Most powerful 5 channel amp

2»

Comments

  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited January 2004
    Originally posted by Manamp


    In that case it is VERY possible to get 1700 watts as each channel would only need to develop 58.5 volts (117/2) which is about 427 watts per channel into 8 ohms. To get 427 watts, you need rails of approximately +/- 100 or 200. This is very “doable” and I suspect CAL would be using the On Semi devices in 2119X series either in TO-3 or flatpak.

    I hope I was less confusing this time.

    Peace to all.

    I see where you are going and no dispute here other than the fact that you left off the contribution of the Flux Capacitor;)

    No issue here other than your blanket statement calling someone full of **** without a full understanding of the total intent. IMHO that is wrong and should not happen here.

    HBomb
    ***WAREMTAE***
  • Manamp
    Manamp Posts: 71
    edited January 2004
    HBomb,

    I called no one full of s*** . (on this thread that is).

    As far as understanding the full intent, DynamiteD made the statement, "The amp is advertised at 5 x 500 but it can really do 1700 x 5. "

    If it can do 1700 watts X5 channels then thats not bridged because you cannot bridge 5 channels and still end up with 5. Thats what I based my analogy on.

    No offense to DynamiteD or the Carver lover who seems cross with me.

    MA.
    If you are not judgemental, you don't care enough.
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,092
    edited January 2004
    Originally posted by Manamp
    TroyD,

    As I said, I wish you many years of happy listening to Carver amps. You have every right to like them or dislike them as do I.

    However let me first put my thoughts about Bob in perspective.

    Bob has been a fascination in the industry, I have a lot of respect for his innovation and designs. He has put a breath of fresh air into the industry with his radical designs. He is a genius when it comes to innovating, but I still think he is deaf and I don't like the sound of his amps. To me he is the Bose of the power-amp industry.

    Those expoits you talk about were rip-offs of other designs (i.e. the "t" series). And the reason they sounded good was that he copied the transfer function of those amps, a technique he developed (another innovation) not by using his own ears to voice them.

    I would be among the first to go up and read his latest design, I am fascinated by his technical prowess, but I still think he is deaf.

    I am honored that you even attempt to compare a humble enthausiast as myself with the great Bob Carver... but thats a gross insult to him. He has achieved things in life most of us would dream of, but I still think he is deaf.

    Apologies in advance if you are related to him in some way.:D

    What a minute, you don't like the sound of his amps but the reason that they sounded good was because he copied the transfer function of other amps. Which is it? Do you like the sound of the amps or do you not?

    Bob Carver can HARDLY be compared to Bose. Both employ marketing to thier advantage HOWEVER, Carver's products were priced well BELOW what a comparable product from another audio manufacturer could offer. Bose, on the other hand, uses his marketing campaign to do the opposite, offer less and charge more.

    Also, I wasn't comparing you to Bob Carver. Apples and oranges. Start a couple of fantastically successful audio companies and design your own amps, THEN we'll compare.

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut
  • Manamp
    Manamp Posts: 71
    edited January 2004
    TroyD,

    I really don't want to get into a pissing contest with anyone. I am trying to get closure on this yet you keep coming back with irksome comments.

    I think this argument has lost its lustre and more importantly it's cause.

    I bid you peace and hope to encounter you in better circumstances,

    regards,
    If you are not judgemental, you don't care enough.
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited January 2004
    Originally posted by Manamp
    TroyD,

    I really don't want to get into a pissing contest with anyone. I am trying to get closure on this yet you keep coming back with irksome comments.


    After reviewing some of your other writings I believe I and perhaps others may be confusing your very abrupt statements and approach as a potential attack. You have a unique approach while addressing topics thats all.

    I think I have figured you out and no harm nor foul perceived here.

    HBomb
    ***WAREMTAE***
  • Manamp
    Manamp Posts: 71
    edited January 2004
    I am too old to change writing habits Hbomb ;)

    But I can assure you that regardless of the seemingly cockiness people perceive in my writings, I do not have delusions of grandeur. I only try and share what I have learnt the hard way and hope others will either appreciate the help or benefit from my erratic experiences.

    I am pretty passionate about hi-fi in general (as most guys here are) but amplifiers in particular.

    I just try and help out when I can.

    There will always be jerks around and I think we should give people a chance before jumping to conclusions, I appreciate your mature approach... I will try and be more "politically correct" but don't hold your breaths. :D

    MA.
    If you are not judgemental, you don't care enough.
  • HBombToo
    HBombToo Posts: 5,256
    edited January 2004
    Originally posted by Manamp
    I am too old to change writing habits Hbomb ;)

    I will try and be more "politically correct" but don't hold your breaths. :D

    MA.

    alright already!!!! please lets not bring up politics again!!!:p

    1/4Twin;)
    ***WAREMTAE***