Monitor 70 with no subwoofer?

critical_gp
critical_gp Posts: 84
edited April 2013 in Speakers
Hey guys,

I recently moved into a new place (first home/condo) and the place does not have a good place and space for my sub.

My current set-up:
Yamaha RX-V1900
Monitor 60 up front
CS2 Center
PSW10 sub
no rears

I know this is not the most loved sub on here but it does a decent job filling the room. I wanted to know if it would be worth getting rid of the M60s and the sub and getting M70s instead with no sub. Would my receiver be able to drive the M70 and give me plenty of bass given the bigger drivers? Not looking to get an amp tho. I usually do 70/30 music/movies.

Thanks
Audio system lost to water damage... :(
Post edited by critical_gp on

Comments

  • specd_out
    specd_out Posts: 505
    edited November 2012
    I dont really think so. Thats a good AVR but small drivers dont always dig deep enough. I have a5s which have 2 6.5" drivers. Even though I have them connected to my Carver m1.0t (200wpc) which added considerably more bass, Its still lacking in the lower end. I am considering getting a psw111 for 2ch music and use my dsw600 for movies only.
    HT Rig Samsung 64F8500 |Pioneer Elite BDP-52FD|Pioneer Elite VSX-32| Two Carver TFM-15cb Bridged for mains|Polk Audio RTiA5 Cherry|Polk Audio CsiA6 Cherry|Polk Audio T-15 Heights|Polk Audio FXia6 Surround|DIY 8cuft Dayton Ultimax 15" powered with a Crown XLS1000
    2Channel Rig Polk Audio LSi9 Cherry| Carver C-1BillD Mod|Carver M1.0t MkII Opt2|Pro-ject RM 1.3|SpeedBox S|AQ King Cobras|AQ Rocket88|
    ISF Level 2 Certified Calibrator
  • sponger
    sponger Posts: 325
    edited November 2012
    I mainly listen to hard rock, heavy metal, alternative, and whatever category Phish falls into. My 70s minus the sub handled the low-end from that music to my complete satisfaction. Not that I don't like hip-hop, trance, rap, etc., but I don't listen to any of that at all. So, I can't say how these speakers would perform in those situations.

    There was, however, a considerable difference between sub and no sub when it came to home theater applications. I guess that goes without saying.
    Denon X7200WA
    LSiM 705 703 704c
    Denon DP 400
    Yamaha CDC 775
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited November 2012
    I tried the M60s with no sub and they sound nice in 2 channel mode. The lack of bass is evident though. If the M70s fill the room a little better due to the bigger drivers it'll be fantastic.

    What are your thoughts on wireless subwoofers? Possible recommendations? Budget $500
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(
  • Upstatemax
    Upstatemax Posts: 2,685
    edited November 2012
    With a $500 sub budget...

    Look into the def tech supercube series and the Velodyne Spl series. Small, musical and can throw a large amount of bass for the size. I picked up a "refurbished" SPL 1000 II from velodyne for $499 shipped to my door...

    If you go used, they can be had for even less.
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited November 2012
    Wife doesn't approve the $500 budget. I found a PSWI225 for under $200... how is that sub?
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(
  • ThereIsNoEye
    ThereIsNoEye Posts: 17
    edited November 2012
    Wife doesn't approve the $500 budget. I found a PSWI225 for under $200... how is that sub?

    Can't do the Polk PSW505 or Bic F-12 for a few dollars more?

    If so, I would go with one of those.

    I would probably lean toward the Bic F-12 for movies and the Polk PSW505 for music.
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited November 2012
    Space and placement do not allow for wired subwoofer....
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited November 2012
    How does the PSWI225 compare to PSW10?
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(
  • Derrick4Real
    Derrick4Real Posts: 46
    edited November 2012
    Currently running a pair of M70s, a CS2 and occasionally the PSWI225 off of an Onkyo TX-SR607. I live on a 2nd floor apartment with wood flooring and high ceilings so the acoustics can be tricky. 80/20 TV/Music.

    In regard to the TV being the main focus of my setup...the CS2 combined with Monitor 70s (no rears) handles bass very well with no sub. It's great to have the PSWI225 for those times when I'm watching a movie and want to turn it up a notch and flip the sub on for a fuller experience, etc...but the 70s without the PSWI225 can stand on their own just fine.
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-SR607 7.2
    TV: Samsung Q70C 55" 2023
    Remote: Logitech Harmony One
    Blu-Ray: Sony NSZ-GT1 with Google TV
    Streaming: Chromecast w Google TV 4K
    Fronts: Polk Monitor 70
    Center: Polk CS2
    Sub: Polk PSWi225
    Rears: Polk Monitor 40
  • RamZet
    RamZet Posts: 792
    edited November 2012
    The Yamaha is pumping out what, 130watts per channel? Its looks to be a good piece of hardware. I can drive my Monitor70s with 95watts each and they sound great. The bass will be fine for music. With four drivers and the bass turned a bit high they will amaze you. How ever in HT mode you will lack that deep rumble. Even if you configure that Yamaha to do 5.0 surround sound it will not give you deep base in HT mode.
    So for 2ch audio the m70 has lots and lots of bass but in HT I would get a sub.
    B&W CM9Classé Sigma
  • Geoff4rfc
    Geoff4rfc Posts: 2,469
    edited November 2012
    Some of you guys must have some magical set ups. The M70's I owned needed lots of power to sound great and to make decent bass. When I first had mine, they were driven off my AVR which was 135wpc with just two channels driven, anything over that and the power drops.

    I had my kid over and put in a Best of Stevie Ray Vaughn CD, after a few minutes, my kid asks, "shouldn't is sound better than that?"

    Once I started feeding the M70's 200wpc, they opened up and sounded much better. When I sold them, I demoed them with an amp pushing 300wpc through them, they sounded so good, I almost didn't sell them. And, that was the first time I heard them putting out some real bass. Even the buyer was relieved that he didn't have to buy a sub right away, but I warned him, if he got them home and they didn't sound as good, it was because I was pumping all that power through them.

    If you want M70's and you want to them to perform their best, you've got to feed them, and since you're not considering an amp, my recommendation is to keep your 60's and get a decent sub, too bad about your restrictions, an Epic Legend could have done you some good.
    Source: BRP Panasonic UB9000, CDP Emotiva ERC3 - Display: LG OLED EVO 83 C3 - Pre/Pro: Marantz 8802A - Amplification: Emotiva XPA-DR3, XPA-2 x 2, XPA-6, Speakers, Mains/2ch-Focal Kanta No2's, C-LSiM706, S-702F/X, RS-RTiA9's, WS-RTiA9's, FH-RTiA3's, Subs - Epik Empire x 2

    Cables: AudioQuest McKenzie XLR's/CDP/Amp, Carbon 48/BRP, Forest 48/Display, 2 channel speaker cable: Furutech FS Alpha 36 12AWG PCOCC Single Crystal (Douglas Connection)

    EXPERIENCE: next to nothing, but I sure enjoy audio and video MY OPINION OF THIS HOBBY: I may not be a smart man, but I know what quicksand is.
    When I was young, I was Superman but now that old age has gotten the best of me I'm only Batman
  • Upstatemax
    Upstatemax Posts: 2,685
    edited November 2012
    How does the PSWI225 compare to PSW10?

    I liked the pswi225 more than the psw10. Tighter and I felt it distorted less. Plus the wireless feature is really nice.
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited April 2013
    Bringing this back from the dead...

    Will I be able to squeeze more bass out of the M60 or M70s with Yamaha RX-V1900 and Yamaha A-S500 AMP?
    That would be 130W + 85W = 215W per channel in stereo mode.
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(
  • philltran
    philltran Posts: 2
    edited April 2013
    Bringing this back from the dead...

    Will I be able to squeeze more bass out of the M60 or M70s with Yamaha RX-V1900 and Yamaha A-S500 AMP?
    That would be 130W + 85W = 215W per channel in stereo mode.

    How do you get the AVR internal Amp and the external to add up the power like that? Are you planning on doing bi amping the speakers or some other secret sauce?
  • PolkieMan
    PolkieMan Posts: 2,446
    edited April 2013
    POLK SDA 2.3 TLS BOUGHT NEW IN 1990, Gimpod/Sonic Caps/Mills RDO-198
    POLK CSI-A6 POLK MONITOR 70'S ONKYO TX NR-808 SONY CDP-333ES
    PIONEER PL-510A SONY BDP S5100
    POLK SDA 1C BOUGHT USED 2011,Gimpod/Sonic Caps/Mills RDO-194
    ONKYO HT RC-360 SONY BDP S590 TECHNICS SL BD-1
  • Geoff4rfc
    Geoff4rfc Posts: 2,469
    edited April 2013
    Bringing this back from the dead...

    Will I be able to squeeze more bass out of the M60 or M70s with Yamaha RX-V1900 and Yamaha A-S500 AMP?
    That would be 130W + 85W = 215W per channel in stereo mode.

    I guess you didn't read my post. I'll give it you like this; the M70 is rated 275 @ max power. Give it 300wpc and you'll get in your face bass with movies and music.

    It's just not cost effective in your case, I'd just stick to getting a better sub.
    Source: BRP Panasonic UB9000, CDP Emotiva ERC3 - Display: LG OLED EVO 83 C3 - Pre/Pro: Marantz 8802A - Amplification: Emotiva XPA-DR3, XPA-2 x 2, XPA-6, Speakers, Mains/2ch-Focal Kanta No2's, C-LSiM706, S-702F/X, RS-RTiA9's, WS-RTiA9's, FH-RTiA3's, Subs - Epik Empire x 2

    Cables: AudioQuest McKenzie XLR's/CDP/Amp, Carbon 48/BRP, Forest 48/Display, 2 channel speaker cable: Furutech FS Alpha 36 12AWG PCOCC Single Crystal (Douglas Connection)

    EXPERIENCE: next to nothing, but I sure enjoy audio and video MY OPINION OF THIS HOBBY: I may not be a smart man, but I know what quicksand is.
    When I was young, I was Superman but now that old age has gotten the best of me I'm only Batman
  • critical_gp
    critical_gp Posts: 84
    edited April 2013
    Thanks... i guess I just have to deal with the sub placement. Will be picking up a PSW505 soon.
    Audio system lost to water damage... :(