Integrated 2 Channel Amp to power Polk RTI A7s
pkdowning
Posts: 35
I have another thread in the digital forum that originally started out discussing DACs, but got redirected into discussing integrated amps. Rather than continue that thread I thought I would start a new thread in the more appropriate thread of 2 channel audio.
I recently bought a pair of Polk RTI A7s in anticipation for implementing a listening room in my home (roughly 20' x 15'). The A7s will be solely used for music listening and in a 2 channel fashion. I currently have an Onkyo 606 receiver rated at 90 watts/ch that I was planninng on using to power the A7s. However, after joining this forum and starting to look around, I quickly found out that I could get a lot more out of my speakers and enjoy my music more with a better source. Thus, I am looking for an integrated stereo amp.
So far I have found the following amps that seem to get pretty good reviews:
NAD C356BEE
Cambridge Audio 651A
Outlaw RR2150
Music Hall A15.2 (I liked the price point of the Music Hall but would like speaker A and speaker B output).
Would any of these amps be a good pairing with the A7s? Are there any others I should consider? I would also be interested in used equipment as well if there is anything out there.
Thanks in advance.
I recently bought a pair of Polk RTI A7s in anticipation for implementing a listening room in my home (roughly 20' x 15'). The A7s will be solely used for music listening and in a 2 channel fashion. I currently have an Onkyo 606 receiver rated at 90 watts/ch that I was planninng on using to power the A7s. However, after joining this forum and starting to look around, I quickly found out that I could get a lot more out of my speakers and enjoy my music more with a better source. Thus, I am looking for an integrated stereo amp.
So far I have found the following amps that seem to get pretty good reviews:
NAD C356BEE
Cambridge Audio 651A
Outlaw RR2150
Music Hall A15.2 (I liked the price point of the Music Hall but would like speaker A and speaker B output).
Would any of these amps be a good pairing with the A7s? Are there any others I should consider? I would also be interested in used equipment as well if there is anything out there.
Thanks in advance.
Post edited by pkdowning on
Comments
-
I like my A15.2, i too wish it had A&B outputs but it is a strong amp for the price point. If you are wanting to do any Vinyl the Music Hall is good too as it comes with a phono amp as well.Main 2ch -
BlueSound Node->Ethereal optical cable->Peachtree Audio Nova 150->GoldenEar Triton 2+
TT - Pro-ject Classic SB with Sumiko Bluepoint.
TV 3.1 system -
Denon 3500 -> Dynaudio Excite 32/22 -
Have you considered a tube integrated? Maybe one of the Jolida's.Political Correctness'.........defined
"A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."
President of Club Polk -
I have always been curious about a tube amp, however would like to stay within a certain budget around $500 new/used.
-
Also look at the Harman/Kardon HK3490. Its amplifier section is good - not sure about its phono section.
-
Does the NAD have better synergy than the Cambridge?
-
From the integrates amps I am looking at, the wattage ranges from 50-100 watts. Is that enough to power the A7s? I was at a local hi-fi shop the other day and they mentioned that wattage doesn't necessarily matter. Is there any truth to that?
-
True, but as in most things, it depends! What models are you looking at?
-
Music Hall A15.2
Outlaw RR2150
Harmon Kardon 3490
NAD C 356BEE
Cambridge audio 650/651A
Marantz PM6004 -
Here is a cool little tube integrated amp from Grant Fidelity: http://shop.grantfidelity.com/Shuguang-I-25-Integrated-Mini-Amp-w-MP3-port.html
-
All good choices, imo. No bad apples in that bunch! Have you listened to all of them?
-
Here is a cool little tube integrated amp from Grant Fidelity: http://shop.grantfidelity.com/Shuguang-I-25-Integrated-Mini-Amp-w-MP3-port.html
-
NAD C372. Look for one on the used market for a great deal.
-
mdaudioguy wrote: »All good choices, imo. No bad apples in that bunch! Have you listened to all of them?
I actually haven't listened to any of them and am solely going off of recommendations in this as well as other forums. I understand the A7s can be a little bright and its a good idea to pair them with a "warmer" amp. Is that correct? -
Conradicles wrote: »NAD C372. Look for one on the used market for a great deal.
Would the NAD C372 be better or up to par with the NAD 375BEE? -
Would the NAD C372 be better or up to par with the NAD 375BEE?
Check out this puppy....
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?134970-Rotel-RA-1312-Integrated-Amplifier-200"....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963) -
Would the NAD C372 be better or up to par with the NAD 375BEE?
I do not think there would be a significant sonic difference between these two amps. I owned the 355 and thought it was a very good amp. I had it paired with polk lsi9s and thought it was a great combination.Rig1 - Totem Hawks, Benchmark HDR, Parasound A21, Sonus, Samsung 52 LCD, Audioquest Type4
Rig2 - LFD LE IV Integrated, Harbeth P3ESR, Rega Dac, MF V-Link, IMAC, Audioquest Type4