Do I need a sound card?
exlvit
Posts: 19
Currently I'm using on-board sound card from my pc to connect to my HK3490 via digital coax. Since I'm using digital, I'm bypassing the on-board dac/realtek whatever, and using the dac on the HK3490 (right?).
If this is the case, do I even need to bother with a sound card?
If this is the case, do I even need to bother with a sound card?
PC -> HK3490 -> Polk Monitor 60II+JBL ES150P -> Ears
Post edited by exlvit on
Comments
-
How else do you plan to extract sound from your computer? If you get rid of the soundcard you will need a usb to digital coax converter. Now a good one might sound better then your soundcard, but you will need one or the other to get sound form your computer to that HK. Unless I am missing something??Living Room 2.2: Usher BE-718 "tiny dancers"; Dual DIY Dayton audio RSS210HF-4 Subs with Dayton SPA-250 amps; Arcam SA30; Musical Fidelity A308; Sony UBP-x1000es
Game Room 5.1.4: Denon AVR-X4200w; Sony UBP-x700; Definitive Technology Power Monitor 900 mains, CLR-3000 center, StudioMonitor 350 surrounds, ProMonitor 800 atmos x4; Sub - Monoprice Monolith 15in THX Ultra
Bedroom 2.1 Harmon Kardon HK3490; Bluesounds Node N130; Polk RT25i; ACI Titan Subwoofer -
Currently I'm using on-board sound card from my pc to connect to my HK3490 via digital coax. Since I'm using digital, I'm bypassing the on-board dac/realtek whatever, and using the dac on the HK3490 (right?).
If this is the case, do I even need to bother with a sound card?
Ummm,,,,,,you have a sound card, or else you wouldn't be able to output anything.
Maybe you meant to ask a more specific question. Or we need more details about what you want to do. The way it is now, is fine. What else are you wanting to do?
H9"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
Yeah, definitely could have worded my question better.
From my understanding, using digital out bypasses the sound card's dac, and lets my receiver process the digital signal with it's dac. Other than a potentially better dac than my receiver, are there any other benifets to upgrading my sound card?PC -> HK3490 -> Polk Monitor 60II+JBL ES150P -> Ears -
Yeah, definitely could have worded my question better.
From my understanding, using digital out bypasses the sound card's dac, and lets my receiver process the digital signal with it's dac. Other than a potentially better dac than my receiver, are there any other benifets to upgrading my sound card?
In my experience, using either an asynchronous USB > SPDIF converter or a wireless Squeezebox Touch are the best ways to get audio out of a computer. Using a digital output from your PC's sound card is not too far behind though. I'm not familiar with the quality of the digital output of your PC or with the quality of the DAC in your HK, but I'd imagine that a better external DAC would make more of a difference in overall sound than a better digital output method.
In any case, you should use a media player with a bit-perfect playback mode like ASIO or WASAPI.
You should also be playing accurately-ripped lossless files. (i.e., EAC > FLAC).
PC-based audio can be excellent when done right.2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's
Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's -
Yeah, definitely could have worded my question better.
From my understanding, using digital out bypasses the sound card's dac, and lets my receiver process the digital signal with it's dac. Other than a potentially better dac than my receiver, are there any other benifets to upgrading my sound card?
It doesn't bypass the soundcard, it bypasses the digital to analog portion of the soundcard. It's still using a soundcard to generate the digital output. USB doesn't use a soundcard at all. The way you are doing it by toslink adds an extra conversion to the process and it also goes thru all the Windows mixer protocols as well as the onboard soundcard. Not the best way to do it.
H9"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
falconcry72 wrote: »In my experience, using either an asynchronous USB > SPDIF converter or a wireless Squeezebox Touch are the best ways to get audio out of a computer. Using a digital output from your PC's sound card is not too far behind though. I'm not familiar with the quality of the digital output of your PC or with the quality of the DAC in your HK, but I'd imagine that a better external DAC would make more of a difference in overall sound than a better digital output method.
In any case, you should use a media player with a bit-perfect playback mode like ASIO or WASAPI.
You should also be playing accurately-ripped lossless files. (i.e., EAC > FLAC).
PC-based audio can be excellent when done right.
While 100% correct, I believe your answer is way over the OP's head and not really what he asked. Best to start back at square one rather than jump right to all the technical stuff.
H9"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
While 100% correct, I believe your answer is way over the OP's head and not really what he asked. Best to start back at square one rather than jump right to all the technical stuff.
H9
yea yea yea... I just figured exlvit needed some homework tonight.:biggrin:2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's
Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's -
Yeah, definitely could have worded my question better.
From my understanding, using digital out bypasses the sound card's dac, and lets my receiver process the digital signal with it's dac. Other than a potentially better dac than my receiver, are there any other benifets to upgrading my sound card?
What operating system are you running? (I could assume Windows 7) It makes a difference how the digital signal is processed. If you are using an optical out then there are several semi-complicated settings you need to be aware of, but those all depend on what operating system you are using.
To answer your question, no, just getting a better sound card won't do much until you achieve a bit perfect stream out of the computer to the HK's dac's.
A simpler way is as falcon suggested a USB --> SPDIF converter, but those have inherent issues as well, as the extra conversion isn't optimal even if it is asynchronous. But, depending on the converter used, it still is probably better than the optical output of an internal soundcard.
H9"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
Looks like I do have some homework to do tonight.
Right now stereo rca cables and spdif cables are what I have, so I think I chose the best route based on my current gear.
Any suggestions on a USB to SPDIF converter? :cheesygrin:PC -> HK3490 -> Polk Monitor 60II+JBL ES150P -> Ears -
What are the stereo rca cables used for? They come out of your soundcard?"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!
-
They're in the cable box! The only cable running between the pc and receiver is the spdif.
And yes, I'm running windows 7. Not sure about the settings you were talking about, though.PC -> HK3490 -> Polk Monitor 60II+JBL ES150P -> Ears -
...A simpler way is as falcon suggested a USB --> SPDIF converter, but those have inherent issues as well, as the extra conversion isn't optimal even if it is asynchronous. But, depending on the converter used, it still is probably better than the optical output of an internal soundcard.
H9
FYI, I found the $100 Musical Fidelity V-Link to sound better than a $200 Asus Sonar Essence ST internal sound card, which has about the best SPDIF out as you're gonna ever get with an internal sound card. The Audio Gd Digital Interface is better still, and I'd say it comes in at a dead tie with the SQBT.2-Channel: PC > Schiit Eitr > Audio Research DAC-8 > Audio Research LS-26 > Pass Labs X-250.5 > Magnepan 3.7's
Living Room: PC > Marantz AV-7703 > Emotiva XPA-5 > Sonus Faber Liuto Towers, Sonus Faber Liuto Center, Sonus Faber Liuto Bookshelves > Dual SVS PC12-Pluses
Office: Phone/Tablet > AudioEngine B1 > McIntosh D100 > Bryston 4B-ST > Polk Audio LSiM-703's -
Ummm,,,,,,you have a sound card, or else you wouldn't be able to output anything.
If he is using the onboard sound processor he is not using a sound card.
RT-12, CS350-LS, PSW-300, Infinity Overture 1, Monoprice RC-65i
Adcom GFA-545II, GFA-6000, Outlaw Audio 990, Netgear NeoTV
Denon DCM-460, DMD-1000, Sony BDP-360, Bravia KDL-40Z4100/S
Monster AVL-300, HTS-2500 MKII -
If he is using the onboard sound processor he is not using a sound card.
My reply was based on what he posted.
"Currently I'm using on-board sound card from my pc"
H9"Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul! -
If he is using the onboard sound processor he is not using a sound card.
-
Using any kind of streaming platform (Playstation3/Squeezebox and such) is a great way to achieve great playback without any issue inherant to the use of a poor transport mechanism (like in cheapos CD players/or even the PS3 CD playing) and to computer noise/synchronous USB jitters.
As you can see, a computer case is a noisy environment and there is some risks that analog sound quality could be affected, and some people even pointed out that the onboard optical output isn't perfect either, even if it's 0 and 1. You must do a lot of things to actually achieve a bit-perfect stream, and it goes the same if you use an external DAC with USB output (i.e. installing either WASAPI or ASIO drivers and using a good media player, not something like itunes).
By replacing your onboard sound "chip" with a new card, it would be of way better quality, but still an external DAC might be better (or not) than this sound card... it depends on a few factors like the price of the DAC itself and your ports quality on your motherboard (installing a good quality soundcard on a crappy motherboard doesn't make sense).
Another option, as falcon said, would be to buy a Squeezebox or to use a PS3 in the process if you have one (using a program called PS3 Media Server). When properly set, it can be both conveniant and sound better than using the optical output from your computer as it either uses wi-fi or wired connection from your router to "grab" the music from your PC. That way, you won't have any of the jitters/noise caused by the PC itself, have a conveniant way to pick-up your music and an integrated external DAC. However, there is no way to tell if the Squeezebox DAC is better or not than your receiver one... For your information, my Musical Fidelity V-DAC (250$) is only a small step up from my 2 years old entry-level Yamaha receiver's DAC (i.e. this is a welcomed difference, but nothing like "nigth and day"), and if I didn't swap my receiver in the process for an integrated amp (which doesn't have a DAC), I would have considered this money somewhat wasted...
Either way, you need to have at least FLAC files, which are lossless "compressed" music files, similar to .zip files.Speakers: Polk Audio LSiM 705, LSiM 703, LSiM 704c
Receiver: Denon X3500H