuned to 17hz, ICs-DIY Twisted Prs, Speaker-Raymond Cable

    2 Channel Thorens TD 318 Grado ZF1, SACD/CD Marantz 8260, Soundstream/Krell DAC1, Audio Mirror PP1, Odyssey Stratos, ADS L-1290, ICs-DIY Twisted , Speaker-Raymond Cable
  • DracoAmericanus
    DracoAmericanus Posts: 112
    edited May 2014
    thank you for the plots, it is differently interesting thank you for posting that
    There is no cure....
    Luxman M117, SDA SRS 2.3, rear monitor 10, back rear bose 4.2, valodyne sub and 2 Onkyo m-504 amps Onkyo TX-NR709
    8mm, 7.62x39mm
  • StantonZ
    StantonZ Posts: 444
    edited May 2014
    Good stuff!
    Yamaha RX-A2050 AVR (5.0.2); LG OLED77C2 4K TV
    (4) Polk Monitor 10B's w/SoniCaps, Mills, and RDO-194 tweets (R/L F/R)
    (2) Polk RC80i (Top Middle)
    Polk CS300 center channel
    Analog: B&O TX2 Turntable, Nakamichi Cassette Deck 1
    Digital: Pioneer CLD-99 Elite LD, Panasonic DMP-UB900 UHD Blu-Ray
    Bedroom: Arylic Up2Stream AMPv3 driving Polk Monitor 4's w/peerless tweets
  • SciFiTom
    SciFiTom Posts: 58
    edited May 2014
    Excellent point Mr. Gardner. I hadn't considered the matter from the perspective of the overall slope.
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited May 2014
    What distance were these measured from?

    Distortion measurements may tell us more than just FR.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • SciFiTom
    SciFiTom Posts: 58
    edited May 2014
    Face,
    these plots are from my listening position, so the distance is about 15 Ft.

    I've moved on from the tweeters discussed in this post to the TL XO (tweeters only) and 198s. While I left the stock XO in place, so I could revert if needed, I'd really rather not return to the scene of that crime. I think this post already says all I wanted to say about the other tweeters.
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited May 2014
    If you want a clean measurement of the tweeters, try from only 3' away. At 15', you're measuring the speaker and how it interacts with the room.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • SciFiTom
    SciFiTom Posts: 58
    edited May 2014
    The standard is 1 meter, and then I'd have to at least drag them outside, since I don't know of any anechoic chambers in the area in the audio range. I was also concerned that 1 meter might be a bit short given the 3 tweeters. Lastly, my ears are usually at 15 Ft. :)
    If I get around to posting what I just did, the picture will improve lots.
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited May 2014
    You don't need to drag them outside, you can play with gating and also place a bass trap on the floor between the speaker and mic. You can also increase the distance to 2M to allow better driver summing.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • SciFiTom
    SciFiTom Posts: 58
    edited May 2014
    Face wrote: »
    You don't need to drag them outside, you can play with gating and also place a bass trap on the floor between the speaker and mic. You can also increase the distance to 2M to allow better driver summing.

    Truth, though I don't have bass traps at the moment. I do use a 4x6Ft. panel of HF absorbers on the outside of each speaker - about 4Ft. away, but the room is almost 800 sq.Ft. without a wall on the right side of the speaker locations, other than the skinny stuff mounting the foam panels (Auralex 2in. wedges), and vaulted ceilings going the wrong way. I've only got the OmniMic2 from Dayton Audio, and I haven't found a gating control. It seems like it's kind 'a running open loop depending on the DVD, rather than some sort of tracking sweep generator. The 15 Ft. bit is why I only provided comparative measurements.
  • Joe08867
    Joe08867 Posts: 3,919
    edited May 2014
    Those plots are exactly how i would expect them to look, not enough from 1k-4k and to much above 10k especially at 12k.

    That is why I have replaced all of mine with 194's.