Polk Audio RTi A9 vs Pioneer SP-FS52

crzycuyler
crzycuyler Posts: 16
edited November 2012 in Speakers
I know these are very different prices, but I am hoping to find out if there is any reason to dish out the extra cash for the RTi A9s. These Pioneers are getting fantastic reviews and are being compared to much better speakers. The A9s are not receiving as much praise. Any advice?
Post edited by crzycuyler on
«1

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,814
    edited November 2012
    I took a look around and did not find much in the way of reviews for the Pioneer speakers. However, I did find a lot of positive reviews for the Polk's, so not sure where you're looking.

    I have heard the A9's properly powered and they are quite the performer. However, if you plan on driving them with the average AVR, you will be disappointed as they need an amp.

    As I haven't heard the Pioneer's I can only offer a comparision based on specs.

    The Pioneer speakers:
    Weight - listed as between 21 lbs. and 29 lbs. each (not sure why different sites list different weights) Hell, I have CDP's that weigh considerably more than that!!!
    Frequency Response - 40Hz-20kHz (no one states if that is the -3dB spec or what. IMO, never a good sign)
    Efficiency - 87dB (kind of low meaning it takes more power for them to sound as loud as the Polk's)
    Warranty - 1 year
    List Price - $130.00 each

    I thought this comment summed them up nicely, for the shoestring-budgeted enthusiast.

    The Polk speakers:
    Weight - 75 lbs. each
    Frequency Response - the -3dB is 30Hz-26kHz
    Efficiency - 90dB (still need an amp to drive them properly)
    Warranty - 5 years
    List Price - $750.00 each (can be had for much less)


    It's been my experience in this hobby that generally speaking, you get what you pay for and more importantly, there are NO giant killers, only wishful (possibly delusional) dreamers and those without experience.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,020
    edited November 2012
    Not even close to an apples to apples comparison there champ. I would suggest you get the Pioneers, that way you'll appreciate better sound when you decide to move up the food chain.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Tankman
    Tankman Posts: 419
    edited November 2012
    Reason?Heres a link,and 13 reasons why the RTI-A9 are better then any Pioneer speaker that I can think of.http://www.amazon.com/Polk-Audio-Floorstanding-Speaker-Single/dp/B000V2SEX2/ref=sr_1_8?s=aht&ie=UTF8&qid=1351848444&sr=1-8.But too each his own I say.
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    Thanks for looking in to it for me, F1nut! tonyb, I know these are very different speakers. I am actually coming from B&W 685 and ASW610 and am looking for a better value (and floor standing speakers). I will be powering whatever speakers I get with my current AVR3312. I may or may not upgrade my amplifier down the road, but I do have pre outs. The Pioneers are new, and I never wanted to like them, but they were designed by Andrew Jones. This is not enough to impress me, but people are saying he put some genius to work on these budget speakers.

    If I went with the RTi A9s, I would have to use only them with my AVR and maybe even bi-amp. There would be no room for my amp to have additional channels, correct?

    With the Pioneer, I can save money and know that my AVR3312 will power the whole set.

    Tankman, those are pretty good reviews, and they certainly hold some weight. I found many threads that don't give as much praise. It was said to have a harsh lower treble, I believe.

    Main use will be HT(65%) and Music(35%).
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited November 2012
    Welcome to Club Polk!

    I've heard that series of Pioneer powered by AVRs and a comparable set of TSI-400s (the Polk series below the Rti-A9s) and, frankly, the Polks wiped the floor with them, it wasn't even close. It doesn't matter who designs something. There are "cost" constraints. And you just can't put quality parts, crossovers, etc., in a speaker that's that cheap, especially a "tower". So Pio is probably giving us some simple "market" hype here! Because they (Pioneer) has produced far more expensive speakers!

    Polk Rti-A9s, if you're doing HT and you have a good amp to go with that Denon, you'll be "happy"!


    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    cnh, it's not just that Andrew Jones built the speaker. I am hearing from some that they feel the Pioneers have a more balanced tonality. People are comparing the Pioneers to options twice their price and still giving them the upper hand. I am afraid of the harsh lower treble I've heard of. I still have a little while to decide.
  • tommyt21
    tommyt21 Posts: 685
    edited November 2012
    Crzyculyer could you please name the speakers that they compared at "twice there price range" that may help. Also your comparing speakers that are more than "twice the price range & specs). It seems a fair comparison would be polks monitor series not the freaking flagship on the RTI A series. Sorry but this speaker comparison just boggles the mind. Its like comparing a 8inch yamaha sub to a SVS PB Ultra or a entry level AVR to separates. Just plan confused:redface: Also if your coming from the B&W 600 series I seriously doubt you will be happy with those Pio's

    PS: Apples vs Oranges which is better? How about a Pioneer Kuro and a Sayno, or what about a Lexus and a Kia, or Polk Lsim's vs some RCA bookies? In essence this is just a ridiculous comparison.
    Living Room
    Fronts: RTi A7's
    Center: Csi A6 VR3 "Fortress Plus"
    Front Heights: Rti A1
    Surrounds: Rti A3
    Sub: HSU VTF-2 MK4 Damn this is a good SUB
    Pioneer Pioneer Elite: SC-35-> Emotiva XPA-3
    TV: Lg LW6500 55" Passive 3D
    Blu-Ray Panasonic BD 210
    XboX 360 Slim/Kinect

    Acoustimac red suede panels
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    Well, tommyt21, I've been told recently by an experienced listener that they would choose the Pioneers over the RTi A9s. This is why I am trying to compare them. Obviously its more than twice the price. I just wasn't sure if the consensus was that they are worth what they are priced at. If they weren't considered so, and the Pioneers were considered more than there price, then we come closer to being able to compare.
  • tommyt21
    tommyt21 Posts: 685
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    Well, tommyt21, I've been told recently by an experienced listener that they would choose the Pioneers over the RTi A9s. This is why I am trying to compare them. Obviously its more than twice the price. I just wasn't sure if the consensus was that they are worth what they are priced at. If they weren't considered so, and the Pioneers were considered more than there price, then we come closer to being able to compare.

    No offense to you, and by the way welcome to Club Polk, but that is complete BS from your experniced listener in my humble listening experince. As I said for some one that is comming from the B&W 600 series go give those Pios a listen and tell us what you think...I would definetly like to hear your feedback on that comparison
    Living Room
    Fronts: RTi A7's
    Center: Csi A6 VR3 "Fortress Plus"
    Front Heights: Rti A1
    Surrounds: Rti A3
    Sub: HSU VTF-2 MK4 Damn this is a good SUB
    Pioneer Pioneer Elite: SC-35-> Emotiva XPA-3
    TV: Lg LW6500 55" Passive 3D
    Blu-Ray Panasonic BD 210
    XboX 360 Slim/Kinect

    Acoustimac red suede panels
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,814
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler, I saw the Pioneer's available for $99.00 each. I suggest you buy a pair and judge them for yourself. If you don't like them, you're not out much at all. Personally, I fail to see how a tower speaker that weighs so little can be worth the bother.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • snake1
    snake1 Posts: 567
    edited November 2012
    I'll throw in my 0.02 since my 12s are basically the same speaker. I have personally not gotten any harsh treble out of them and my listening goes from HT, Christian rap, Rock, Classical, and Blues. Buy with confidence my friend!

    As stated above, you will need external amplification to push these. While I'm impressed at what my Onkyo has been able to do with them, I can tell they have more potential, plus the Onk has nothing else attached so as speakers are added it will only go down w/out an amp. Polk's ebay site has a few A9s for sale if I'm not mistaken and also some RTi12s in cherry as well. Food for thought. Good luck with your decision!
    AVR - Onkyo NR809
    500gb HD for MP3 and FLAC files
    Amp - Parasound 2250 - FOR SALE BTW!! PM me if interested!
    Mains - Polk RTi12 towers
    Center - CSi5
    Surround - FXiA6's
    Sub - psw505
    Movies and games - PS3
    TV - Toshiba 52" HD

    Every vehicle has one good nuetral drop in it
  • Irrenhaus
    Irrenhaus Posts: 1,094
    edited November 2012
    Hi I did have a pair for a short period of time, the SP-FS51-LR and I think they are the same but older model. They sounded okay but now they reside in the garage connected to a basic Sony stereo receiver so I can listen to some music when I am working on my truck. I think they cost me less than 200.00 for the pair and that was at Best Buy of all places.....
    HTAVR-Pioneer SC99XPA-DR3 Differential Reference AmpPolk R-700Rear- RT150Side- RT150Center-CSi5Sub-Rythmik audio F25Player- Panasonic DP-UB9000Projector- Optoma CinemaX P2Screen- Silver Ticket Products STR Series 6 120"Audio Room 2ch rig.Cary AE-3, Onkyo M-504, Marantz SA8005, Azur 851NWharfedale - Linton, SVS SB12-NSDMinis Forum PC (streamer) and Panamax MX5105Headphone rig;Schiit JOTUNHEIM and different headphones.Samsung 42" flat screen TV.
  • ken brydson
    ken brydson Posts: 8,789
    edited November 2012
    F1nut wrote: »
    crzycuyler, I saw the Pioneer's available for $99.00 each. I suggest you buy a pair and judge them for yourself. If you don't like them, you're not out much at all. Personally, I fail to see how a tower speaker that weighs so little can be worth the bother.

    This...
  • roost28
    roost28 Posts: 39
    edited November 2012
    Originally Posted by F1nut

    crzycuyler, I saw the Pioneer's available for $99.00 each. I suggest you buy a pair and judge them for yourself. If you don't like them, you're not out much at all. Personally, I fail to see how a tower speaker that weighs so little can be worth the bother.


    This...

    +1.. then you will realize that they are crap and wish you had bought the A9's
    samsung un40eh5300
    yamaha rx-a3010
    oppo bdp-105
    rtiA7, front
    csiA4, center
    rtiA1, front presence
    rtiA1, surrounds
    PSW 505, sub
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    I appreciate the advice. I wanted to grab the RTi A9s instead of the Pioneers. I just wanted to convince myself by jumping on a forum. The only two problems with the RTi A9 is the size and the need for an amp. I've got the AVR3312 and a rather small apartment. Why the A9s then? Because I can get a steal of a deal on them and don't feel like getting anything but the best of this Polk Audio series.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,814
    edited November 2012
    a rather small apartment

    Then you don't want big speakers as they need room to breath. Get yourself some monitors and a sub, they'll sound a lot better.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    I just came from B&W 685 and ASW610. I want to grab some floorstanders. I need the stability. I am comfortable placing towers off of my wall, but the bookshelves don't feel like they can command the space. RTi a5?
  • tommyt21
    tommyt21 Posts: 685
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    I just came from B&W 685 and ASW610. I want to grab some floorstanders. I need the stability. I am comfortable placing towers off of my wall, but the bookshelves don't feel like they can command the space. RTi a5?
    whats your listening preference music or HT
    HT get A5 or A3 if Music M60 or M50 your Avr should be fine with any of thos choices. I had the m60 it was great for the price point would work well for a apartment.
    Living Room
    Fronts: RTi A7's
    Center: Csi A6 VR3 "Fortress Plus"
    Front Heights: Rti A1
    Surrounds: Rti A3
    Sub: HSU VTF-2 MK4 Damn this is a good SUB
    Pioneer Pioneer Elite: SC-35-> Emotiva XPA-3
    TV: Lg LW6500 55" Passive 3D
    Blu-Ray Panasonic BD 210
    XboX 360 Slim/Kinect

    Acoustimac red suede panels
  • roost28
    roost28 Posts: 39
    edited November 2012
    seen as you are in an apartment then i would consider something smaller, a5's or someting in the tsi series.
    samsung un40eh5300
    yamaha rx-a3010
    oppo bdp-105
    rtiA7, front
    csiA4, center
    rtiA1, front presence
    rtiA1, surrounds
    PSW 505, sub
  • rpf65
    rpf65 Posts: 2,127
    edited November 2012
    When I started auditioning speakers in my price range, I stumbled onto the RTI series at Frys. I can't remember the AVR that I used, but the best sound actually came from the A7's. I had a entry level Yamaha (RX-V571), and decided to go with the A5's. Just fit my budget better, and can repurpose them when I step up the food chain. WIth a low power level, the A5's sound pretty good.

    All that said, if your in an apartment, and want really good speakers for an AVR, I suggest you put an ear on the A5's, with a fairly good sub. I think your AVR will like them a little better.
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    Would I be able to pull off the RTi A9s if I go crazy with bass traps and different methods to deal with reflections? I ask all this because I have special accommodations with Polk Audio and want to go all out if I can.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,020
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    Would I be able to pull off the RTi A9s if I go crazy with bass traps and different methods to deal with reflections? I ask all this because I have special accommodations with Polk Audio and want to go all out if I can.

    What makes you think you even need bass traps or will have problems with reflections ? Look, if the A9's are calling you in your sleep, get an amp for them to make them shine, otherwise your not going to realize their full potential. Living in an apartment, I don't see why you want big floorstanders anyway. If music is your #1 goal, some LSI 9's with a sub and an amp would be the ticket. Don't lust after the harder to drive speakers then cut short the power to drive them. That recipe will result in poor performance and an unhappy owner.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    I just considering this sick accommodation. I can upgrade my amp in the future and take advantage of a great price right now.
  • tommyt21
    tommyt21 Posts: 685
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    I just considering this sick accommodation. I can upgrade my amp in the future and take advantage of a great price right now.
    dont take this the wrong way but you do know how large those A9s are right? They dwarf alot of other floorstanders, they are very,very large
    Living Room
    Fronts: RTi A7's
    Center: Csi A6 VR3 "Fortress Plus"
    Front Heights: Rti A1
    Surrounds: Rti A3
    Sub: HSU VTF-2 MK4 Damn this is a good SUB
    Pioneer Pioneer Elite: SC-35-> Emotiva XPA-3
    TV: Lg LW6500 55" Passive 3D
    Blu-Ray Panasonic BD 210
    XboX 360 Slim/Kinect

    Acoustimac red suede panels
  • deronb1
    deronb1 Posts: 5,021
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    Would I be able to pull off the RTi A9s if I go crazy with bass traps and different methods to deal with reflections? I ask all this because I have special accommodations with Polk Audio and want to go all out if I can.
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    I just considering this sick accommodation. I can upgrade my amp in the future and take advantage of a great price right now.

    Whats the deal with accomodation(s). Not sure I understand the use of the word in your posts.
  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    tommyt21, you're right. I knew they were big, but I can't fit these speakers. Now I am looking at the RTi A5s and still comparing them to the Pioneer SP-FS52. The best subwoofer I can get through accommodations with Polk Audio is the PSW125. Should I be considering this subwoofer, or is it garbage?

    deronb1, it's a very enticing discount directly from vendor to employee instead of the store discount which exists, but still doesn't compare.
  • tommyt21
    tommyt21 Posts: 685
    edited November 2012
    crzycuyler wrote: »
    tommyt21, you're right. I knew they were big, but I can't fit these speakers. Now I am looking at the RTi A5s and still comparing them to the Pioneer SP-FS52. The best subwoofer I can get through accommodations with Polk Audio is the PSW125. Should I be considering this subwoofer, or is it garbage?

    deronb1, it's a very enticing discount directly from vendor to employee instead of the store discount which exists, but still doesn't compare.
    Depends on the price and what your looking for. The A5's may be a great choice with a good sub. For an apartment setup it sounds like a good idea. Is there any way you can hear these speakers for yourself before purchase? What people on this forum like and what you are wanting or like maybe two different things,lol.
    Living Room
    Fronts: RTi A7's
    Center: Csi A6 VR3 "Fortress Plus"
    Front Heights: Rti A1
    Surrounds: Rti A3
    Sub: HSU VTF-2 MK4 Damn this is a good SUB
    Pioneer Pioneer Elite: SC-35-> Emotiva XPA-3
    TV: Lg LW6500 55" Passive 3D
    Blu-Ray Panasonic BD 210
    XboX 360 Slim/Kinect

    Acoustimac red suede panels
  • xftman
    xftman Posts: 153
    edited November 2012
    How about A9 Vs. Energy RC70? Does anyone have experience both?
    Thanks in advance!
    MAIN:
    Front- LsiM 707 (MIT Terminator 2 Bi-Wire),
    Center- lsiM 706,
    Surrounds- lsi F/X,
    Power sub PSW1000,
    Receiver- Harman Kardon Avr 3700,
    Amp - Emo XPR-5.

    Secondary (2.1):
    LsiM 703,
    HK Avr 3700,
    Yaqin MS-30L,
    Polk DSW-PRO 400.

  • crzycuyler
    crzycuyler Posts: 16
    edited November 2012
    tommyt21, it is possible that I purchase the speakers knowing that I would return them to a store because the official purchase I would make is directly from the vendor.