DB vs DXi
falconcry72
Posts: 3,580
I used to be into car audio, but I've been out of the game for about 10 years.
I'm looking to outfit a friend's car with some Polks. She's gonna need (2) 5 1/4's and (2) 6 1/2's.
What's the sound quality difference between the DXi's and the DB's? They seemed comparably priced and spec'd. They obviously look a lot different...
Thanks, dudes!
I'm looking to outfit a friend's car with some Polks. She's gonna need (2) 5 1/4's and (2) 6 1/2's.
What's the sound quality difference between the DXi's and the DB's? They seemed comparably priced and spec'd. They obviously look a lot different...
Thanks, dudes!
2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's
Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's
Post edited by falconcry72 on
Comments
-
Not a significant difference in my opinion between them. Now if you consider the MM line, they are much better.Audison Bit Ten
Kenwood X595
Polk MM6501
Polk MM1240
Mtx 704x
Alpine MRX50 -
Shouldn't the lower impedance pull more power from the HU ?Audison Bit Ten
Kenwood X595
Polk MM6501
Polk MM1240
Mtx 704x
Alpine MRX50 -
I guess the issue is if the tiny amp in the hu can handle the lower impedance. Given that, I'm not sure I'd go strictly by the 2.7 Ohm rating on the MM. It's basically a 4ohm speaker rated at 2.7 at a particular frequency. I think there would not be any issues in hooking it up to hu power.