Immortals

fatchowmein
fatchowmein Posts: 2,637
edited November 2011 in Music & Movies
Decent flick. Not as good as 300. Not enough fights. Acting was ok. Zeus was interesting. Worth a rental but not the $20 for two 3D tickets that I shelled out for.
Post edited by fatchowmein on

Comments

  • Face
    Face Posts: 14,340
    edited November 2011
    I enjoyed it more than 300, YMMV. I found the fighting sufficient, the movie itself also had a good pace and the story was good for that "type" of movie. Looking forward to it on Blu, the cinematography and soundtrack were fantastic, plenty of demo material there(esp the tsunami scene).
    "He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss the abyss also gazes into you." Friedrich Nietzsche
  • LeftCoast
    LeftCoast Posts: 406
    edited November 2011
    I liked 300 enough to buy the blu ray disc. I didn't like Clash of the Titans and found it to be a waste of movie ticket money. It Immortals better than Clash of the Titans in your guys' opinion? (Haven't seen it yet)
  • chumlie
    chumlie Posts: 8,658
    edited November 2011
    Anything better than Clash of the Titans.
  • fatchowmein
    fatchowmein Posts: 2,637
    edited November 2011
    LeftCoast wrote: »
    I liked 300 enough to buy the blu ray disc. I didn't like Clash of the Titans and found it to be a waste of movie ticket money. It Immortals better than Clash of the Titans in your guys' opinion? (Haven't seen it yet)

    Well... The original Clash was cheesy but I was a kid when it came out and it was cool! Of course, I may no longer feel the same way decades later. The remake, however, was meh. Immortals is better than the remake.