HAT Unity vs SR

Options
eloplayspolo
eloplayspolo Posts: 1,117
edited March 2012 in Car Audio & Electronics
Just like it says, for those of you that have heard both.....

What do you like better? the
Unity U51-2 5.25" 2-way Component Speaker System
or
POLK SR
2013 Toyota Prius
Audible Physics 3 Way: H6MB, AR3-A, AR2.0
Image Dynamics iDMax 12" D2v4
(2) Alpine PDX-V9 Bridged, Alpine PDX-M12 (500w Mid-Bass, 200w Mid, 200w Tweet, 1200w Sub)
Mosconi 6to8 v8
Post edited by eloplayspolo on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • eloplayspolo
    eloplayspolo Posts: 1,117
    edited March 2012
    Options
    or even the Zapco RB13.2 5.25"
    2013 Toyota Prius
    Audible Physics 3 Way: H6MB, AR3-A, AR2.0
    Image Dynamics iDMax 12" D2v4
    (2) Alpine PDX-V9 Bridged, Alpine PDX-M12 (500w Mid-Bass, 200w Mid, 200w Tweet, 1200w Sub)
    Mosconi 6to8 v8
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited March 2012
    Options
    The Unity are mid level HAT's. Not in the same league as the SR's. I've recently heard the legatia SE which is the top end in HAT. The ring radiator tweet was very similiar to the SR but the SR mid blows the legatia mid out of the water. The SR has better energy down low and a much more detailed midrange. The only MB I'd put ahead of the SR are the Scans and maybe the Dyn and DLS. All three cost a fair bit more than the SR's.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited March 2012
    Options
    Skip, you could make a killer bookshelf with the SR mid and tweet. Just a thought.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pentoncm
    pentoncm Posts: 379
    edited March 2012
    Options
    arun1963 wrote: »
    The Unity are mid level HAT's. Not in the same league as the SR's. I've recently heard the legatia SE which is the top end in HAT. The ring radiator tweet was very similiar to the SR but the SR mid blows the legatia mid out of the water. The SR has better energy down low and a much more detailed midrange. The only MB I'd put ahead of the SR are the Scans and maybe the Dyn and DLS. All three cost a fair bit more than the SR's.

    What HAT mids did you get a chance to listen to, the L4, L6, L8 or all of them ?
    Audison Bit Ten
    Kenwood X595
    Polk MM6501
    Polk MM1240
    Mtx 704x
    Alpine MRX50
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • arun1963
    arun1963 Posts: 1,797
    edited March 2012
    Options
    The L6 paired with the L1 pro R2 tweet. The MB had good punch down low but lacked details, the lower end notes sounded the same. The L6 was running all the way to 5khz, but when I played the mids alone, I felt the 500-5khz range lacked a bit of details. However when I engaged the tweet, this issue was less noticieable. The RR tweet is really nice, very smooth and open. But $600 for a pair of tweets is kinda steep considering that the best Scan tweets cost less. Overall a nice set but a bit overpriced and definately not better than the SR's. At least for me.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • eloplayspolo
    eloplayspolo Posts: 1,117
    edited March 2012
    Options
    I just went with the SRs from Dskip.
    What a salesman, that guy!
    2013 Toyota Prius
    Audible Physics 3 Way: H6MB, AR3-A, AR2.0
    Image Dynamics iDMax 12" D2v4
    (2) Alpine PDX-V9 Bridged, Alpine PDX-M12 (500w Mid-Bass, 200w Mid, 200w Tweet, 1200w Sub)
    Mosconi 6to8 v8
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter