Am I Crazy? Going back in time... TSi series to RT Series

jemrey81
jemrey81 Posts: 161
edited May 2012 in Speakers
So I currently use a CS10 for my center and a pair of TSi100's for my fronts and a psw505 sub... no rears (3.1 system).

I just bought some RT16's from a garage sale and am now picking up a CS400 this weekend to match the RT's.... this setup will actually end up costing a lot less then the set up above. am I crazy doing this? am I going backwards? I feel like it should have better sound quality in the end, but I am starting to have a hard time getting rid of the CS10 and TSi100's. I know once I get the CS400 home I will know if I am making the right decision, but I don't want to be making the wrong decision and not find out until later... if that makes sense.

Everything I have read says that the CS400 is an amazing center channel and that the RT16's are great too.... but most of that info is from years ago.

Any thoughts on keeping the TSi 100's and trying to use them for rears? My living room layout is not an easy one for rears, but I might be able to figure something out...
Post edited by jemrey81 on
«1

Comments

  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited May 2012
    You're not crazy. The RT-16's were, and still are, an excellent speaker. Those 16's and 400 should sound better than your TSI's and 10.

    As for the surrounds, I'd try to find a pair of the original LS/FX's that were made to match the RT's, but in the interim you could certainly use the 100's.


    Get the 400 home, and then see what sounds better to your ears.



    Cheers, and congrats. Those 16's are sweet.!:cheesygrin:
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited May 2012
    All that matters is how it sounds to YOUR ears. If you like the older setup better than that is what is right for you.
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited May 2012
    and it's not really even a fair comparison.. the rt-16's retailed for close to a grand, and that was 15 some odd years ago.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • nhhiep
    nhhiep Posts: 877
    edited May 2012
    for HT, I am not surprised with your move at all. Did you know what RT stands for Reference Theater?
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited May 2012
    No, you're not going "crazy"...remember, TSI-100s are Polks "entry" level speaker today. The RT-16s were "far" from "entry" level in their day. Besides the 100s are merely a 10+ pound two way bookshelf vs. a 56 pound three driver floorstanding speaker--not a fair comparison. You're good!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 28,782
    edited May 2012
    If the RT16 didnt wipe the floor with the TSi400 I would be a little upset...
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
  • drselect
    drselect Posts: 664
    edited May 2012
    If you are looking for some rear speakers might want to check into these LS/FX
    http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?132119-LS-FX-INFINITY-EMIT-R-s-RT-FX-parts-XLO.........
    (not affiliated)
    I am running the RT16 with a cs350sl and LS/FX for rears in my HT.
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    Thanks for all of the feedback guys!! it really makes me feel a little more comfortable :)

    drselect - thanks for the link! I just scoped out my living room area trying my hardest to find a spot to either wall mount or put some rears on stands and I just can't work them into the room :(


    While I was looking around, I noticed that the CS400 won't fit where my CS10 is currently at..... is there any reason I shouldn't place my tv directly on top of the CS400? The base of my LCD is just a pinch smaller than the CS400, so I know it will fit on there just fine - I am just unsure as to if this will affect the sound or the picture quality in any way. I can put some rubber pads on the bottom of the CS400 and on the bottom of the tv base so there is some "cushion". What are your thoughts on this?
  • ravaneli
    ravaneli Posts: 530
    edited May 2012
    no, you Are crazy!
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I have found that tube based computers provide the best sound quality. ENIAC and MANIAC I offer a smooth, well defined and articulated sound unmatched by the current silicon based CPUs. :wink:
    But as in all things your perception is your reality.
  • rooftop59
    rooftop59 Posts: 8,121
    edited May 2012
    Depends on how heavy the tv is. My older LCD is kinda heavy, but a lot of the newer ones are super light. I certainly wouldn't place a 50+ lb tv on it. But it's a big speaker with dual rear firing ports that benefits from having room to breathe, so if setting it under the tv gets it out of a smaller space it actually might some better.
    Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es
    Game Room 5.1.4:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra

    Bedroom 2.1
    Harmon Kardon HK3490; Bluesounds Node N130; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer
  • rooftop59
    rooftop59 Posts: 8,121
    edited May 2012
    And seriously, the tsis look cooler, but other than that your new older speakers are superior in every way.
    Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es
    Game Room 5.1.4:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra

    Bedroom 2.1
    Harmon Kardon HK3490; Bluesounds Node N130; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,008
    edited May 2012
    Don't put the tv on the speaker, you can make a small stand to fit over the speaker with basic wood and hardware from Home depot. We have a thread somewhere on center speaker stands, do a search and take a look see.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    Thanks guys... the TV is closer to the 30 pound range, but I will do a search on the topic and see what I can find about center channel stands (sucks the one I have won't work).
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited May 2012
    Seriously. Even "I" could fashion a center shelf, 3 pieces of wood, some stain and braces? And I got a D in wood shop one semester. Of course that did not effect my 4.0 GPA because it didn't count! I was just "bored" with shop classes. But most guys here got the As there!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    I'll see what I can do... I don't own any wood working tools, but I know some guys that do ;)
  • Slinger182
    Slinger182 Posts: 512
    edited May 2012
    Get something like this.

    http://www.amazon.com/Wood-Technology-Adjustable-Component-TVRISER-2/dp/B004B39OEA/ref=sr_1_9?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1336670010&sr=1-9

    I've definitely seen them around for a lot cheaper than that one though.
    Panny 55-st30 plasma
    Pioneer vsx-1121
    Parasound 2100 pre
    b&k tx4430 amp
    Oppo bdp-83
    Monster HTS 3500
    polk TSi500s Vr3 Fortress modded
    polk CS20 center channel Vr3 Castle modded
    polk Owm 3 surrounds
    polk PSW505
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,538
    edited May 2012
    cfrizz wrote: »
    All that matters is how it sounds to YOUR ears. If you like the older setup better than that is what is right for you.

    +10. perception IS reality.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Shop Spkrs: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • ravaneli
    ravaneli Posts: 530
    edited May 2012
    I still insist that your are crazy!
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I have found that tube based computers provide the best sound quality. ENIAC and MANIAC I offer a smooth, well defined and articulated sound unmatched by the current silicon based CPUs. :wink:
    But as in all things your perception is your reality.
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    ravaneli wrote: »
    I still insist that your are crazy!

    Well, then let's hear your side.... I don't mind :)
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited May 2012
    jemrey81 wrote: »
    ...I noticed that the CS400 won't fit where my CS10 is currently at...

    Have you bought the cs400 yet??? If not, you should seriously consider the the cs-350ls, like drselect mentioned above, if it will fit.

    It's shorter than the cs400, but wider. It measures 25 x 11 x 6.5.

    It's a great center, and it matches those rt16's perfectly.


    I might even have an extra one laying around...:wink:
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • ravaneli
    ravaneli Posts: 530
    edited May 2012
    jemrey81 wrote: »
    Well, then let's hear your side.... I don't mind :)

    oh, no, you are right about the speakers; i just got that feeling when I read your post : )
    BlueFox wrote: »
    I have found that tube based computers provide the best sound quality. ENIAC and MANIAC I offer a smooth, well defined and articulated sound unmatched by the current silicon based CPUs. :wink:
    But as in all things your perception is your reality.
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    ravaneli wrote: »
    oh, no, you are right about the speakers; i just got that feeling when I read your post : )

    Touche ;)
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    Have you bought the cs400 yet??? If not, you should seriously consider the the cs-350ls, like drselect mentioned above, if it will fit.

    It's shorter than the cs400, but wider. It measures 25 x 11 x 6.5.

    It's a great center, and it matches those rt16's perfectly.


    I might even have an extra one laying around...:wink:

    Keep talkin Falcon.... I was under the impression that the CS400 was the matching center - is that incorrect? I haven't purchased the CS400 yet. Is that your CS350ls on ebay?
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,008
    edited May 2012
    The cs400 will match fine, and in my opinion is a step up from the 350. Not that the 350 is bad, just that I always liked the 400 better. Just my opinion on it is all. Either one will work out fine for ya. Incidently, a good thumbs up on going the route you are over the tsi's. Not a big fan of that series if you can tell. Keep trying new things, you'll discover a world of sound available to you that many never care to seek out.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited May 2012
    They both match. I've never heard the 400. Some who have heard both like the 350 better, some like the 400 better. My 350 is not listed anywhere.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    Thanks Tony and Falcon! I will keep an eye out for the CS350LS, but I doubt I will find one locally before Saturday when I will be checking out the CS400. If you have one and want to send it to a good home you can pm me with the details ;-)

    For what it's worth, I would have to change my current TV riser with either one.... so that's not really a deciding factor.
  • jemrey81
    jemrey81 Posts: 161
    edited May 2012
    Ugh.... sad news. I did some more testing with the RT16's and another one of the woofers is going bad - scratchy at lower volume.

    I returned them to the previous owner - he told me when I bought them that if there was any issue with them to return them to him.... he hasn't had them plugged in for a few years.

    I really appreciate all your help and advise, and I am SUPER bummed that I had to return them..... But I bought other speakers - to be cont. in another thread :)
  • ctransj
    ctransj Posts: 29
    edited May 2012
    I still have an extra woofer that I bought the whole set from member here.
    let me know if you need one but I need to find it first.
    I have two pairs of RT16 and I am still struggling why I spent money on the new Lsi15.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 33,008
    edited May 2012
    ctransj wrote: »
    I have two pairs of RT16 and I am still struggling why I spent money on the new Lsi15.

    The RT16 and the LSI 15 are in two different classes. If your not tickled pink with the 15's over the RT's, then we have to ask what gear your driving them with.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • falconcry72
    falconcry72 Posts: 3,580
    edited May 2012
    tonyb wrote: »
    The RT16 and the LSI 15 are in two different classes. If your not tickled pink with the 15's over the RT's, then we have to ask what gear your driving them with.

    Owned both, and I agree 100%.
    2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's

    Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses

    Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's