PRO amp VS HI-FI AMP..test.....

naturallight
naturallight Posts: 689
edited August 2012 in 2 Channel Audio
Now the only reason i'm doing this..I have no money for up grades and i need to sell some stuff. But before i do..may be an interesting test. I have a QSC GX5...500 watts per. Brand new only used a couple of hours. I bought it to run some speakers which i hated..and dumped the whole project. But i still have the amp.

I have my RTi 12's which are great..run them with a an Onkyo M-504 amp..works great...massive bass...pretty much play them at 10-11 oclock on most cd's thats about all you can do as it gets too loud.

So..hey..lets test. The problem would be..if i play heavy rock stuff such as Chicken foot.....probably you could not tell. So I have to pick some CD's that are not nuts..so....CSN, Bruce Hornsby, SteelyDan stuff..maybe.
Something like that..the problem is the QSC has that fan noise..so if the volume gets too low...you hear that.

Now if this dosen't sound like junk..may try some classical music on it.

Anybody have some idea's on this test?
I'm going to turn the QSC volume controls up all the way and let the Adcom Pre..handle the volume.

Now the QSC is not a cheap amp by any means..it has gold plated RCA's and gold plated speaker connects. It is not a light amp, it's 28 lbs. The specs are of course not what a "HI-FI" amp would be..but there not that far off...
Pretty much the deal...it has massive power..with massive headroom....and far more then the 12's can take...LOL

Anybody have some idea of how to test this, other then what i stated. Maybe different music or something.
Or any general coments about the test???
Post edited by naturallight on
«1

Comments

  • Conradicles
    Conradicles Posts: 6,081
    edited August 2012
    My only advice would be to trust your ears. If you like it don't worry about the folks who will flame you.:biggrin:
  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,603
    edited August 2012
    Sorta touchy subject with some. I agree, trust your ears. If you like the sound that is all that matters. I have an M504 as well and love it. You should add Donald Fagan-Kamakiriad to that line up I think! :cheesygrin:
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • nhhiep
    nhhiep Posts: 877
    edited August 2012
    from what I saw, Pro amps have much higher THD. 500W only weights 28lbs? that is pretty light actually :) My mid-fi HK amp weight around 50lbs and only rated at 100 WPC x4.
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    Well it was really just a test.....not to get anybody upset about it. I have the amp..before i sell it..thought it might be interesting. Then of course what i say about it..is just MY opinon anyway. If it's bugs people...I will say no more about it.
  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited August 2012
    nhhiep wrote: »
    from what I saw, Pro amps have much higher THD. 500W only weights 28lbs? that is pretty light actually :) My mid-fi HK amp weight around 50lbs and only rated at 100 WPC x4.
    I don't understand how some use weight as a standard as which to compare amps. Class A needs the most heatsinks, A/B needs less, and D needs barely any, making it silly to use weight as a factor.
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • nhhiep
    nhhiep Posts: 877
    edited August 2012
    Face wrote: »
    I don't understand how some use weight as a standard as which to compare amps. Class A needs the most heatsinks, A/B needs less, and D needs barely any, making it silly to use weight as a factor.

    yes, I agree with you on that. of course, w/o saying, we were talking about the same class here.
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited August 2012
    I've used some pro amps. They don't sound as good but provide excellent dynamics due to the power. For quite some time I was happy with the results. Give it a try and decide where you are today.
    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited August 2012
    I've used some pro amps. They don't sound as good but provide excellent dynamics due to the power. For quite some time I was happy with the results. Give it a try and decide where you are today.
    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • onebadchad
    onebadchad Posts: 364
    edited August 2012
    yupp. weight means nothing, my 4 lb carver m-400 will outperform my 65 lb peavey 1.3k any day of the week
    Hello Kitty am/fm CD player
  • mhardy6647
    mhardy6647 Posts: 33,804
    edited August 2012
    this commercial amp, e.g., actually sounds pretty decent - push-pull parallel EL84 outputs for probably 30 or so watts per channel...

    P1020121.jpg
    PeaveyClassic5050topless.jpg

    The best advice for a Carver m400... keep a fire extinguisher handy. Like many of Bob's earlier products, they have a propensity for self-immolation.
  • onebadchad
    onebadchad Posts: 364
    edited August 2012
    Just making a point, the carver just holds the dust off the shelf.
    Hello Kitty am/fm CD player
  • Mother Mooch
    Mother Mooch Posts: 129
    edited August 2012
    Let me say this... I have had a LOT of people piss at me for buying a "Pro" amp!!!, Garbage in garbage out, It's that easy, Speaker this, speaker that, you adjust the sound to what you want! cheers and remember to smile :)


    I traded my Polk Monitor 12's for a QSC GX7 amp and a set of Peavey 215's! Yes i miss the 12's for sound duplication, But when the chicks are screaming for more! I got it now :)


    Now everything rattles <shrugs shoulders>
    No clue where the distortion comes from! But got nice butts dancing ALL around lol :)
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    LMAO...well i have nothing to say to that except..rock on and get chicks to dance...LOL
  • halo71
    halo71 Posts: 4,603
    edited August 2012
    ^ well? Test results?
    --Gary--
    Onkyo Integra M504, Bottlehead Foreplay III, Denon SACD, Thiel CS2.3, NHT VT-2, VT-3 and Evolution T6, Infinity RSIIIa, SDA1C and a few dozen other speakers around the house I change in and out.
  • Joe08867
    Joe08867 Posts: 3,919
    edited August 2012
    I use a pro amp for my subs "QSC RMX 2450" but that is about it. It is also in a closet cause the fan noise can drive you up a wall. Like being on the Starship Enterprise just a constant hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
  • DaveHo
    DaveHo Posts: 3,528
    edited August 2012
    So how'd this turn out? If you're still looking for test music suggestions these are my usual suspects.

    Roger Waters - Radio K.A.O.S. Track 4 is an especially good dynamics test.
    Dire Straits - BIA: Use the SACD if you've got it!
    Mariah Carey - Music Box
    Pink Floyd - The Wall: Not a super recording, but I love Mother. A system with good synergy can really pull you in on this one.
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    I didn't do anything. Didn't think anybody was real interested, but since a few of you want to know, i'll try it this weekend.
    The problem is going to be with the fan noise. Now i have an "isomat" that i use in a recording room. I was thinking about just drapeing it over the front of the rack. It's not going to stop airflow to the unit, but may defuse some of the noise.

    I was thinking of trying the first cut off electric ladyland, as it tends to throw stuff all over the room, and has all kinds of wierd dynamics going on. Maybe a few other cuts off that, then jumping to Steely Dan. I'd try some classical, but depends on the fan noise.
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited August 2012
    Pro amp= Diesel engine
    Hi-fi amp= Gas engine

    One is a workhorse that will do alot of heavy lifting, the other is all about fidelity and refinement. Pick your poison.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited August 2012
    , but depends on the fan noise.

    That right there tells the entire story.

    Pro-amps stink for serious hi-fidelity. They simply stink.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,965
    edited August 2012
    heiney9 wrote: »
    They simply stink.H9

    Now, there ya go again....beating around the bush. Just say what you mean bro. :cheesygrin:
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,165
    edited August 2012
    I did qualify it by saying "for hi-fidelity". I know some people are perfectly happy using them, but then 99% of those people have never heard a real nice amplifier. ANd some people simply don't care. If someone takes the time to inquire about it, I'm going to give my opinion, not what one wants to hear :cool:

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
  • erniejade
    erniejade Posts: 6,321
    edited August 2012
    I ran a qsc plx 3602 on my carver amazing original for a little while with good results. Then I got a sunfire sig II with better results. Honeslty if i didnt buy the sunfire, I would not have known what I was missing. Remember sound is all personal to your tastes. That said, and people might not like this one, the qsc plx 3602 to me sounded like an adcom 555 on steroids. It had a lot of the same qualities as the adcom did when I did a test between the adcom 555 and the qsc on sda 2.3's and jbl L150. During quiet passages, I could hear a little fan noise but, only if the air condition or heat was off. When they were on, i couldnt hear the built in fans.

    Is it true Hi Fi? nope but, it doesnt mean you cant get something that sounds good to you.

    THe qsc Gx series is the cheaper line from qsc. Budget minded. At one of the bars I DJ at they are running a gx5 on some 20 year old jbl pro speakers. that amp can take a lot of abuse lol I know this one first hand.
    Klipsch The Nines, Audioquest Thunderbird Interconnect, Innuos Zen MK3 W4S recovery, Revolution Audio Labs USB & Ethernet, Border Patrol SE-I, Audioquest Niagara 5000 & Thunder, Cullen Crossover II PC's.
  • Erik Tracy
    Erik Tracy Posts: 4,673
    edited August 2012
    I think there is an automotive store someplace that was 'expertly' installed (search this site) with a pro-audio setup - you may want to see if you can go for an audition. :cheesygrin:

    H9: If you don't trust what you are hearing, then maybe you need to be less invested in a hobby which all the pleasure comes from listening to music.
  • markmarc
    markmarc Posts: 2,309
    edited August 2012
    In late 2005 I was looking for a cheap way to get loads of power I checked into pro amps. After several days of listening I came to the conclusion that pro amps are akin to taking a sledgehammer to a finishing nail to wood trim. The nail will go in but you end up with a big dent.
    Review Site_ (((AudioPursuit)))
    Founder/Publisher Affordable$$Audio 2006-13.
    Former Staff Member TONEAudio
    2 Ch. System
    Amplifiers: Parasound Halo P6 pre, Vista Audio i34, Peachtree amp500, Adcom GFP-565 GFA-535ii, 545ii, 555ii
    Digital: SimAudio HAD230 DAC, iMac 20in/Amarra,
    Speakers: Paradigm Performa F75, Magnepan .7, Totem Model 1's, ACI Emerald XL, Celestion Si Stands. Totem Dreamcatcher sub
    Analog: Technics SL-J2 w/Pickering 3000D, SimAudio LP5.3 phono pre
    Cable/Wires: Cardas, AudioArt, Shunyata Venom 3
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    Guys, Guys.... I said this was a fun test..the amp is just sitting there..before i sell it. It's pretty much unused and bought for another project...NOT to run stereo speakers...LOL
    Now i don't hold any high expectations for this...not sure i could even make it thru 3 songs, but at least let me plug it in before we throw it under the bus, sort of speak...LOL
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited August 2012
    A good pro amp application might be for subwoofer use, but again fan noise may be an issue.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    OK..I tried the test. Now again, let me state..this is only MY opinion on this...Nothing more..before people have a cow about it.

    This is a QSC GX5 amp..it has 500watts per at 8 ohms..with at least another 100 left for headroom. Pretty much more the the 12's can handle. I'm feeding it with a Jolida cd, into an Adcom pre..that's it. I set the QSC volume pretty much all the way up. Let the Adcom handle the volume. This amp is NOT light by the way..it's pretty much close to 28 LB's if that make a difference to anyone.



    Now my first thought was this was going to be way to bright for the 12's..but that was not the case...it's not a bright amp.

    Now if you want to have a disco room in your basement..buy the 12/9's plug this amp in your good to go. This amp will push the 12/9's to stupid volumes...it will beat you with bass...you can dance all night, and pretty much be deaf the next day. Not that i really care about that...but can be had...I pushed the 12's in the 17x30 foot room.(just to see)..I'm sitting 15 feet back. It will pretty much make you deaf, and the bass (depending on what your playing) can be like a shotgun to your chest.



    OK..now back to normal stuff. Dose this amp effect the sound stage of the 12's....no not really. It gives you the same sound stage..stuff flies all over the place on the first cut of Electric Ladyland. Is it accurate?...well sad to say yes..it's dam accurate..you hear every dam thing in the recording...not like your missing something...all backround noise..everything.

    Now I listened to a bunch of cuts..Chickenfoot, Hendrix, CSN, even 1 classical cut. Is it BAD..well....no. Have i heard worse amps..YES. Pretty much if you try and run 9's with almost any receiver....it's just underpowered, pretty much clipping if you try and turn it up, and your lacking bass, that the 12/9's can give. So in that case, i would say why not use this amp.



    Could you use this amp in an HT setup..well if your running it thru some proccesor thing to get surround sound, and feeding it "processed" stuff...with 9's as your front. May work. It will for sure pound the bass, and should have no problem with dialog.



    Would i use this amp for a strait 2 channel system.....NO It has massive power, and is dam accurate, but the sound is very clinical,, Sterile sort of speak. There is nothing warm or musical about the amp. Not something i want to sit and listen for 3 hours of music.



    Thats basically what i can tell you about the amp. It's not crap..but it depends on what you want to do with it.
  • Mother Mooch
    Mother Mooch Posts: 129
    edited August 2012
    Fan noise? My last worry! Got my Polk monitor 12's back! Fan noise is not problem!!!! don't hear a fan ??? The old saying goes! Garbage in garbage out!!!! I really don't care what amp you got!


    Matched with a 100 watt sub... Sub's got more bass than the than the 12's! Sorrrrrrrrrryyyyyyy!!!!!!
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    Well the speakers i was testing this amp with are RTi12's which are pretty much RTi9's without the wood trim. NOT Monitor 12's. 2 completely different speakers. If you run the RTi12's with any high power, high current amp...for 2 channel stereo, a 100watt sub is pretty much useless. You would probably blow up the sub just trying to compete with the RTi12's. You'd need a high dollor, high power sub, to make any difference.
  • naturallight
    naturallight Posts: 689
    edited August 2012
    Now, i'm surprised people didn't jump on this test/review. But then again I was surprised at the outcome.

    BUT, this amp was designed to probably be a very clinical, accurate amp, with massive power, nothing more.

    That it dose in spades. I bought it for a PA project, but ran out of money and shelved the whole thing. So i just had this amp sitting there doing nothing.



    Could you use this amp as a main for a set of 9's in an HT setup. Well I know nothing about HT. But from what i understand, these AVR units, pretty much..you pick out the "surround" sound you want...Like what cinema, or hall effect type thing. SO..from what i understand, your sending the amp a "processed" signal. So in that case, the fact that it is a "sterile" amp. Pretty much goes by the wayside, as this amp will just give you what the AVR is telling it to.



    Now these Emo, AVR amps...some people on here really dislike them...Is this amp any better? Don't know , have never heard one of the Emo amps. But i'd be willing to bet, it's just as good or better.



    Again, would i trade my Onkyo M 504 for this..For strait up 2 channel music..not on your life. It's not a warm or musical amp. BUT..for an HT setup...maybe, and as a sub power plant..any day of the week.