What do you think of this??

rromeo923

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/12/21/heres-why-you-should-convert-your-music-to-432hz/


i tried it and did not hear any difference. Maybe some of you can??

rromeo923

Actually I did a side by side comparison with five other people in the room and it was unanimous that we all preferred the 432. I didnt tell any of them what I was doing. I just said I want to compare two recordings of the same song (Something, The Beatles)

xsmi

The crazy thing is that European musicians and orchestras tune to A=442 which is a smudge HIGHER than the 440 pitch in this article. VERY interesting. Thank you.

cnh

That's certainly a hearable difference. The 440hz tone sounds higher than the lower frequency. Is 432hz more pleasing? It sounds a little "softer" to me. But the rest of the reasoning seems "suspect"!

I am not a professional musician, but when you tune an instrument using an electronic tuning is there NOT an absolute frequency that it ALWAYS tunes to?

And was not most so-called ancient music based on a "different" scale from the present day scale? So might that NOT be the tuning difference, merely a matter of a different system ?

The idea that everything has a Vibration of some kind is as old as Hindu philosophy. The problem? There are many many many kinds of vibrations. Look at string theory and all the wondrous particles of the Quantum world, each undulating back and forth to its own rhythm? lol

cnh