7 Channel AMP for LSi setup
MrDHEJ
Posts: 137
So looks like I'm going to upgrade sooner then later. What would be a good amp to drive a 7 channel LSi system?
I looked at the NAD T955 and T975 amps, and for some reason there is a $2000 price differance, for just two more channels... Would like to keep the price to around 2k.
I looked at the NAD T955 and T975 amps, and for some reason there is a $2000 price differance, for just two more channels... Would like to keep the price to around 2k.
Post edited by MrDHEJ on
Comments
-
the 975 has more power - especially the dynamic power at 4 ohms, not just 2 more channels. Read the data sheets carefully.
I have the M25 and have heard the T955. I think the 975 would be plenty.ALL BOXED UP for a while until I save up for a new place
Home Theater:
KEF Q900s / MIT Shotgun S3 / MIT CVT2 ICs | KEF Q600C | Polk FXi5 | BJC Wire | Signal / AQ ICs | Shunyata / Pangea PCs | Pioneer Elite SC 57 | Parasound NC2100 Pre | NAD M25 | Marantz SA8001 | Schiit Gungnir DAC | SB Touch
2 Channel:
Polk LSi9 (xo mods), Polk DSW MicroPro 2000 sub | NAD c375BEE | W4S DAC1 | SB Touch | Marantz SA-8001 | MIT AVt 2 | Kimber Hero / AQ / Signal ICs | Shunyata / Signal PCs -
Not trying to discourage you from the NAD, but I just saw this deal at AA and thought I would pass it along.
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=1PAC5250
It is only 5 channels but if your receiver is powerful it might be able to push rear channel lsis as long as they are modest (like lsi7s).MAIN: Polk Lsi9s; Polk PSW505; Lsic (in box); Onkyo SR-875; Parasound 2250; Cambridge Audio 740C; LG BD370
OFFICE: Polk Lsi7; REL T3; HK 3490; CA 840W; Onkyo C-S5VL
BENCHED: CS20; OWM3s -
This is what I use in my HT: http://www.wyred4sound.com/webapps/p/74030/117839/339145"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
-
Not trying to discourage you from the NAD, but I just saw this deal at AA and thought I would pass it along.
http://www.audioadvisor.com/prodinfo.asp?number=1PAC5250
It is only 5 channels but if your receiver is powerful it might be able to push rear channel lsis as long as they are modest (like lsi7s). -
-
6 grand is a tad much. I was also looking at the outlaw brand of amps, from what i read the founder used to be with nad?
My reciever has plenty to push a pair of LSi9's. As it is now, it's pushing LSi15's, LSiFX's, and LSiC. 15's are bi ampd, was waiting to run the LSi9's in the rear till i got an amp.
Would it sound ok to run just the rears on the reciever with an amp running the front 5? I have little to no experience with that kind of setup. That parasound would definitly have more juice, espically only running 5 speakers vs 7.
Hows the parasound sound compared to the nad? -
Can't knock the nad. But i do love my Parasound. For that price its hard to beat. It states its like new with a warranty.
-
A 5 channel amp would do wonders for you, letting the receiver handle 2 surrounds should be ok. I sure hope your keeping the volume respectable running all those LSI's off that receiver. Your taxing that puppy fairly well.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
I want to expand alittle so as not to start another war. A few things, while some manufactures rate their AVR's as being 4 ohm compatable, you have to read specs carefully because they vary in meaning. Usually they rate a receiver into 4 ohms with 2 channels driven, not 7. Also, what they do on some is limit the current in 4 ohm to keep the receiver from overheating. A speaker rated at 4 ohm lives and dies on current, see the problem ? Granted, not all do this, but alot of them do, so read specs carefully.
Another thing I want to point out, is the 809 in 7 channel mode is good for 78 watts, still beefy by midline standards. I know I always point out the 7 channel specs here on the forum, but now I will point out why. Lets throw watts out the window for a minute because it really has less to do with anything. All channel driven specs are mostly done with sine waves, who listens to sine waves ? What it does give you however, is an insight to something more important than watts.....reserve power. Why is reserve power important ? For those dynamic passages in your music/movies that calles upon the receiver to belly up at an instant. When you see a big discrepancy between 2 channels driven and all channels driven, thats a clue that not alot of reserve power is on tap with 5 or 7 channels added. Also, lets be real here because specs are misleading. A receiver doesn't put out all that power at once either into 7 channels. It's very rare that at any given time, all 7 channels will need optimal output. The only scenario I can think of is using all channel stereo and cranking on the volume dial. Now with movies, there is a kicker, all channels are never needing all that power at once, but and it's a big but, if you have low power reserve and your playing a pretty dynamic movie say in Blu-ray, are you quick enough to turn that volume down when the soundtrack demands all channels on deck at full bore ? Granted, it doesn't happen often, but when it does it only takes the snap of a finger to clip.
Like in the other thread on Poly switches, a seperate amp gives you the reserve power needed, especially on 4 ohm speakers to not only give you better sound quality, but to protect your gear, your speakers, and some peace of mind. Of coarse the usual caveots apply, your gear/speakers, listening habits, everything works hand in hand. Start thinking reserve power instead of watts when looking to power multiple speakers and you should do fine.
Just bringing this up because I see a few still driving LSI's from midline receivers and only wish to help some protect their investment. This hobby of ours doesn't get any cheaper, the rabbit hole runs deep. Good luck to the OP on getting an amp and enjoy the tunes.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
A 5 channel amp would do wonders for you, letting the receiver handle 2 surrounds should be ok. I sure hope your keeping the volume respectable running all those LSI's off that receiver. Your taxing that puppy fairly well.
I'm still leaning towards a 7 channel amp, but haven’t tossed out the idea of a 5 channel with the rears off the receiver. Found lots of rave reviews for that parasound 5250. Lots of rave reviews for the nad 975 as well though.
I haven’t pushed the 809 anywhere near max, though I don't currently need to with my entertainment room being small; I'm only 7' from the main speakers. Though the receiver isn't getting hot, and the fans haven’t even come on. I know all will be better off with a dedicated amp; it's just decideing on what one to get.
I haven’t been able to find out if the Onkyo TX-NR809 has current limiting, but it does let you set the speakers to 4ohm, so it may. I was reluctant to even say I was driving those LSi's with that receiver. I've seen some perty big flames from other members in regards to driving LSi's with anything other than a dedicated amp. But worry not, last thing I want to do is hurt either piece of equipment, you just have to respect the throttle.
So now I'm leaning towards the parasound. I'm guessing the receiver can handle a pair of LSi9's in the rear? If the receiver can handle those in the rear, would the sound be irregular being driven from two different power sources? -
You can always add another amp if the sound displeases you.
-
The 9''s are harder to drive and can dip into the 2 ohm area but as a surround speaker I don't see that happening. Kind of a waste for that speaker in a surround position, have you thought about FXI6's as surrounds ? Better dispersion of the surround field and easier to drive. Just a thought.
BTW, that Parasound sounds nice and should work well.HT SYSTEM-
Sony 850c 4k
Pioneer elite vhx 21
Sony 4k BRP
SVS SB-2000
Polk Sig. 20's
Polk FX500 surrounds
Cables-
Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable
Kitchen
Sonos zp90
Grant Fidelity tube dac
B&k 1420
lsi 9's -
The 9''s are harder to drive and can dip into the 2 ohm area but as a surround speaker I don't see that happening. Kind of a waste for that speaker in a surround position, have you thought about FXI6's as surrounds ? Better dispersion of the surround field and easier to drive. Just a thought.
I would give the W4S linked above a second look though.
http://www.hometheatershack.com/forums/amplifier-reviews/43865-wyred-4-sound-mini-mc-7-channel-amplifier-review.html
http://hometheaterreview.com/wyred-4-sound-mini-mc5-multi-channel-amplifier-reviewed/"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche -
another vote for the Parasound 5250 at that price!
and for TonyB's statement on AVR power--pretty much nails my experience with LSI's and my OnkOnkyo TX-SR804 receiver
Parasound 5250
LSI 15's
LSI C
LSI FX's
PSW1000 Sub
OPPO 93
Sony CDP-C315 CD
Monster AC line cond
Audioquest, Blue Jeans & Monster wires/connects
40" Sony Bravia XBR6 -
The parasound and wired 4 sound are a definate no go in my book. Looks like I'll be going with the NAD t-975, or maybe the M25 unless I see something else of intrestet.
I had wondered about using the LSi9's in the rear. Not sure why the previous owner assembled the combination. I really have no other place to use them in, so i'll put them up for sale and get another set of LSiFX's. -
+tonyb.
Hope you take this the right way. The picture in my mind, while reading that detailed post, was you sitting on a well padded chair w/ sniffer of brandy in one hand speaking in a voice about a notch and a half maybe 2 above a whisper.
Further, that info would make a great sticky. I will copy & paste that into a note file on my phone. Then these type discussions come up, I'll copy & "post" saying from tonyb. Good stuff.
To the OP: many receivers shouldn't have trouble driving just side or rear channels if something "beefy" powers the big stuff (LCR)
Shalom, the "other" TonySamsung 60" UN60ES6100 LED Outlaw Audio 976 Pre/Pro Samsung BDP, Amazon Firestick, Phillips CD Changer Canare 14 ga - LCR tweeters inside*; Ctr Ch outside BJC 10 ga - LCR mids, inside* & out 8 ga Powerline: LR woofers, inside* & out *soldered LR: Tri-amped RTi A7 w/Rotels. Woofers - 980BX; Tweets & “Plugged*” Mids - 981, connected w/MP Premiere ICs Ctr Ch: Rotel RB981 -> Bi-amped CSi A6 Surrounds: Premiere ICs ->Rotel 981 -> AR 12 ga -> RTi A3. 5 Subs: Sunfire True SW Signature -> LFE & Ctr Ch; 4 Audio Pro Evidence @ the “Corners”. Power Conditioning & Distribution: 4 dedicated 20A feeds; APC H15; 5 Furman Miniport 20s *Xschop's handy work -
i use my AVR to power my rear speakers on my bedroom setup and have before on my old front room setupmole'
-